yakra

43.1K posts

yakra banner
yakra

yakra

@txnoco

memento vivere

× Присоединился Mart 2014
327 Подписки449 Подписчики
yakra
yakra@txnoco·
@Takoluka1 @Review_bra rephrasing the question is admitting that not everyone would make the same decision as you if you asked it word for word.
English
2
0
1
8
Takoluka
Takoluka@Takoluka1·
@txnoco @Review_bra There are two buttons. You press the red button, nothing happens. You press the blue button, you lose some blood, you get a juice box, and you help save someone who needs that blood. If not enough people press the blue button, there is a serious risk that some may die.
English
2
0
0
15
yakra
yakra@txnoco·
@TheActMan_YT i mean yeah but is this the best example when theres "asha sharma, 60, CEO, Xbox" that make up to 90% of the video's context?
English
0
0
0
289
yakra ретвитнул
Senhora RIVOTRIL🚩❤️
Esse vídeo do Lindbergh Farias é sensacional 👏👏👏
Português
50
1.4K
7.2K
101K
yakra ретвитнул
ziggy
ziggy@ziggyrim·
"nós homens não podemos expressar emoções" meu filho tu grita até com a sua mãe
Português
58
6.6K
47.3K
263.4K
yakra
yakra@txnoco·
@Logo_Daedalus saying blue pursues universal recognition is counterproductive since the vote is stated to be secret and a big part of resentment towards them is this false notion that they claim the moral high ground
English
0
0
0
7
R.Сам 🦋🐏
R.Сам 🦋🐏@Logo_Daedalus·
Blue Red test only separates those who are willing to risk their lives in pursuit of universal recognition (blue) & human animals (red). Of course the human animal position is rationalized as “more rational, less risky” in some zero sum game theoretic calculus— & animals are always “rational”— what is “irrational” to the animal is the higher rationality of the Holy Spirit.
English
61
37
630
21.7K
yakra
yakra@txnoco·
@DeltaMapleCake @EditionA3 @ZSVIII @waitbutwhy i already said that gambling is a personal interpretation, not everyone will see it as a gamble, a vote is not a coinflip. yes it is valid to see as a gamble, it is invalid to say everyone also does. do you think anyone not capable of seeing it as a gamble deserve to survive?
English
0
0
0
15
DMC273
DMC273@DeltaMapleCake·
@txnoco @EditionA3 @ZSVIII @waitbutwhy You still fail to grasp how succeeding once at a gamble does not suddenly make it something other than a gamble. You simply either refuse to because you want to argue pointlessly, or you are genuinely too stupid to grasp what is being explained to you.
English
1
0
0
14
Tim Urban
Tim Urban@waitbutwhy·
Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?
English
5.2K
1.2K
10.5K
20.6M
yakra ретвитнул
yakra ретвитнул
Matxzz 土
Matxzz 土@matxzzreceba·
PC GAMING
English
15
207
1.4K
30.2K
yakra
yakra@txnoco·
@DeltaMapleCake @EditionA3 @ZSVIII @waitbutwhy i have never said the word responsible. it is not a "belief", the objective factual stated consequence of a blue majority is everyone survives, anything else, logical or not, is conjecture. "blue = gambling" is a personal interpretation which is not guaranteed to be universal
English
1
0
0
12
DMC273
DMC273@DeltaMapleCake·
@txnoco @EditionA3 @ZSVIII @waitbutwhy That person's contribution to the conversation has done you no favours in understanding the problem. This incessant belief that by some people choosing to gamble with their own lives, that those who choose not to are somehow responsible for those who DO, is why you don't get it.
English
1
0
0
10
Antifederalist Caesar
Antifederalist Caesar@hyperliberalism·
@jon_vs_moloch Okay, the test becomes uninteresting once you make it not a communism, but instead an emergency where 500 million people, through no fault of their own, are murdered unless we press the blue button. Every red button pusher is willing to push the blue button in that scenario.
English
2
0
1
25
Jon 🌌
Jon 🌌@jon_vs_moloch·
Jon 🌌 tweet media
ZXX
49
21
435
13.2K
yakra ретвитнул
𝕊𝕠𝕔𝕚𝕒𝕝𝕚𝕤𝕥 𝕊𝕪𝕤𝕒𝕕𝕞𝕚𝕟 💾
If your clothes are too expensive, then you’re “champagne socialist” but if they’re not expensive enough you’re just envious. Libs are unable to understand Marxism as anything beyond a fashion aesthetic because their own ideological convictions do not run any deeper than that.
Arminho@smallsoat

I find this incredibly funny All Marxists have to do is not openly be consumerists that buy the most expensive thing for no reason but even that is too much to ask of them

English
6
31
289
3.2K