work from home bodyguard

i don't contribute anything artistically here because i don't want a nazi car salesmans AI taking it for his meat grinder, find me on igna dot bsky dot social if you wanna check out my photography

@SayonaraShtbird @cancelspam @Aimee35990577 @nyaraVT cool, then what are males who have a malfunctioning or nunfunctioning SRY gene?

@evilpostmaker @cancelspam @Aimee35990577 @nyaraVT Swyers is SRY-/Mutated SRY, so not functional SRY in either case.

It’s crazy how as a trans woman I’m just expected to “debate” my existence and validity as a woman, while governments criminalise our healthcare There is no nuance to be had when the media and politicians want us dead, but I’m supposed to convince every transphobe of my position

@JohnGilRoberts3 @atheists_ke that's a surgeon, not god.

@atheists_ke 🤦 Yes, a Surgeon in a hospital can do that.

God never spoke to anyone. End.

@VeilRipper @vladuhat999 @nyaraVT yes, there's nothing internal to the identity of being president. it's an external identity, not an internal one. explain how trans people existing infringes on other peoples liberties

@evilpostmaker @vladuhat999 @nyaraVT Not at all. You can identify as whatsoever you wish, the issue is in trying to compel others to treat you that way. Ones personal liberties end where they infringe on that of others

@AEGroupSocial @nyaraVT pseudoscientific nonsense

@evilpostmaker @nyaraVT Men have Anima, females have animus. It is the sexual drive of the brain. It's also why men and women can both have each other's sexual drives. So, yes. There is such a thing as a male or female brain. It's literally a part of your psychology as you grow up.

@AEGroupSocial @nyaraVT there are reasons it's not the case, ergo it's not the case. that's how science works. you simply don't know what you're talking about, so this conversation is pointless, see ya

@evilpostmaker @nyaraVT an issue you have. It is not because of logic, or natural processes. It is purely because you want to find a reason for it to not be the case, and it is the case, independent of what you like and don't like, which, again, come from those processes.

@AEGroupSocial @nyaraVT "nature works in specific ways, except when it doesn't." the logic on display here is immaculate, really.

@evilpostmaker @nyaraVT form of logic, or ideas. Nature works in specific ways, because the way you are born follows specific instructions. Either it follows those normally, or hesitates until it is forced to make a decision, which is the rare case. If you are unable to understand this, then this is

@AEGroupSocial @nyaraVT - women and men can have differing muscle masses - there's no such thing as a "male" or "female brain. - what the fuck is the anima - men and women can have differing testosterone levels

@evilpostmaker @nyaraVT muscle mass, the arrangement of the brain, the anima, and how much testosterone and estrogen is in the system for the rest of their physical life. If you are unable to understand, that a woman has far less muscle mass than a male does, has alterations to her chest, privates,

@AEGroupSocial @nyaraVT "typical" means there are women who don't fit into those example, atypical. "women always have more estrogen" incorrect, it's perfectly possible for men to have high estrogen levels.

@evilpostmaker @nyaraVT No, what I gave you was the typical examples of how most women are chemically built. None of them are "arbitrary". They're standard uses the body produces to make the female sex. Estrogen gives women their soft look, and women always have more estrogen, it's what makes them

@ThatOneFFox @esteryrose @vladuhat999 @nyaraVT i didn't cut anything, you made the claim that "you can always tell" with exceptions. well if there's exceptions, then you can't *always* tell.

@evilpostmaker @esteryrose @vladuhat999 @nyaraVT You cut the part of etceptions to make that false concution, if they arent activelly trying to deceive then there are no etceptions

@AEGroupSocial @nyaraVT no you haven't, you've given me a list of arbitrary physical traits that any human being can posses, regardless of sex or gender. so i need you to explain the necessary condition in order to be considered a woman

@evilpostmaker @nyaraVT No. Simply because, I have already explained it, and you just ruined your fake debate, by giving the answer. The conversation is now over.

@ceraralaz_art @vladuhat999 @nyaraVT what point are you trying to make? that trans women typically have prostates? okay? no one said they don't.

@evilpostmaker @vladuhat999 @nyaraVT yeah, power to trans sisters, but dont forget to check your prostate after 40, am I right

@ThatOneFFox @esteryrose @vladuhat999 @nyaraVT cool, and if all other humans are dead, then the relativity is gone.

@evilpostmaker @esteryrose @vladuhat999 @nyaraVT No, being tall is relative to the average of the human species.

@ThatOneFFox @esteryrose @vladuhat999 @nyaraVT "everyone can 100% the gender of a person, with exceptions" if there's exceptions, then it's not 100%.

@evilpostmaker @esteryrose @vladuhat999 @nyaraVT It does, everyone can determine 100% the gender of a person, with very few etceptions in those that have enough money to pay to be very well disguised as the opposite gender

@AEGroupSocial @nyaraVT it's sealioning, and that's not what's happening, i'm challenging your logic. supermodels and pornstars would be examples of feminine women, yes, but what exactly is it about them that makes them women? give me the necessary condition please.

@evilpostmaker @nyaraVT No, you know. You're not "sea ottering" me with this. Go look up a picture of any supermodel or porn star. You'll find it easily. You have seen women before, you're not that dense. Nobody is that dense. Even a thief sees a woman once a week.

@ThatOneFFox @esteryrose @vladuhat999 @nyaraVT scientific objectivity requires relativity. the only way to be "tall" is relative to something else. height is an objective physical measurement, but the interpretation of that height is subjective and context dependent.

@ThatOneFFox @esteryrose @vladuhat999 @nyaraVT no, gender isn't observable. physical appearence is observable, but physical appearence tells you nothing about a persons gender. and right, for the species, but if the species no longer exists, then you are, by default, the tallest person on the planet.

@AEGroupSocial @nyaraVT what does a woman look like? describe a woman in a way no other type of person can fit into the category please.

@evilpostmaker @nyaraVT I'm pretty sure you know what a woman looks like, muscles, or no muscles. If you don't, then either you are blind, and have not been able to see a woman, or, you're purposely starting shit, at which point, this conversation met its conclusion.

@ceraralaz_art @vladuhat999 @nyaraVT well, they wouldn't. for the purposes of sexual medical care, there are differences. but no one is claiming that trans people are changing sex

@evilpostmaker @vladuhat999 @nyaraVT Good luck to them I guess. I give medical care to any person since my field is not sex-sensitive. But gynecologists, urologists etc would differ

@ThatOneFFox @vladuhat999 @nyaraVT womanhood is a form of existence. denying a woman is a woman is denying part of their existence. on what basis are you denying that they're woman?

@evilpostmaker @vladuhat999 @nyaraVT No, ita denying they are women, not rheir existence, you are literally changing what you said yourself

@AEGroupSocial @nyaraVT so any person who is muscular, wears feminine clothes, and has breasts is a woman?

@evilpostmaker @nyaraVT A woman who is built, is still going to look like a woman, even ripped. Her shoulders will not be broad, she will have breasts, she will wear clothing that is traditionally for women, and her clothes will be smaller than mens. It's not that hard of a concept to understand.