🌌 ͜ʖ🌌

17.8K posts

🌌 ͜ʖ🌌 banner
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌

🌌 ͜ʖ🌌

@seldon_seen

𝖒𝖆𝖓𝖉𝖆𝖙𝖚𝖒 𝖆𝖉 𝖆𝖘𝖙𝖗𝖆

𓁿 Присоединился Mayıs 2021
2.5K Подписки1.2K Подписчики
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌@seldon_seen·
many such cases x.com/domdosu/status…
Dom Dosu 🇺🇸@domdosu

Thomas Jefferson was so deeply in debt after years of using leverage against his land to fund a lavish lifestyle that he resorted to auctioning off Monticello by selling ~11,000 tickets for $10 each (~$2-3MM today), turning his entire estate into a lottery He died before things played out and Monticello was sold to pay creditors Those identifying with the permanent underclass saw this as a shot at escaping. The idea of "hypergambling into elite status" dates back to the inception of the United States and continues to show up in markets and culture, manifesting itself into what we see as the hyperfinancialization of quite literally everything It’s one of the primary reasons I remain optimistic on crypto and speculation in general (beyond adoption of crypto rails) It’s the most efficient large scale lottery/casino we’ve seen in decades, and I don’t see that changing anytime soon

English
0
0
1
27
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌@seldon_seen·
cash lottery to a social leaderboard defaults to purposeless offramp. tickets can accrue by evolving social criteria, redraws can be secondarily priced, and some productive assets can be stewarded from a distance.
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌@seldon_seen

a permissionless goods lottery needs escrow, where the winning ticket can call a redraw after grace period. the reputation can be derived, rather than incentivizing frivolous complaints. lots of options, like transferrability or delegation to chain of custody.

English
1
0
1
97
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌@seldon_seen·
@deepfates super as in "supergroup"? most of modernity is superintelligent if this is super as in supernatural, that's in the eye of the beholder.
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌 tweet media
English
0
0
1
59
🎭
🎭@deepfates·
is there any system on Earth currently that is "superintelligent"?
English
24
0
28
3.7K
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌 ретвитнул
sacha
sacha@sacha·
when you normalize giving discretionary emergency powers to a committee, you effectively import the worst parts of the existing "democratic" system in other words you import democracy with discretion over specific groups/actors. this combination is effectively what the administrative-state critique, from hayek through the public-choice literature through the post-2008 financial-regulation debates, has targeted you can try to justify via the ends all you want but procedurally it runs counter to the raison d'etre of crypto if you're going to have rules to deal with these things that are credibly neutral then they cannot be discretionary, which means they need to be formally articulated in advance and be generally applicable
English
3
6
25
2.2K
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌@seldon_seen·
@ZyMazza and execution can be expressed as polynomial
English
0
0
0
13
Zy
Zy@ZyMazza·
I feel like it kind of gets glossed over that semantic information can be expressed as vectors. That’s surprising, right?
English
111
18
983
60.2K
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌@seldon_seen·
@gfodor no, the labor market won't collapse except for some premium, and that income will need to be supplemented by a competition of dividends. there's always more solar power and signal to process at a distance.
English
0
0
0
6
gfodor.id
gfodor.id@gfodor·
It would be much easier if you're going to take a position against UBI you say if you agree or disagree with the premise that AI is going to collapse the market price of human labor, and propose an alternative solution. 99% of commentators are failing this simple test.
English
88
13
185
7.5K
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌 ретвитнул
𒐪
𒐪@SHL0MS·
Aaron Swartz on doomers
𒐪 tweet media
English
10
17
133
15.5K
Neeraj K. Agrawal
Neeraj K. Agrawal@NeerajKA·
Let’s say someone likes your ape enough that they want to wear it on a shirt. They would pay you royalties for that.
English
89
233
6.5K
374.8K
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌@seldon_seen·
@aphysicist livestream of valuable tinkering or it isn't happening.
English
0
0
0
58
Aaron Slodov
Aaron Slodov@aphysicist·
ok i solved UHI/UBI, pack it up. since agency matters more than intelligence, govt gives every person compute and a robot and can build from there. the market is now billions of personal economies. gamers rise up.
English
29
7
85
5.4K
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌@seldon_seen·
airdrops don't need to be extractive, the project can release a permit/NFT/GPU periodically, and the proceeds from the market discovery remains accountable to public results (without revealing everything else). warrant problem isn't as severe if tickets are soulbound.
English
0
0
0
31
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌@seldon_seen·
a permissionless goods lottery needs escrow, where the winning ticket can call a redraw after grace period. the reputation can be derived, rather than incentivizing frivolous complaints. lots of options, like transferrability or delegation to chain of custody.
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌 tweet media
English
1
0
1
146
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌@seldon_seen·
the yield is never priced in every form of capital involved.
English
0
0
0
19
gfodor.id
gfodor.id@gfodor·
Imagine the prices of all goods and services were slashed by 1000x, but if you tried to find a job, raise money for a startup, or sell anything yourself you’d find no counterparty whatsoever. Now imagine that’s true for most people. What’s the logical solution to this?
English
130
5
369
32.6K
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌 ретвитнул
Hugo
Hugo@striedinger·
The same ai labs telling you ui will no longer be a thing are selling you the same exact product with a different ui every other week
Claude@claudeai

Introducing Claude Design by Anthropic Labs: make prototypes, slides, and one-pagers by talking to Claude. Powered by Claude Opus 4.7, our most capable vision model. Available in research preview on the Pro, Max, Team, and Enterprise plans, rolling out throughout the day.

English
44
105
1.6K
64K
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌
🌌 ͜ʖ🌌@seldon_seen·
the irony of AI policy is that the ideal can be really boring what you mean, we need to drop the cost of land freight to zero?
English
0
0
0
12

Открыть

@deepfates @ZyMazza @gfodor @NeerajKA @aphysicist @elonmusk @BarackObama @taylorswift13