EndTimesEnjoyer

STOP COMPARING NATIONAL SOCIALIST GERMANY TO MODERN DAY ISRAELIS! Darryl Cooper nails it here. The idea that Germans were killing kids and celebrating like modern day Israelis is a cartoonish version of history, and not real at all. Put down your Robert Maxwell approved textbooks and read some real revisionist sources…

@asadfacts @Eagle220468 Iran exercises significant control over Iraq due to the same shias.... Khomeini was wrong in the 80s...proven right after Saddam fall

I bet no Pakistani mullah ever told you that Saddam’s Iraq had two Shia PMs, a Shia foreign minister, and numerous Shia generals - including his son-in-law, Gen. Maher, Commander of III Corps, who alone was responsible for killing 50k+ Iranian soldiers. Not to mention the tens of thousands of Iraqi Shias who died fighting for Baathist Iraq against Khomeinist Iran. Iraqi Shias - especially the tribal ones and sensible Ayatollahs like Ayatollah Sistani - were pragmatic enough to understand a basic rule of the nation-state era: communities that remain loyal to their states survive. The Khomeinists, blinded by their sectarian lens, assumed Iraqi Shias would mutiny and defect. No wonder Iran failed to capture even an inch of Iraq after eight years and 500k dead.

@rasalghul5353 @faisal_parla both

@faisal_parla Hanged for sheltering osama or failure to protect osama??

If Pakistan had a free democracy, some Of the people of that era should have been hanged.

@ZoomerHistorian So you would prefer losing your entire military equipment to save one soldier....what the fuck that and remaining soldier will use in the event of continuing war which would result in the deaths of even more soldiers...come on man

I'm completely and utterly against this war, but one European life is worth more than all the military equipment in the world.

@Rog3r999 US military is capable enough to destroy all the targets but Iran is also capable enough to respond in kind especially against gulf Arab countries. This means Trump won't do a wholesale attack on electricity infrastructure may be a symbolic strike which IRGC will respond in kind

@CurrentlyStuffx He’s a pussy and US military isn’t strong enough Iran has good AD

He ain't blowing shit

@sami_abid @thewirepak Yeah lol

@CurrentlyStuffx @thewirepak What a stupid take lol

Breakthrough or break through in the next 24 hours over Iran-US war. Pakistan-China back-channels at full throttle with massive push to convince Iranian leadership before Trump’s 48-hour window closes. Regional stability on the line.

I don't think they have lost recently so what the fuck he is on about?

They are smart that's why trump is begging them to open the fucking strait and has extended his deadline like for the fourth time in 10 days

@ZaidJilani Notice they don't deny it, they just call you anti-Semitic for fucking noticing

Former Israeli intelligence and a veteran of AIPACs think tank (WINEP) and the ADL says that Israel’s influence doesn’t exist.

Any US politician who won’t come out against the Israeli War — against this US war in Iran for Israel — is for it. Any saying ‘no forever wars’ or ‘no foreign wars’ without explicitly rejecting Israeli manipulation, even if voicing skepticism of US-Israeli status quo, is for it.

He's bluffing. Iran should not open SOT and prepare for limited ground operation

@faisal_parla Same lol. People worried he will pull off another jon fetterman like stunt are just deeply paranoid...seems like a genuine guy

Honesty thought for a moment he was shaving the guy sitting ahead of him.

The Israel Lobby was a core reason the US, contrary to its security interests, picked a fight with Iran after 9/11. The most reformist president in the history of the Islamic Republic, Muhammad Khatami, was elected in a shocking - Khamenei publicly endorsed his opponent - landslide in 1997 on a platform of normal relations with the West ("dialogue of civilizations"), and was in office through 2005. The Clinton Administration publicly expressed optimism about improved ties between the countries. This was despite the 1996 Khobar Tower Bombings by Saudi Hezbollah, which killed 19 American soldiers and in which the US suspected, but could not to Clinton's satisfaction prove, the IRGC played a role.* After the 9/11 attack by Al Qaeda (Sunni extremists supported by the Taliban), we now had a common enemy with Shiite Iran. The Khatami gov forcefully condemned the attack and organized public protests against 9/11 (which Iranian people also spontaneously condemned in great numbers). In October 2001, the IRGC collaborated with the US in the invasion of Afghanistan (which we attacked for the Taliban's sheltering of Al Qaeda), providing the US intelligence, access to Iranian air space, and coordinating the Northern Alliance to help us overthrow the Taliban, notably leading the 2001 uprising in Herat, where Hazaras, Northern Alliance fighters, and Quds Force elements (under the command of Qasem Soleimani) captured the city from the Taliban. Yet months after Iran helped us in Afghanistan - even as an effective co-belligerent in Herat - Bush slammed the door: the January 2002 “Axis of Evil” speech lumped Iran with Iraq and North Korea as existential threats, with the US promising 'confrontation.' In 2003, Iran's grand-bargain proposal (offering an end to its nuclear program, and even an end to support for Hamas/Hezbollah in exchange for a two-state solution between Israel and Palestine), which sought security guarantees against a US attack, was rejected by the White House. The pivot wasn’t driven by sudden new Iranian aggression; there is no such aggression one can point to in this period. (Tehran was pursuing a nuclear program, but it had for many years, as US Intelligence knew.) It was instead shaped by a network of senior Bush Administration officials who viewed Iran policy through the lens of their deep ideological attachment to Israel and its security interests. These officials included Richard Perle, Douglas Feith, and David Wurmser (@Wurmserscribit), all three of whom were among the eight co-authors of the "Clean Break" memorandum for Benjamin Netanyahu (@netanyahu), which called for overthrowing Saddam Hussein in Iraq and 'engaging' Hezbollah, Syria, and Iran militarily. (Rather odd that three senior US officials were writing policy papers for Netanyahu, about how to ensure Israeli security, a few years before they joined a US Administration, but I digress.) These men won the ideological battle against Bush Administration "realists" like Colin Powell, who favored a much less belligerent stance towards Iran. They persuaded Vice President Cheney in particular, and Bush (at least in the First Term), that Iran must be taken out as part of the Administration's doctrine of pre-emptively eliminating potential enemies after 9/11; and also that Iran would be an ideal staging ground for the Administration's "Freedom Agenda," by which pro-US democracies would be established in the Middle East. However, there can be little doubt from their history that these men were in truth ideologically committed to Israel's interests. The Bush Administration would go on to dramatically intensify sanctions against Iran, as part of the largely successful US policy over the last two decades to impoverish that country. The only reason they didn't invade the country was that, following the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the US military became bogged down in a prolonged, fantastically violent insurgency, in the course of which hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and thousands of US soldiers were killed. In the course of this insurgency, the IRGC funded, trained, and equipped, Shiite militant groups in Iraq that killed hundreds of US soldiers, often via roadside bombs. This was the so-called Iranian "aggression" against the US that is now used to justify the current war of aggression. In reality, the Americans blatantly picked a fight with the Iranians after September 11, who were actively seeking détente. And they did so in large part because of the influence of the pro-Israel Lobby in the Bush Administration. * In assessing the allegation of IRGC involvement, it is noteworthy that the Saudis, who were keen to blame the Iranians for the bombing, refused the US access to a range of critical evidence in this case. Clinton's Defense Secretary during the attack, William J. Perry, did not believe Iran was involved in the attack, and Clinton himself did not believe the evidence was strong enough to justify armed retaliation against Iran.

This is what happens when you let. Pajets in any position of authority...they are brown evengelicucks when it comes to protecting their jew masters

@sami_abid @thewirepak Iran will survive in one form or the other....UAE won't

@CurrentlyStuffx @thewirepak No Iran either if we go by your “logic”

@DavidAFrench @SohrabAhmari US like lost 6 soldiers in rescue but they are hiding it

Yes because planes can be replaced. “I will never leave a fallen comrade” is fundamental to the warrior ethos. It’s part of what should be an unbreakable bond between a warrior and the nation he or she serves.

@RichardHanania Iranians will make the reality of destroying everything in the middle east including oil, electricity and desalination infrastructure. So Trump will TACO

Trump promises to hit every power plant in Iran if Hormuz isn’t opened by Tuesday. If he follows through, he’ll test the theory that the reason the US hasn’t been able to defeat weaker enemies over the years is that it just hasn’t been brutal enough. wsj.com/world/trump-wa…

Trump right now

@clary_co When telling the truth is betrayal then the US was doing something evil and sinister

This is such a gross betrayal of the Iranian protesters permitting them to be perpetually labeled as American stooges.