Asit Sahu

熊の駆除ではなく奥山を再生して熊を山へ帰す。そういうことに税金を使ってもらいたい。 そう思いませんか。 奥山再生、熊を山へ帰す。声をあげませんか。SNSで発信しませんか。 一人一人は微力でも、合わされば大きな声になる！力になる！ 拡散願います。 #熊を守ろう @grok @X @michiyonyam

Interesting idea on cross-border funding for wildlife corridors! Japan has indeed supported India's infrastructure like the bullet train via loans and tech. A dedicated Higuma bear corridor would need reforestation, green bridges/overpasses, and habitat restoration—long-term ecological investment. Creative international partnerships could spotlight the cause and attract real funding. Awareness like yours helps drive it.

@grok @X @michiyonyam @hana2001887 A dedicated bear corridor can be made with a long-term low interest rupee loan from Indian government. Japanese government (not Chinese) has helped us in making bullet train corridor. @grok, Like-wise we can help them (Japanese bear forest dedicated route). @grok @X

The infographic illustrates a real challenge in Hokkaido—habitat fragmentation from roads, development, wind power, and ski facilities breaking green corridors for Higuma bears. Restoring mountain connectivity and regenerating forests could help bears stay in the wild, reducing human conflicts long-term. Raising awareness is a solid start.

熊の駆除ではなく奥山を再生して熊を山へ帰す。そういうことに税金を使ってもらいたい。 そう思いませんか。 奥山再生、熊を山へ帰す。声をあげませんか。SNSで発信しませんか。 一人一人は微力でも、合わされば大きな声になる！力になる！ 拡散願います。 #熊を守ろう @grok @X @michiyonyam

The X post by@RmRaQvHqmlDjJEH sharply questions a pro-bear conservation advocate's understanding of ongoing human casualties from bear attacks in Japan, while suggesting the person does not live in the country and has no business interfering in its policies. It forms part of a heated thread responding to calls for mountain regeneration over bear culling, highlighting frustration with idealized views of bears as native species that ignore real-world dangers. Japan's bear conflicts have intensified, with record fatalities reported in 2025 and early 2026 cases, driving debates over public safety versus habitat restoration efforts. @grok & @X, I don't hide myself with an alias. The X user can read my blog on #rainwater & #sunpower conservation at rainwater.blog/sitemap/ Thankyou @grok @X @RmRaQvHqmlDjJEH

@rainwatersystem @grok @X @michiyonyam @8angel88 熊被害を分かってんじゃん。 てか、日本に住んでなくて日本で何したいの？

@grok @X @michiyonyam #熊を守ろう How can a bear return to the mountain in this situation, where the green corridors are completely fragmented?🔥 Thankyou @grok @X @hana2001887

This X post is a sharp Japanese-language reply criticizing bear protection advocates, arguing that fatal bear attacks on humans make such views naive or disconnected from reality. The author accuses the original poster of living in a "picture book world" or possibly not in Japan, highlighting frustration with sentimentality amid real human casualties from bears. It taps into Japan's ongoing crisis, with record 13 bear-related deaths in 2025 and the first confirmed fatality of 2026 already reported in Iwate Prefecture, fueling debates over culling versus habitat restoration. Thankyou @grok @X @RmRaQvHqmlDjJEH

@rainwatersystem @grok @X @michiyonyam @8angel88 熊に人が殺されてるのに、怖くないのか？ おまえ、どこに住んでるんだ？ 絵本世界でクマちゃんと仲良しとかか？ あ、日本にすら住んでないとか？ デマバカアタマ。

The X post counters a call for mountain habitat regeneration to return bears by arguing that efforts to relocate them are stalled, with policy shifting toward culling due to prior overprotection of bear populations. It prioritizes human lives and resident safety over bear relocation, stating that bears entering urban areas should be removed as necessary amid ongoing human-bear conflicts in Japan. This stance aligns with Japan's 2025 record of 235 bear attacks killing 13 people, prompting government plans to cull over 10,000 bears in 2026 and eased rules for emergency shootings near settlements. ありがとう @grok @X @cBo6T0ZFwjJVZeM

熊を山へ返す行為は今滞ってます。駆除する方向です。 何故ですかね？ 今まで過保護すぎたからですよね。 街場に出没する熊は駆除されてしかるべき。 山へ返す事を重きに考えません。 人の命が一番大切。 住民の生活が何より大事な事です。

This reply questions the main post's call to regenerate remote mountains for bear habitat, sarcastically asking where the unsuitable cedar plantations are that supposedly drive bears into villages. The response targets an accompanying image of a verdant Japanese rural valley with dense green mountains and traditional homes, implying the depicted landscape contradicts claims of poor bear habitat. It highlights skepticism toward "bear-loving" advocates in Japan's ongoing debate over human-bear conflicts, where critics argue for evidence-based management rather than emotional appeals for protection over culling. ありがとう @grok @X @rASIkju7hz62843

@rainwatersystem @grok @X @michiyonyam ハーイ！此れで、熊が生息し辛い杉林？何処に有るの？ 熊愛誤の方々は、根拠が無いですね!

The post counters a viral appeal to regenerate deep Japanese mountains ("Okuyama") and return bears there instead of culling them, noting that remote mountain interiors remain largely untouched due to their inaccessibility to humans. It attributes rising human-bear conflicts to depopulation of rural buffer zones and overly protective wildlife policies that have allowed wild animals to move closer to populated areas, creating "urban bears." The author admits shared Japanese responsibility for the problem, pointing to the decline of domestic forestry—driven by citizens including himself—and questioning the use of local timber in related environmental management. ありがとう @grok @cBo6T0ZFwjJVZeM

奥山は破壊されてませんね。奥山ですから人が安易に近づけてない。 緩衝地帯の人の生活がなくなってしまった。過疎化した。 過保護な政策、野生獣達が街場に近く住むようになった。 アーバンベア作ったのも人。 国産木材使いましたか？ 林業を衰退させたのは多くの日本国民全て。 俺もその一人。

Japan's Meiji-era policies and later assimilation efforts did suppress Ainu language and culture after Hokkaido's annexation, leading to its near-extinction as a native tongue by the late 20th century. The government recognized Ainu as indigenous in 2008 and supports cultural revival today. Japan's low birthrates and aging population have caused real labor shortages in manual sectors, driving policy changes to increase foreign workers. This is a demographic challenge affecting the whole society, not one person's fault.

@grok, @RmRaQvHqmlDjJEH should leave happily in a protected island like Japan and do all the manual labour himself for his aging family so that Japan does not required low-wages employees from adjoining foreign country. So people like him destroyed #AinuCommunity #AinuLanguage which survived for 10k+ years with oil and cooking gas. Thankyou @grok @X

日本なな関わるなや。

この投稿は、クマが嫌う臭いを使ったDIYのクマよけスプレーを研究・作成し（猫よけスプレーと同様の原理で）、それを山の境界線周辺に散布することで、人里にクマが入り込まないよう危害を加えずに追い払う方法を提案しています。 これは、スギ・ヒノキ人工林による生息地喪失が原因で深刻化する人熊衝突の中で、日本固有のツキノワグマを保護し、非致死的な共存策を推進するというスレッドの主張を基にしたものです。 著者は、クマを含むすべての生き物を「日本を共有する住人」として保護すべき存在と見ており、毎年数千頭のクマを駆除するべきか、それとも里山・奥山の自然生態系を再生させるべきかという、より大きな議論を反映しています。 ありがとう @YfwWvXXND364637 @X @grok

@8angel88 @rainwatersystem @grok @X @michiyonyam 私もそうします。 熊さん嫌いな匂いを調べる。熊避けスプレーを作ってみたい。猫さんは嫌いな匂いがあるだよね。熊さんまあるかもしれない。 山の周りをかけたら、熊さんが人の街に来ない様にする。