AYprotocols®

A lot of traders/degens are asking about bundling and dev sniping. Let’s be clear: We can’t completely stop devs from buying supply at launch. But we can make it harder, more expensive, and less abusive. On most launchpads: With 1 SOL, a dev can grab ~5% of supply instantly. On MoonPad: With 1 SOL, a dev gets closer to ~2% of supply = less manipulation, less farming, better distribution. We also use two bonding curve models: 1) Normal Launch 1 SOL deploy fee Migration to DEX at ~200 SOL liquidity (~$80k–$100k market cap) 2) Verified Launch $5,000 USDC locked Migration to DEX at ~2000 SOL liquidity (~$1M+ market cap) Why this matters? Liquidity > Market Cap. You can fake a $50M market cap with low liquidity… But without real liquidity: - price impact is high - big holders can’t exit - charts collapse on sells MoonPad is designed to: - reduce early supply sniping - increase real liquidity - create healthier price action - align devs with long-term growth In a few hours we will change the rules of the game!

A lot of traders/degens are asking about bundling and dev sniping. Let’s be clear: We can’t completely stop devs from buying supply at launch. But we can make it harder, more expensive, and less abusive. On most launchpads: With 1 SOL, a dev can grab ~5% of supply instantly. On MoonPad: With 1 SOL, a dev gets closer to ~2% of supply = less manipulation, less farming, better distribution. We also use two bonding curve models: 1) Normal Launch 1 SOL deploy fee Migration to DEX at ~200 SOL liquidity (~$80k–$100k market cap) 2) Verified Launch $5,000 USDC locked Migration to DEX at ~2000 SOL liquidity (~$1M+ market cap) Why this matters? Liquidity > Market Cap. You can fake a $50M market cap with low liquidity… But without real liquidity: - price impact is high - big holders can’t exit - charts collapse on sells MoonPad is designed to: - reduce early supply sniping - increase real liquidity - create healthier price action - align devs with long-term growth In a few hours we will change the rules of the game!

In 7 days $RAVE went from $0.25 to over $11 (45x). Everyone is talking about the chart. Nobody is talking about what happened before that. > RaveDAO is a Web3 music protocol. On-chain ticketing, crypto payments at raves, staking revenue from real events. > Partners include Binance, OKX, Bitget, and Warner Music. Real product. Real revenue. $3M in 2025. > Only 24% of the total token supply is actually in circulation. > Pull up Arkham or Etherscan and look at who holds the rest. > Three Gnosis Safe wallets, almost certainly team-controlled, holds 75.2%, 9.87%, and 4.67% of the entire supply. > That is 90% of every $RAVE token in existence sitting with the project. > When you expand to the top 10 wallets, concentration climbs to over 98%. > Now here is the part nobody is talking about. > Roughly 10 hours before the price exploded, wallets linked to the RaveDAO deployer quietly moved 18.58 MILLION tokens to Bitget. > No announcement. No disclosure. Price still under $0.50. > Ten hours later, the price started moving and it didn't stop. > Open interest on $RAVE futures spiked past $200M. RSI pushed above 95. Daily volume hit $270 million, nearly the entire market cap at the time. > 74% of Binance traders were short. $17 million in shorts got liquidated in a single day. > That is not retail finding a gem. > That is a short squeeze triggered on a low float token where the team controls 90% of supply and the exit was already staged on an exchange. > The 752 million tokens still not in circulation are worth roughly $7.5 billion at current prices. > The retail buyers at $8 and $9 thought they were early. They wern't. > The ones who were early moved 18 million tokens to Bitget while nobody was watching. And they still have 752 million more to sell.