PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ

13K posts

PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ banner
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ

PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ

@DefiPhilosopher

📊📉📈Seeking Opportunities across Web3,Crypto/Blockchain , Artificial Intelligence , Robotics and Future TechnologiesðŸ›ĄïļðŸ§

Nigeria āđ€āļ‚āđ‰āļēāļĢāđˆāļ§āļĄ KasÄąm 2023
6.4K āļāļģāļĨāļąāļ‡āļ•āļīāļ”āļ•āļēāļĄ555 āļœāļđāđ‰āļ•āļīāļ”āļ•āļēāļĄ
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ āļĢāļĩāļ—āļ§āļĩāļ•āđāļĨāđ‰āļ§
P.S. I Love ME
P.S. I Love ME@ps_ilove_me·
Doomscrolling destroys the one thing ancient cultures considered most sacred: the integrity of your inner temple. Every wisdom tradition understood that consciousness wasn’t just awareness. It was a consecrated space that required careful curation of what was allowed to enter. The Greeks called this “mneme” - not just memory, but the deliberate cultivation of what deserves to be remembered. Roman orators spent years training their minds like architects designing sacred buildings. They created “memory palaces” - elaborate mental structures where only the most important knowledge was permitted residence. Every piece of information had to earn its place through repeated contemplation and integration with existing wisdom. They understood something we’ve forgotten: your consciousness becomes identical to what you repeatedly allow into it. Doomscrolling inverts this ancient principle entirely. Instead of carefully selecting what deserves mental residence, you open your consciousness to a fire hose of random information that demands attention but deserves none. Ancient philosophers would be horrified not by the content of what you’re consuming, but by the complete abandonment of discernment about what belongs in your mind. Marcus Aurelius wrote his Meditations as daily exercises in consciousness curation. Each entry was him deliberately choosing which thoughts deserved his attention and which should be dismissed as “vain imaginings.” He treated his mind like a fortress that required constant vigilance about what was permitted entry. Doomscrolling is the opposite: throwing open the gates and inviting every passing thought, emotion, and reaction to take up permanent residence. Buddhist monks spent lifetimes mastering “mindfulness” - not the watered-down modern version, but the rigorous practice of watching what arises in consciousness and choosing what to feed with continued attention. They knew that whatever you attend to grows stronger. Whatever you ignore eventually fades. Doomscrolling feeds everything equally. You give the same quality of attention to genuine crises and manufactured outrage, to problems you can solve and problems that don’t actually exist, to information that improves your life and information that only increases your suffering. Ancient wisdom keepers understood that consciousness without curation becomes chaos. They developed elaborate practices - meditation, prayer, philosophical dialogue, contemplative reading - specifically to maintain the sacred order of their inner world. We’ve replaced these practices with aalgorthmic feeds designed by people who profit from your psychological disorder. The Sufis had a teaching: “Your heart is a polished mirror. You must wipe it clean of the dust that has settled upon it, because it is destined to reflect the light of divine secrets.” Doomscrolling doesn’t just add dust to the mirror. It convinces you that dust is what mirrors are supposed to reflect. Ancient cultures treated consciousness like a garden that required constant tending. They knew that if you don’t deliberately plant what you want to grow, weeds will take over everything. Your consciousness has become a wilderness of weeds that you mistake for staying informed. The ancients were right. Your inner world is sacred space. What you allow to dwell there shapes not just how you think, but who you become. Doomscrolling desecrates that space by treating it like a garbage dump for every piece of information that demands attention. Your ancestors would weep.
Darshak Rana ⚡ïļ@thedarshakrana

ðŸšĻThe most dangerous thing you can do to your consciousness is doomscrolling. You think you’re observing reality. But, you’re actually living inside a simulation designed to make you forget what reality feels like. Every time you scroll through curated feeds of global disasters, you’re witnessing a carefully constructed representation of the world, filtered through editorial decisions, engagement metrics, and profit motives you never see. The information flowing through your device carries the psychological fingerprints of every system designed to keep you scrolling. You’ve never actually experienced 99% of the events that shape your worldview. Everything you “know” about reality beyond your immediate environment comes through screens controlled by corporations optimizing for your continued engagement, not your accurate understanding. Your consciousness of global events gets entirely mediated by systems that make money when you feel anxious, angry, or obsessed. Your perception of reality becomes literally sponsored by entities whose business model requires your mental disturbance. Andâ€Ķthis artificial reality feels more real than actual reality. The curated stream of crises feels more urgent than the conversation with your friend. The distant disaster feels more important than the local problem you could actually solve. The virtual outrage feels more meaningful than the present moment you’re actually living. Your consciousness gets trapped in a kind of meta-reality where consuming information about life replaces actually living life. Where reacting to representations of events replaces participating in actual events. Where feeling informed replaces being effective. Ancient spiritual traditions warned about this exact trap. Maya in Hinduism. Samsara in Buddhism. The Cave in Plato’s Republic. All describe the same phenomenon: consciousness becoming so absorbed in illusions that it forgets its own direct experience of existence. Doomscrolling represents the technological perfection of that ancient trap. You scroll through disasters happening to other people and feel like you’re experiencing something important. Meanwhile, you’re sitting in a chair, staring at light patterns on glass, having emotional reactions to stories about events you will never directly encounter involving people you will never meet in places you will never visit. Your nervous system responds as if these stories are your lived reality. Your consciousness accepts these mediated experiences as genuine knowledge. Your identity becomes shaped by your reactions to simulations rather than your engagement with actual existence. The matrix exists every moment you choose the feed over the present, the screen over the room, the story about life over life itself. The red pill? Simply turning off the device and remembering that your consciousness exists independent of any information system designed to capture it. Reality doesn’t need updates. Consciousness doesn’t need feeds. Existence doesn’t require commentary. The world you can touch, smell, and directly influence has always been more real than the world you can only scroll through.

English
9
121
656
37.2K
Wittig Lyon
Wittig Lyon@ibn_wittig·
For space enthusiasts Should we host a space for the Artemis II landing tonight 11:30pm start time? Will you join? We'll be discussing the essence of the mission, why are we even trying to get to the moon, what are the importance of space exploration and commentary on the landing Sounds like fun?
English
38
29
180
3.3K
Priscilla
Priscilla@IamPrisea·
@zikohercules I learnt most of these things by watching a documentary called "how the universe works." People around me would yell and whine that they want to watch Action movies or Africa magic. They are the types that make uninformed assertions and ask dumbfounding questions.
English
3
0
26
539
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ āļĢāļĩāļ—āļ§āļĩāļ•āđāļĨāđ‰āļ§
Gregg Caruso
Gregg Caruso@GreggDCaruso·
Thousands of people are selling their identities to train AI – but at what cost? Gig AI trainers worldwide are selling moments of their lives, including calls and texts, to AI companies for quick cash | theguardian.com/technology/202â€Ķ
English
0
2
3
440
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ@DefiPhilosopher·
@DohaDebates Omg ðŸ˜ĒNick is dead ?? Just watch his debate on your channel last week RIP Nick Pope
English
0
0
1
37
Doha Debates
Doha Debates@DohaDebates·
We extend our heartfelt condolences to the loved ones of Nick Pope, a brilliant guest and curious mind who brought so much to our debate table. We're grateful to have been part of what would ultimately be his final overseas journey. How fitting Nick's final trip was spent doing what he loved most, pondering life's biggest questions. Rest in peace, Nick.🕊ïļ Here's Nick's appearance on our debate: youtube.com/watch?v=9OhYOuâ€Ķ
YouTube video
YouTube
Nick Pope@nickpopemod

My final overseas trip was to take part in a fascinating @DohaDebates discussion on the societal implications of encountering beings more intelligent than ourselves. What do you think would happen? See if our ideas align with yours! youtube.com/dohadebates

English
1
1
4
1.6K
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ@DefiPhilosopher·
Days 5 Of learning Python fundamentals to power my journey into AI/ ML
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ tweet media
English
0
0
1
16
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ āļĢāļĩāļ—āļ§āļĩāļ•āđāļĨāđ‰āļ§
Akintola Steve
Akintola Steve@Akintola_steve·
If you’re just getting into tech or you’re confused about where to start, read this: First, drop the idea that you need to know everything before you begin. You don’t. Pick one path and commit to it, whether it’s frontend, backend, data, mobile, or design. Clarity comes from doing, not overthinking. Second, stop jumping from one tutorial to another. Tutorials feel productive, but they can trap you. Learn the basics, then start building. Even if it’s messy. Even if it breaks. That’s where real growth happens. Third, don’t chase trends, chase fundamentals. Languages, frameworks, toolsâ€Ķ they come and go. But problem-solving, logic, and understanding how systems work will always pay off. Fourth, be ready to feel lost. That confusion you feel? It’s part of the process. Every solid engineer you admire has been there. The difference is, they didn’t quit. Fifth, consistency beats intensity. You don’t need 10 hours a day. You need steady effort, every day. Small progress compounds faster than random bursts of motivation. Lastly, build in public if you can, but don’t confuse noise for progress. Focus on getting better, not just being seen. Start small. Stay consistent. Keep building.
English
7
12
54
1.1K
Python Coding
Python Coding@clcoding·
Python libraries used for nuclear physics
Python Coding tweet media
English
4
25
204
8.3K
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ@DefiPhilosopher·
Not all Vibecoders know this. That's why learning the fundamental is important
Kamal Gurjar@KamalGurjar8

@PythonPr Answer: Same In Python, 10 (int) and 10.0 (float) are considered equal in value. So: 10 == 10.0 → True Even though their types are different, Python compares the numeric value, not the type here.

English
0
0
0
8
Jimmy Fikes
Jimmy Fikes@akajim·
@PythonPr The equality operator can be used to compare ints with floats. So, 10 is the 'Same' as 10.0
English
1
0
2
789
Python Programming
Python Programming@PythonPr·
What is the output of the following Python code, and why? Comment your answers below!
Python Programming tweet media
English
16
9
123
13.4K
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ@DefiPhilosopher·
What if the logic changes to if 10 is 10.0 Will "is" change the output of the logic or does python consider it not equal due to different location in memory? Want to know the answer , join us @clcoding to be grounded in Analytical thinking on python
Kamal Gurjar@KamalGurjar8

@PythonPr Answer: Same In Python, 10 (int) and 10.0 (float) are considered equal in value. So: 10 == 10.0 → True Even though their types are different, Python compares the numeric value, not the type here.

English
0
0
0
8
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ@DefiPhilosopher·
@KamalGurjar8 @PythonPr What if the logic changes to if 10 is 10.0 Will "is" change the output of the logic or does python consider it not equal due to different location in memory?
English
0
0
0
27
Kamal Gurjar
Kamal Gurjar@KamalGurjar8·
@PythonPr Answer: Same In Python, 10 (int) and 10.0 (float) are considered equal in value. So: 10 == 10.0 → True Even though their types are different, Python compares the numeric value, not the type here.
English
2
0
6
1.1K
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ@DefiPhilosopher·
Comes to Training Ai models. The question is in your day to day activities ,How well to you pay attention to Details??
English
0
0
0
5
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ@DefiPhilosopher·
Right and 3rd from the left( which will print a "TRUE" Value from python logical operator POV,sorry for digressing a little 😊 ).Yes ,Eric's body language as he was speaking was not in synchronization ( did you notice?).This is one traits Ai companies are scouting for when it
English
1
0
0
7
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ@DefiPhilosopher·
How well do you Pay attention to Details?? While I was watching the movie "Industry" season 3,episode 3. The scene where Eric Tao Henry, Anna, where hosted in a Panel session discussing about PierPoint Role in Lumia Energy IPO launch shows a Eric's body language(2nd from the
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ tweet media
English
1
0
0
15
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ@DefiPhilosopher·
Day 4 of learning Python with @clcoding Todays topic is about taking data given by the user to the python program
PaschalIfeanyiðŸĶ tweet media
English
0
0
1
9