Roman

187 posts

Roman

Roman

@yeapyes

Work Hard Play Hard

Kyiv Присоединился Aralık 2010
508 Подписки80 Подписчики
Roman
Roman@yeapyes·
I just claimed my $BLAST airdrop. Earn over 50% APY on USD by holding $BLAST on Blast Mobile blast.io
English
0
0
0
61
Roman
Roman@yeapyes·
@Moinpasha6 @ItzEbube32 @bigironchris @crako01 @CryptoTeluguO You are a big dreamer. Arbitrum and Optimism with better stats have FDV 6-7B, so why would linea cost 10B? Also, considering rewards for lxp-l, airdrop size will be split into 2. So 0.1$ for LXP will be a gift, but realistically 0.07-0.08$ is more fair price.
English
2
0
1
332
Moin
Moin@Moinpasha6·
@ItzEbube32 @bigironchris @crako01 We can't predict it but .. Let's say LINEA launch at 10B FDV and 10 percent allocated to Airdrop 1 then Airdrop value will be around 1B$.. Now 1B$/3B LXP comes to 0.33$ per LXP .. IF we consider LXP only.. If LXP L are considered then LXP will be below 0.33$ @CryptoTeluguO
English
2
0
1
206
Crako 🍝
Crako 🍝@crako_0·
I used to be bullish #onLinea ecosystem in the first half of 2024, but now I’m unsure where they're headed. The lack of clarity, endless user farming, and the unclear use case for the layer have turned me off. I still believe there's huge potential due to ConsenSys and MM!
English
10
0
23
3.5K
Roman
Roman@yeapyes·
@PrimordialAA @PrimordialAA Put my wallet with others from this cluster in L0 scan, my totally different. I’ve spent like 100$+ on fees with L0, I don’t wanna be now considered as sibyl for all web3.
English
1
0
1
97
Spectrum.eth 🦇🔊
Spectrum.eth 🦇🔊@Spectrum__eth·
Extremely bearish on Layerzero airdrop if the models I’ve seen @PrimordialAA post are close to what will be the official criteria. So many people who have used the network organically will be ineligible because they didn’t spam tx…. What normal person spends $1000 in fees as an example.
English
122
35
388
141.9K
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)
Bryan Pellegrino (臭企鹅)@PrimordialAA·
Provisional Sybil List Nansen Chaos All (Valid and Partially Valid) Bounty Hunter submissions dropbox.com/scl/fo/rz95eb0… We're posting this here for community review. If there is a cluster here that is wrong or a report that can be proven wrong, we will remove it. This is not for individual appeals so it's not on a per address basis. Please list clusters that are clearly wrong and *WHY* the methodology is clearly wrong or how to prove it contains false positives. Please provide feedback within the next 24 hours if possible. There are a few bounty hunter reports that have been approved but have not yet been included in the list, the list may update slightly tomorrow but 99% is here. ALL of these Bounty Hunter reports are running through secondary checks with @nansen_ai and @chaoslabs, any clusters flagged in their automated sybil flows -- we will update the final list with all clusters rejected by the secondary checks after. 1:45am so I will be sleeping for the next few hours. May God have mercy on my notifications for the morning.
English
3.9K
528
2.4K
2.5M
Roman
Roman@yeapyes·
@PrimordialAA Some patterns can be explained by the fact that guides recommend warming up wallets at the beginning of each new month or week. Consequently, similarities in activity spikes may occur during similar time periods (i.e., the first days of the month, new week, etc.).
English
0
0
1
408
Roman
Roman@yeapyes·
@PrimordialAA Some clusters from the report look confident, but some can be accepted with a large stretch. So it should be review very carefully.
English
0
0
0
330
Roman
Roman@yeapyes·
@xFoudres You don't have to worry about Sybils if you have a genuinely good product. Arbitrum is a great example in this regard. After a record airdrop, people continue to use it because it's an excellent product. Whether people will use StarkNet is a big question.
English
1
0
1
262
Foudres
Foudres@xFoudres·
Airdrop from $STRK today, a lot of disappointed users, which is understandable, but above all it shows that we've reached a problematic point in the crypto ecosystem. I'm not an OG of the ecosystem, I arrived rather late (end 2020) but it's enough to have seen the change in trend. At the time, and from my point of view, the Airdrop meta was not as present as it is today. Now it's driving virtually every ecosystem, with user retention becoming increasingly low because they'll be gone to the next one and can sometimes bring technologies that have no business being there at this stage of development, usage and utility, to indecent levels of capitalization. Sybils are becoming more and more numerous and sophisticated, which can be a major risk if they aren't hunted down properly, as can pure farming by real users just looking for magic internet money. Without a real on-chain humanity identity, it's impossible to rewards enthusiastic users of your technology without risking airdropping tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars to robots. Also, Airdrops have transformed an ecosystem of pioneers and people with strong core values about technology, into e-beggars. This is the peak of the "Fake it until your make it" mentality and even the most honest developers in this space have to comply, otherwise they can't compete in terms of adoption and visibility of their tech. Adoption today rhymes with giving away free money and we have to change that, otherwise crypto will stay and will die as a giant internet casino. Our social graph, which originally wanted to get away from this, has simply recreated a new rat race in the metaverse. I'm pretty sure that @Starknet's decision to reward first and foremost its devellopers and core contributors who had to make a difficult choice to position themselves on a brand new technological stack is the right one. Because the sooner we get out of the magic internet money business, the sooner we'll be able to create interesting tools for society as a whole. I expect this cycle and the ensuing bearmarket to be the one of maturation, the one that will be decisive in showing that we've built more than just an on-chain casino, and that this technology has a real future in people's lives, and not just a stupid pump and dump hyper-financialization of absolutely everything. It was a normal phase in this chaotic search for the best technology, but now some are almost mature enough to bring real value to the people on the other side. The degens culture will remain, that's for sure, the giant casino side too, but it will be completely transformed towards a new way of creating, having fun, meeting and collaborating, because there's no reason that's the simple fact of making a few Tx every week on a blockchain should allow you to earn more than the people who create value outside 7 hours a day. So embrace this opportunity while it still exists, but don't forget that it's approaching a breaking point. We're about to enter a phase where creativity will be far more rewarding for everyone than realizing what a robot does better than we do. Exactly as Starknet has chosen to do in part. Learn how to use this tech to create, not to act as a bot.
English
68
59
236
38.5K
kerim
kerim@fenasilerden·
@TPTFootball Wow such a touching and inspiring story to stay where you earn 100k pounds a week to play football
English
7
0
18
0
Players' Tribune Football
Players' Tribune Football@TPTFootball·
‘Today I know I made the right decision, absolutely.’ 🗣 Granit Xhaka
Players' Tribune Football tweet mediaPlayers' Tribune Football tweet mediaPlayers' Tribune Football tweet media
English
130
1.4K
10.9K
0
Roman
Roman@yeapyes·
@oh_that_crab Based on these stats he is mediocre player
English
0
0
0
0
Jérémy Rosman
Jérémy Rosman@KuritoSensei·
#STEPNstats To complete my last tweet on the comparison between the distribution pre-/per-/post-Easter Event, here is the new updated chart on Mystery boxes with data starting only from April 26th (post-Easter). Don't forget to add your runs EVERYDAY on tinyurl.com/stepnstats
Jérémy Rosman tweet media
English
4
11
56
0