David Daze

Been feeling sick lately so

@RLMaxiimalist @alfkkifine “I’d rather want babies to come to life and suffer than for them to not have to deal with unnecessary suffering”

@alfkkifine “We should just kill kids because we don’t take care of them properly”

they’re full of crap.

@RichardMortimir @cremieuxrecueil @mfacehero I’m sure these analogies (that don’t even get it right in the first place) go hard for people who are illiterate

@cremieuxrecueil @mfacehero

Red and blue button pushers: who's smarter? In a mostly-subscriber sample who took a brief verbal IQ test, the answer is... Blue pushers! If the whole population has an IQ of 100 with an SD of 15, their mean IQ would be 101.9, versus 97.0 for reds.

@megh_wright Strong-willed Queen

if you know her or you are her please reach out to me I want to meet her so bad

@localchaos_ Pee See

Do I spend my tax return on a new pc and actually start streaming?? Or do I spend it on a vacation??

@_X_UnKn0wn_ @thesabrinabanks @overtflow Because of people like you

@thesabrinabanks @overtflow Fucking crazy that your kid will have to deal with their mom being famous for being an internet prostitute

🚨HUGE ANNOUNCEMENT 🚨 If you didn’t know, now ya know 😜 I’m very pregnant 🤰🏼👶🏻🍼

@Masitk1 @alfkkifine Consenting to sex is not consenting to pregnancy

@alfkkifine You had control over your body before you got pregnant. Stop killing babies for your convenience.

Abortion is valid and okay even if the pregnancy didn’t come from rape or involve a minor. “If the mother simply doesn’t want the baby,” that’s valid. “If she’s not financially, mentally, or physically able to raise a child,” that’s valid. “If the father leaves and she can’t or doesn’t want to raise the baby alone,” that’s valid. “If she’s struggling with addiction that could affect the child,” that’s valid. “If the fetus has serious health issues and abortion is needed,” that’s valid. People need to understand that a woman doesn’t have to be harmed or violated to have control over her own body. If you’re thinking about children, you should also think about the mother. Save the tree, not just the apple.

@ValerieC_TX @alfkkifine Bio checks out

No, no its not. People get mad at women who lose control and fall into mental illness and drug addiction. But not when she falls into self-destruction and violates her own body? Telling them its an option is practically telling them go be a whore and risk getting STDs. All cause you wana get paid with idiotic rage bait. Smh

If rape doesnt upset you but abortion does, you never cared about human life.

@TheTarch @chaitinsgoose The consequences of choice are quite literallly 1 to 1. Candidate B (red) lives no matter what happens Candidate A (blue) only gets to join red and lives when they get the most votes

@chaitinsgoose This is not isomorphic to the original. In the original, it would be akin to electing the entity that foisted the dilemma on everyone in the first place. Resisting tyranny is much more obviously worth dying for.

i realized framing impacts me too there is an election. if candidate A wins, nothing happens. if candidate B wins, he kills all those who voted A. who do you vote for?

@CashmereWitch @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj And what the fuck do you think blue being above 50% entails for red pressers? If it’s a one way thing where only blue can die, what is the literal only logical conclusion that entails for red? That red is the only option which can kill.

@DavidDazeX @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj No. Only Blue needs to be pressed above %50 for all to live. You want everyone to live, press red, which is automatically stay alive.

Red is the only button that can cause others to die. It’s that simple

@SlimeDuncan2 @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj Forgot your piece of shit failing moral grandstand. Why does blue not have 100% guaranteed survival? Could it be that there’s another option that’s…. Oh idk…. Killing them?

@DavidDazeX @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj Because they chose to gamble with their life when they could have chose red and had 100% guaranteed survival.

@SlimeDuncan2 @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj And why does blue die?

@DavidDazeX @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj No, the blues killed themselves by picking blue in the first place.

@DJKeenstar @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj And there’s only one option that actively causes the other to get killed when it has the majority, which is red, so red kills

@DavidDazeX @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj The only way *you* can die is choosing blue. If you chose red, there's a zero percent chance of dying

@rendern5000 @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj Dude, idgaf about your delusional dumb ass rhetoric, there’s only button in the scenario that kills people and that’s read, red as the majority is the only way in which deaths occur, cry about it, cope, idc, you get scared over the littlest things and call it anger lmaoooo

@DavidDazeX @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj Again, please grow up or actually visit an anger management course. Maybe some academia classes as well, to help you reason better. You have also still yet to engage a single point I made. Even when I answered yours so many times already…

@rendern5000 @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj Then you reject reality, and I’m not going to waste my time on someone as delusional as you lmao foh

@DavidDazeX @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj Nope. The only way someone dies if anyone is voting blue. If everyone votes red, everyone lives too. Again, you are not at all engaging or just understanding it. And again, gane theory tells us. Defintiviely. That the optimal strategy is choosing red.

@rendern5000 @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj So you can understand that voting red is the only way anyone dies, THEREFORE: Red voters are the ones causing people to die, they are the killers In a world of minimizing deaths, the only right answer is blue

@DavidDazeX @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj In that framing, red. However you could equally frame it "Which minority vote kills itself?" And you would end up with blue. Again, those are not unrelated. Everyone choosing blue is putting someone at risk, with the only potential save of enough people doing the same. Happy?

@rendern5000 @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj Here, look, I’ll help you There’s 2 options in the scenario, the red button, and the blue button. Which majority of the two when pressed causes the other to be killed?

@DavidDazeX @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj Ah you don't even notice anymore when you insult someone. Got it. You seem to be under the impression, that I need those other scenarios; I don't. You do. Because you cannot grasp the one presented to you fully. How many times do I need to answer? Are you incapable of reading?

@rendern5000 @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj Notice how I don’t need to present you an analogy? Notice how I don’t need to jump to insults? Notice how I don’t need to make up another scenario? Notice how you can’t answer a simple answer honestly? Which majority choice ends up killing the other?

@DavidDazeX @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj And you most certainly need an analogy, since you don't seem to grasp the concept of the question.

@rendern5000 @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj Because if your bullshit sad excuse of a scenario, I can stick to the original because I don’t need a dumb analogy So say, which majority vote ends up killing the other?

@DavidDazeX @EckhartAurelius @esjesjesj Again; not engaging