Dan | Play Solo D&D With Endless RPG

Endless RPG generates D&D 5e or Pathfinder 1e adventures set in a dungeon, tower, crypt, cave, ruins, fortress, etc. Players explore through a fog-of-war, with encounters/traps/treasure/etc. presented as they discover them, which is good for solo play. nations-software.info/2024/08/18/end…

@AttackOnCowboys Giving both firsts hurts you in Free Agency becuase you also have to pay the guy 30m a year. First round draft picks are cheap labor comparitively speaking. Smart move: keep your picks, spend some money for good if not top 5 free agents at multiple positions.

Only way I’m okay with giving both firsts is if the #Cowboys be super aggressive in filling holes in free agency. 🤔👀

@Marcus_Mosher The first question isn't if they are a player away, it's if they are a coach away. There's no doubt that coaching was the #1 problem last year. That said, I wouldn't spend premium draft capitol to help fix the issue. Hitting on 1st round picks is how we afford free agents.

The Cowboys aren't one player away. That's why they can't give up 12 and 20.

No one talks about Bush being the worst president in history that knows anything about history. Both those things in 2026 and 2028 would likely already happen with the possible exception of the 2026 senate, though it was trending that way. The Iran strikes will make it tough for Republicans I 2030 and 2032 as they gain the warmonger stamp again.

If Trump puts boots on the ground in his Iran War: - 2026 = 2006: Dems taking House & Senate - 2028 = 2008: Dems coming for WH & Super Majority And we’ll be talking about Trump as worst President in history more than we did Bush. MAGA searching for answers how it happened:

@Lord_Dylly I think not extending because you can lock someone up for multiple years using tags will hurt you when it comes to getting free agents to come to your team. That’s one reason why a lot of teams don’t do that. Agents want the contract, players listen to agents.

To keep Brandon Aubrey in Dallas, do you prefer: 4 Years $32.5MM $22.75MM GTD $8.13MM AAV OR Second round tender in 2026 ($5.81MM) Franchise Tag in 2027 ($6.97MM) Franchise Tag in 2028 ($8.37MM) #DallasCowboys

@KurtSupeCPA This is a BS post: Given that they could sell it for 700k and the majority of mortgage is actually going into principle (unlike the post suggests), they mostly broke even. And that's with what appears to be a fix-me-upper (high repair cost). Next time, buy a better house.

Client bought a lake house in 2019. $485,000 purchase price. "We'll use it every weekend." They used it 11 times in 5 years. Here's what that lake house actually cost: $31,200/year mortgage $14,400/year property taxes and insurance $8,700/year maintenance and repairs $6,200/year utilities $4,100/year HOA Total: $64,600 a year. They could have rented premium lake houses across the country every single summer for $12,000. And kept the additional compounding in their portfolio with far less problems to deal with. They were tired of the headaches. They just listed it. "We thought it would bring the family together." The family came twice. Real estate feels like an asset BUT it can turn into an expensive hobby with a deed.

@OutlawCowboyNFL I honestly wouldn't mind Downs and Thieneman -- solve your S position for years. The dream duo is Bain and Thieneman, but my gut is Downs and Mesidor.

If the Cowboys were to select 2️⃣ defensive players in the first round, what would YOUR perfect combo be with the 12th and 20th picks❓ I’d go with Caleb Downs and C.J. Allen, personally. The middle of that defense from front to back would be instantaneously solidified.

I've always thought EA Madden misses an opportunity post-Super Bowl. They should release a free agency/draft update and let people take over the build for 2026. They may worry it would take away from the next version's sales, but if they deliver on features, that wouldn't happen.

@DannyPhantom24 Draft Safety / LB, sign Edge and neglect CB. We already have two starting CB (betting on Revel), S is crucial for this defense, LB will likely have best impact if drafting #20 and signing an edge gives us a better idea of what we are getting at the position.

Let's play a game. The Cowboys need help at four defensive positions - edge rusher, linebacker, cornerback, and safety. You get to throw two premium draft picks at two of them, sign a $10M free agent, and one gets neglected. What are you doing?

I’m pretty sure he was thinking: Awesome excuse. Now I can stay home and finally binge watch Pluribus!

Can you, the people, “vote your way out of this?” Honestly, not if you get your news from these folks. The swamp has tricks for deceiving the public, and most even work on congressmen. Here’s an example of how Laura and Greg played along as happy tools of the swamp. Please ask yourself why your own congressman has never talked about this. He either hasn’t gotten this far in the game (80% chance), or he likes the way the swamp obscures what’s going on (10% chance), or he dislikes the system but the price he’d pay for telling you is too high (10% chance). If a congressman sees this post and wants to debate me, I accept! The House has rules we adopt at the beginning of each Congress. Honestly we should just use those - some go all the way back to Thomas Jefferson. Some are like Robert’s Rules of Order which branched from House rules a century ago. But we have a rules committee that modifies the rules every week. I served on the rules committee for two years. When I was on the committee, I refused to vote for rules changes if the purpose was to mislead or obscure. Every week, the rules committee bends the rules to suit the Speaker, but you can’t place the blame just on the committee or the Speaker. Every rules change must be approved by the whole House with a majority vote. Rank and file congressmen are told to vote for these rules modifications each week for the sake of party loyalty because the rules are temporarily modified by the majority to keep the minority from using the permanent rules against us. This is partly true, so most congressmen never question beyond this. Typically, every week the rules committee meets before other committees and writes a rules package to protect bills that will come to the floor that week. Then the whole house votes on this rules package early in the week before significant legislation comes to the floor. The vote is typically on party lines. Sometimes a block of congressmen in the majority will take the rules package hostage and withhold their vote to get something else that has nothing to do with the rules. I’m not a big fan of this, but after 13 years, my hands aren’t completely clean of this tactic. The high-road position that I try to maintain is that if the rules package is bad, you shouldn’t vote for the rules package, and in general you shouldn’t withhold your vote from a rules package if there’s nothing wrong with the rules package… even if you disagree with the policy that is enabled to come to the floor by the rules package. There are more details, but that’s all you need to know to understand what I’m going to explain next. This week the Speaker wanted to do two things outside of our base rules, so he put those inside of the rules package that also had the rules for bringing bills like the popular SAVE Act to the floor, knowing members would be afraid to vote against something associated with SAVE. THIS IS INTENTIONAL. The Speaker wanted to circumvent the National Emergencies Act of 1976 to avoid voting on tariffs and he wanted to turn off the ban on bringing a spending bill to the floor the same day it’s introduced. The first rules package that came to the floor this week failed because myself and other republicans objected to it. The rules committee met again, wrote a new rules package without the tariff-trick, and we voted on the second rules package. I voted no but internet goons, like clockwork, characterized this as a vote against the SAVE Act. The swamp used that second rules package to give them authority to pass a bill before anyone could read it. They hid that authority inside the rule for the SAVE act because they knew people like Laura and Greg would help them disparage anyone who didn’t go along. If you fell for Laura and Greg’s slop you were cheering for the Pelosi doctrine that we should pass bills to see what’s in them. If the rules package had failed, the rules committee would have written a better one and SAVE Act would have still come to the floor.

@rjochoa @JonahJavad UPDATE: Dallas actually did *NOT* go to the playoffs with George Pickens. If you check the stats, Pickens recorded 0 pass breakups, 0 ints, 0 sacks and 0 sacks. It's crazy to think his signing is going to do anything to help our defense.

Awesome question from @JonahJavad: Jerry Jones noted that Dallas trading Micah Parsons made signing someone like George Pickens to a long-term deal possible. Jonah asked Jerry if, having traded Micah, not signing Pickens would be a failure in this scenario. Jerry predictably avoided it and referenced the salary cap and that the team would have to decide if they had the room under the cap going forward. Stephen Jones jumped in to try and save the day and noted that Dallas gave up a third-round pick and referenced his precious compensatory picks they may get if George leaves.

@BobbyBeltTX No excuse for the 2025 defense. It’s one thing to dip with new scheme. It’s another not to fit scheme with talent and to have continual confusion throughout the season.

Absolutely could not run it back in 2026. I think they'll take about 7-10 days to go through their interview process, and I bet they have a hire by the end of next week. This will be Brian Schottenheimer's hire.

@AndrewBrandt Players get a % of revenue. If the NFL makes more money, the players make more money. Not too hard to understand.

I'm old enough to remember when there was no 17th game in the NFL. Still trying to figure out what the players got in return.

@awfulannouncing Georgia ended up with an offensive play and could have won the game on it. This complaint is like saying that if you go up by 3 and there's only 1 second on the clock you shouldn't need to kickoff.

And here's the *official* ending after a bit of chaos. Sean McDonough: "Matt, this is feeling like an excruciating ending to a classic game. Does common sense need to prevail here?" Matt Austin: "Well, yes, but we do have rules we have to follow." 🏈🦓🎙️ #CFP

@ScottKacsmar Normally we get 4 games. So I guess the point here is that streaming allows people more choice besides the 4 we usually get?

To watch NFL Week 17 you just need: Netflix Prime Video NFL Network Peacock/NBC FOX CBS ESPN

How smart is Grok? About as good as an 8-year-old accountant. I tried to get Grok to give me a running total of my credit card bill via a CSV of the debits and credits. First, it skipped a bunch of rows with "see more rows" that didn't open up to show them. Next, it didn't properly subtract credits from debits. I tried twice telling it they were in different columns, it still couldn't handle it. And THIS is what is going to take all of our jobs soon?

@SandyofCthulhu But they can become skeletons...

D&D Trolls can’t become zombies because they regenerate, so to be killed their bodies must be destroyed by acid or fire. Unless some weak-ass later edition I’m unaware of emasculated them. We always played that trolls regenerate from everything.

@Dexerto I can’t wait until we do the same with law enforcement and the justice department. Instant execution + a “sorry, you’ve exhausted all possible recourses” said using a pirated version of scarlett johanson’s voice.

MoistCr1TiKaL has blasted YouTube's CEO for allowing AI to ban channels "AI should never be able to be the judge, jury, and executioner. It should never have the ability to terminate a channel"

@Pirat_Nation Poor Geoff :(

@DaddyWarpig Haven’t seen it, but from what I’ve heard, you’ve had a bad 10 days!

I'm about to watch Borderlands. Because after the last 10 days of my life, it'll be a step up.