Ixcon

“We see what can be……………………….unburdened by what has been.”

@timothyjamaal84 @BrianTe76700431 It’s a cop out or coping mechanism to their other insecurities and failures in life. It’s actually ridiculous for them to have that mindset.

Heteros have this false sense of supremacy and power that when a gay is like “yeah I grew around it but I still want a same sex lover”, it fucks with their heads lol

Oh look ,only gays and lesbians, and no other letters.

HAHAHAHAHAHA 💀💀💀😭

LOL saving this

Christian nationalism sounds appealing, but it's a dangerous pursuit of Christian supremacy. It undermines religious freedom, a cornerstone of America. Plus, those pushing it often don't embody Christian values themselves. #ChristianNationalism #ReligiousFreedom

Bill Maher SLAPS AROUND self identify “Democrat Socialist” David Cross: David Cross: “I’m politically more Democrat Socialist.” Bill Maher: “You’re plainly to the left of me if you even say you’re a socialist.” David Cross: “Well, I said Democratic Socialist.” Bill Maher: “I know what Democratic Socialist is, that’s Mamdani. Who’s a straight up communist.” David Cross: “No he’s not! No he’s not! Bill!” Bill Maher: “He is, first of all. He has someone working for him named Cea Weaver. Have you read about her?” David Cross: “I have not.” Bill Maher: “See, that means you’re in a bubble. Because you should have. Okay, let me tell you who she is. She’s the head of like, ‘We’re going to fix housing.’ This is like what got him elected. [Mamdani] has not disavowed her and I could show you all her tweets that she’s put out over the last few years and quotes, and one of them is ‘elect more communists.’ I don’t think you have to read between the lines if somebody he stands with and by is saying that. And also, her other quotes are like, ‘All home ownership is racist.’” David Cross: “Well, that’s ridiculous.” Bill Maher: “Exactly.” David Cross: “I have an issue with that thing that she said. I don’t know this woman. I will definitely look her up. I’m a fan of Mamdani’s.”

@MuayTysun Riiiight? Because you can’t provide a sound reason to your argument you smear anyone as extremist. Aren’t you leaving? Bye now?

@Agent16258 You’re an extremist And no one redefined anything Foaming at the mouth because gender identity doesn’t fit into your remedial binary understanding

Ah so heterosexuality with extra steps

🎧😌 open.spotify.com/track/7e0fO3Vl…

@MuayTysun The only antigay ones are the those who think they can redefine the word of homosexuality to include the opposite sex in any form. No, you won’t change my mind because your stances make no sense. It has nothing to do with being a zealot.

@Agent16258 No and I have no interest in changing your mind I wouldn’t engage this long with an antigay religious zealot either 🤷🏽‍♂️

@MuayTysun A field marked by interpretive, ideological and political biases

@Agent16258 “ENOUGH” was the operative word You need more to grow Zealotry is the wrong word which you’d be an extremist Your reason isn’t sound and this has nothing to do with feelings You ignore an accredited field of study and engaged in confirmation bias

@MuayTysun *world

@MuayTysun You are also guilty of oversimplifying by creating a broad statement thinking this context applies to that and as you said the word is nuanced. However, not every concepts are nuanced.

@MuayTysun Ha! Way to presume that I haven’t experienced prejudice. What is this the oppression olympics now? So apparently, defending what homosexuality is considered zealotry. Correcting information is now zealotry and you can’t defend your stance with sound reason but appeal to emotion.

@Agent16258 You used gaslighting incorrectly You’ve placed yourself on a pedestal like a pastor preaching homosexuality as the greatest abomination I’m done here You and those zealots are one and the same You haven’t experienced enough prejudice to curb your own Be well

@MuayTysun Pansexual is just being bisexual. If there were three individuals with one female and two males, then they would be in a bisexual relationship.

@MuayTysun They are in a heterosexual relationship because it involves a man and a woman. Hello?

Sociology of what? Your belief in that particular brand of sociology is biased. It is all ideological activism. You mean to tell me that I as a homosexual, would sit idly and let non-homosexuals create false narratives of what homosexuality is. The ones who are weaponizing tenets of that sociological ideology are the trans activists who gaslight and create historical and linguistic revisionism to align with their anti-homosexual beliefs and their selfishness. That “shit” is definitely relevant to communicate sexual boundaries. I and other homosexuals do not have suicidal empathy for those who would redefine what homosexuality is for the sake of gender identity. And reinforce sexual conversion. Homosexuality has nothing to do with any of those sociological constructs (gender) but everything to do with sex (biological reality). And your gaslighting, won’t work here.

@Agent16258 It’s a widely object idea actually gender and sex are different biology vs sociology You ignore sociology and weaponize science to cause harm All that other shit isn’t relevant just be a decent human cause these people didn’t do anything to you

As a fellow homosexual, I agree. Lesbians and gay men are not aesthetics or an ideology. It has nothing to do with how you dress, how you behave, what you believe, what your political affiliations are, etc. It has nothing to do with being masculine, feminine or acting androgynous (gender). But has everything to do with sex (biological traits). It is simply EXCLUSIVE SAME SEX attraction.

Female homosexuality isn't an aesthetic. Female homosexuality isn't an ideology. Female homosexuality is being exclusively same sex attracted, it has never and will never include male anatomy. Stop disrespecting and fetishizing lesbians. Happy lesbian visibility day 💜🪻

By pointing out she’s a female and they have a heterosexual relationship? It’s an objective fact. What’s wrong with raising awareness that they are not homosexual men or that they are in a heterosexual relationship? Are they being impeded in having the ability to marry? Am I telling the state that they cannot have a relationship? There are ignoramuses who need to be schooled what is and what is not homosexuality.

@Agent16258 No I just don’t believe punching down on transmen is right Kinda strips you of the victim defense Transmen come in sit down learn and never try to redefine manhood Transwomen I get the hate but hating transmen? Yea you’re a bully