paul

@JohnCleese Cry harder bitches.

Maybe if the Muslims stopped threatening to kill infidels, that would help ?

youtube.com/watch?v=IaH7Te… Grrr.

@AvonandsomerRob " Brown Finger "

Keir Starmer plays 007 in the next James Bond Movie. Can we get a working title?

@SternDrewCrypto Just fucking stop it. Form militia that will engage with any and all enforcement of this act of natural eco-side.

🚨🐝 BEE APOCALYPSE: NEW ZEALAND GOVERNMENT ORDERS MASS BURNING OF PERFECTLY HEALTHY HIVES IN SHOCKING ATTACK ON FOOD SUPPLY! 🚨 Beekeepers in New Zealand are being brutally forced by authorities to burn their healthy, strong bee hives alive. “We’ve been told to burn healthy strong bee hives.” “Look at how healthy these bees are, no disease or anything.” Bees are quite possibly the most important insect to exist. It is not a coincidence they are now dying out rapidly with governments also persecuting beekeepers. All part of the same evil agenda. This is no random policy. While bees pollinate one third of the world's food, entire thriving colonies are being torched under the excuse of "biosecurity." No mercy, no real compensation, just flames destroying years of work and millions in value. They claim it's to stop disease, yet keepers show frame after frame of vigorous, disease free bees being sentenced to death. Why now? Why target the very creatures that keep our food chain alive? Because a world with abundant natural food cannot be fully controlled. Starve the bees, starve the people. Force everyone onto corporate GMO crops, lab made slop, and whatever scraps the elite decide to hand out. This is deliberate. This is war on nature and war on humanity. Collapsing bee populations worldwide plus government crackdowns on beekeepers equals one thing: engineered famine and total dependency. The agenda is unfolding in plain sight. Support local beekeepers now. Question every order that destroys what sustains life. Share this far and wide before they silence it. The bees are dying and so is our freedom. WAKE UP! 🐝🔥

@Femi_sorry @immenselysleek @ZiaYusufUK Great Film. Shit Metaphor.

@immenselysleek @ZiaYusufUK Happy to! Zia Yusuf is a British Muslim. And he is simping for Nigel Farage, who says half of British Muslims support terrorism. Sycophantically praising someone whose agenda is a danger to everyone who looks like you, is what the house slave Steven did in Django Unchained.

Nobody else in British politics can pull off this level of aura 🇬🇧

A true story.

@JChimirie66677 @Keir_Starmer And when we've bleached them out of existence, permanently, I reckon every pub in the country should rename itself for one week only, with live music and tapas, " The Salted Slug ".

@Keir_Starmer Patriots don't open the nation's borders under the pious mask of "compassion." Patriots don't bleed working families with higher taxes while lavishing billions on NGOs, foreign regimes, and mass migration. Patriots don't sneer at Britain's history while bending the knee to supranational courts, foreign lobbies, and grievance-mongers demanding their pound of flesh. When Attlee built the welfare state, he did it to lift working Britons out of poverty after the war - not to open the system to the world. When Thatcher faced decline, she smashed through the defeatism of her age and forced the country to stand on its own two feet again. Both understood the essence of patriotism: that Britain must first and foremost serve her own people. This government does the opposite. If it was truly a government of patriots, the boats would have stopped, criminals would be deported, and our streets would be safe again. Instead, we have record migration, gangs ruling estates, violence on our streets, and police chasing tweets while families bury their dead. If it was truly a government fighting for working people, energy would be cheap, food would be affordable, and wages would rise. Instead, you flood the labour market, pile on regulations, and let inflation grind down every pay packet. You make announcements of "record funding" while queues grow longer and services collapse. Working people can't live on slogans. They can't pay bills with press releases. And if this was truly a government of patriots, law would be made in Westminster, not Strasbourg. Order would be upheld on our streets, not outsourced to NGOs. Borders would be enforced, not mocked. That is patriotism: security, sovereignty, stability. What you offer is none of that. You wrap failure in the flag and call it care. You feed the nation managed decline and tell us it's renewal. You dress treachery in the language of loyalty. Call it what you like. It isn't patriotism. It's surrender. It's betrayal. And working people see through it. They know what patriotism looks like, and it isn't you. "Instead, we have record migration, gangs ruling estates, violence on our streets, and police chasing tweets while families bury their dead."

This is a government of patriots fighting for working people.

@5Pillarsuk I'm struggling to identify the make and model of that car? 🤔

Three additional people have been arrested in connection with a suspected arson attack on a mosque in Peacehaven, as counter-terrorism officers continue to lead the investigation. 5pillarsuk.com/2026/03/26/thr…

@SimonElmer2022 Separated at birth.

If you’re wondering why British schoolchildren are being forced to pray to Allah, wear the hijab and prevented from participating in classes on art, music and dance because they are haram under Sharia law, in March 2025 the UK’s interim Chair of Ofsted (the Office for Standards in Education, Children’s Services and Skills) was handed to Hamid Patel (photograph below). Patel is not only a Muslim and second-generation immigrant whose parents are from Gujarat in India, he is also a mufti — which is to say, an Islamic jurist qualified to adjudicate on Sharia law. As such, he is authorised to issue fatwas, such as that issued against the writer, Salman Rushdie, who has lived under the threat of assassination for over three decades and in August 2022 was stabbed 15 times by a 24-year-old Lebanese Muslim man who was born in the USA. This demonstrates the importance of an Islamic education in turning Muslims born in non-Muslim countries into jihadists and terrorists against the people of the host nation. In Britain, the median age of Muslims is 27, and in the 2021 Census 1 in 12 schoolchildren in Britain were Muslim. A more recent census of 21,500 primary and secondary schools in England made in January 2025 reported that White British children were a minority in a quarter of them. In 454 schools, White British children made up less than 2% of the students. This is further evidence of the ghettoisation of Muslims living in Britain, and not of their integration into British society. In 72 UK schools there wasn’t a single White British child. At Rockwood Academy in Birmingham, where 29.9% of the population were Muslim in the 2021 Census and far more are today, not one of the 1,084 students were recorded as White British; while in Loxford School in the London Borough of Redbridge, where 31.3% of the population were Muslim in 2021 and far more are today, just 12 of the 2,779 pupils were White British. In London, which has been under its Pakistani Muslim Mayor, Sadiq Khan, for ten years, White British children are a minority in all 32 boroughs apart from Bromley, where they make up 50.3%. In the London Borough of Newham, under its Pakistani Muslim Mayor, Rokhsana Fiaz, and where 32% of the population were Muslim in the 2021 Census and far more are today, just 5% of children were recorded in the school census as White British. In the London Borough of Harrow, where 16% of the population were Muslim in 2021 and far more are today, just 7% of school children were White British. Other local authority areas in England where White British children are a minority include Manchester, Nottingham, Coventry, Luton, Milton Keynes, Peterborough, Oldham and Blackburn and Darwen. Like the UK Home Secretary and Pakistani Muslim, Shabana Mahmood, 79% of Muslims age 13 to 14 say their religion is ‘very important’ to the way they live their life. Of even greater concern to Britons, while Muslims form 6.5% of the overall population of Britain (6.7% in England), 10% of children aged 5 to 15 years old are Muslim. In Birmingham, where Mahmood was born, 6 out of 69 electoral wards have over 85% Muslim schoolchildren. The Muslim Council of Britain — itself a front for the Muslim Brotherhood in the UK — has estimated that, by 2031, there will be approximately 552,000 Muslim teenagers in Britain. Under the mufti Chair of Ofsted and his Islamist successors on the woke-Left, they will increasingly be taught to obey the dictates of Sharia Law on every aspect of their lives. As an example of which, on 11 March, 2025, Bedfont Primary School in the London Borough of Hounslow sent a letter with an Ofsted letterhead to the parent of an English schoolchild informing them that, since their son had refused to take part in the school’s assembly on Ramadan, this had been recorded on the child’s behaviour record as a ‘racist incident’, and warned them that any repetition would lead to sanctions against the child. More recently, Labour-run councils across the North of England have instructed UK schools that figurative art, music and dance lessons conflict with the dogma of Islam and should therefore be discouraged. And this week, a supposedly Church of England school in Lincolnshire forced the children in their care to kneel facing Mecca and pray to Allah during religious education classes. It is not Muslims who are being secularised by living in Britain, but children born in Britain — both British and foreign — who are being Islamised by the application of Sharia law in Britain. In addition to being the Chair of Ofsted, Patel is also the Chief Executive of the Star Academies Trust, which runs around 36 schools, most of which are Islamic faith schools, in which the hijab is part of the school uniform for female students. Indeed, under the excuse of World Hijab Day, certain UK schools have already introduced, and worked to normalise, the wearing of Islamic clothing for women by their female pupils, which they characterise as an expression of ‘modesty’. Implicit in this normalisation of the treatment of women as the chattel of men under Islamic rule is that unveiled women and girls — which includes the entirety of the British female population — are ‘immodest’ and therefore — as the Muslim grooming and rape gangs have made abundantly clear — the religiously sanctioned objects of rape by Muslim men. And if you’re placated by the thousands of Muslims holding political and civil office in the UK claiming that religious interdictions on women aren’t required by Islam, in 2011 the Muslim Council of Britain made this declaration on the issue of veiling women’s faces in public: ‘We advise all Muslims to exercise extreme caution on this issue, since denying any part of Islam may lead to disbelief.’ If you don’t want to see Britain turned into an Islamic State, see your wives confined to the home and forced to wear the hijab and burqa in order to leave without being raped by immigrants, your daughters sold as sex slavery to Muslim men by Sharia courts, and your sons reduced to dhimmis forced to pay jizya (tax) to fund their demographic replacement in their own country — above all if you want to know what we, the British people, can do to restore Britain to the British, please click on the link below and consider purchasing a copy of my new book, The Great Replacement and the Islamisation of Britain. This is not an academic work telling us how to embrace Islam and accommodate the millions of immigrants brought here to conquer us, but a book of political action. architectsforsocialhousing.co.uk/2026/02/26/the…

youtu.be/gT6BD72Q7wo?si… Based.

@Lowkey0nline They are smelly, What's the problem? We all know it having queued behind or in front of them, they honk. Why is the truth a contentious issue?

Why is LBC presenter Tom Swarbrick endorsing a comment that Muslims are “smelly”?

youtu.be/JTh_wmjhZFM?si… Britain 2026.

youtube.com/watch?v=tb8CYb… Grrrr.

youtube.com/shorts/4DByDup… Based.

youtube.com/shorts/F7H05PG… Based.

youtu.be/cWu9mG7Hfi8?si… If Kate Bush and David Bowie did a duet.

youtube.com/shorts/O679SF1… Like him or loathe him, and I'm conflicted like everybody else, if this is true, what the fuck have other keyboard warriors ever done?

@RichardBentall @JChimirie66677 Anecdotal but they really don't in my experience.

@theagentcloud @JChimirie66677 The British public want to rejoin.

They Never Accepted Brexit. Now They're Reversing It In her interview with The Economist, Rachel Reeves said: "If we could go back in time I would have voted again to Remain. I wish we had voted to Remain." She is not a minister reluctantly implementing a democratic result she inherited. She is a minister who never accepted it and is now in a position to reverse it. Everything she has said this week flows from that position: the claim of economic damage, the insistence that Brexit is the exception rather than the norm, the promise of gains through closer alignment. This is not dispassionate analysis. It is a settled conviction finally given power. Starmer will use the King's Speech in May to introduce legislation bringing 76 EU directives back onto the UK statute book. The government calls this technical alignment. Lord Frost, who negotiated Britain's departure, calls it what it is: subordination. The bill will make EU laws applicable in Britain without Parliament having any meaningful say in shaping them. The scope is wide; food standards, pesticides, animal health, and the regulatory framework governing genetically modified organisms. That last area cuts straight through one of the few clear gains ministers themselves once claimed for Brexit: the freedom to set our own approach to gene editing. Bringing those rules back under EU alignment contradicts that position directly, and no one in government has explained why. Peter Kyle made the position plain. The government's red lines on the single market and customs union apply to "the moment we're in". Not permanent. Not binding. A holding position. Chris Bryant went further, calling the 2016 referendum a pack of lies and refusing to rule out a rejoin pledge. Sadiq Khan has already called for Labour to fight the next election on a commitment to full membership. Within Labour, the direction of travel is not debated. It is assumed. Downing Street rejected Khan's demand. But it's worth looking at what that rejection actually said. The Prime Minister's spokesman confirmed the red lines stand for now, while also stating that where alignment serves the national interest it will be pursued and that the prize is considerable. The denial and the programme sit side by side, delivered in the same breath. That is not a government holding a line. That is a government managing a timetable. The Cabinet Office is already reviewing automotive and chemicals for the next wave of EU law adoption. The agrifood bill is described as the first in a series of sector-wide deals. The summit planned for the tenth anniversary of the Brexit vote in June is the intended moment for the food and agriculture agreement to be concluded. Sector by sector, law by law, the architecture is being rebuilt. The only question left is pace. Labour's 2024 manifesto was explicit. No return to the single market. No return to the customs union. No freedom of movement. That promise has now been exposed for what it was: not a commitment but a lie, used to neutralise opposition long enough to win the election. Kyle has said the red lines are temporary. Bryant has said the referendum cannot be trusted. Reeves has said she wishes it had gone the other way. The intent is no longer hidden. It is stated plainly, on the record. If the government has stopped pretending, the question is simple. When does the opposition stop pretending too? "Chris Bryant went further, calling the 2016 referendum a pack of lies and refusing to rule out a rejoin pledge."