Arsh
409 posts











Most means more than half. So for POGO it’s anything >50% It’s a common misconception that grade 1 means ‘full view of the cords’ The C&L grading is more often incorrectly quoted then correctly quoted in papers The original Cormack and Lehane paper had multiple issues. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6507827/ One is that thee are no data and wildly inaccurate (overoptimistic) estimates of how infrequent Grade 3 & 4 views are. Estimate grade 3 1:2000 and grade 4 <1:100,000. These are fanciful: grade 3 is 5.8% The second is that the images of grades don’t match the text description. This includes that in the Grade 3 image posterior laryngeal structures are clearly visible The third and final problem with the C&L paper is that the grades don’t correlate with increasing difficulty with intubation. Difficulty increases -mid grade 2 (need a bougie) -in grade 3 if you can’t lift the epiglottis (need to do something fancy) This is resolved by the practical grading published in 2000 by some whippersnapper upstart …-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10… In summary The paper has no data The estimates of incidence are wildly inaccurate The scale is imprecisely described The scale is very poorly remembered and quoted The scale is of very limited practical value Apart from that it’s great… @Anaes_Journal @dasairway




This #RCoA commissioned mixed-methods #systematicreview looks at the role of and working models of non-physician providers of #anaesthesia in high-income countries - what evidence exists in the literature? bjanaesthesia.org.uk/article/S0007-…



A comment which sums up the mad delusion of many on the left. ‘Kindness’ can overcome migrant language issues in the NHS, I’m told. Good luck with that. I’ll go with the doctor who can actually speak English, thanks.




Release of 2025 DAS guidelines! Plan, Peroxygenate, Communicate! Available OA @BJAJournals #WAMM2025



A young doctor asked me, “Why keep reading basic science?” Well, where to start? You never want to reduce your practice to robotically following algorithms and protocols — though those checks and balances have their place in patient care. As a neurologist, I don’t see reading about neuroanatomy, localization in clinical neurology, neurochemistry, physiology, and biochemistry as “going back” to the basics. Basic science enhances your ability as a clinician, a surgeon, or a radiologist. For me, it helps make better sense of patients’ symptoms, exam findings, and imaging results. If you don’t know which lesions cause which symptoms, you can’t connect seemingly isolated findings or unusual presentations. Medicine isn’t just about memorizing patterns — it’s about understanding the underlying systems well enough to navigate the gray areas, interpret data correctly, and choose treatments with insight.


