De KritischeMakelaar 🇺🇦

31.3K posts

De KritischeMakelaar 🇺🇦 banner
De KritischeMakelaar 🇺🇦

De KritischeMakelaar 🇺🇦

@FouteMakelaar

De KritischeMakelaar: Groep (ex)verhuurders die met een kritische blik naar de verhuurmarkt kijkt....... kijkt u met ons mee?

Nederland เข้าร่วม Ekim 2011
8.7K กำลังติดตาม7.9K ผู้ติดตาม
De KritischeMakelaar 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
Maarten van Rossem
Maarten van Rossem@maartenpodcast·
Keer op keer kiest de VVD voor partijbelang boven landsbelang. We hebben geen kabinet dat de puinhopen opruimt, omdat de VVD liever politieke spelletjes speelt dan verantwoordelijkheid neemt. Een brevet van onvermogen. open.spotify.com/episode/5IqiWn…
Nederlands
56
169
457
8.2K
De KritischeMakelaar 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
dr. Marina
dr. Marina@mmeeuw·
Phlippen -Hoofdeconoom ABN Amro - “Sanchez durft het aan om te zeggen: tot hier en niet verder tegen Putin en de VS. Hoe verder je bent met de energietransitie hoe minder kwetsbaar je bent voor regimes en zo’n oorlog. Hoe meer je kunt zeggen voor welke waarden je staat.
Nederlands
121
98
363
36K
De KritischeMakelaar 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
Maarten van Rossem
Maarten van Rossem@maartenpodcast·
De alliantie tussen Trump en Israël is de grootste bedreiging voor onze veiligheid. Dat een couppleger nog vrij rondloopt, bewijst hoe kapot het Amerikaanse systeem is. Trump had al lang gediskwalificeerd en ingesloten moeten worden. Amerika is een schande voor de democratie.
Nederlands
528
417
1.7K
56.1K
De KritischeMakelaar 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
Kirsten Verdel
Kirsten Verdel@locuta·
Ik schreef vandaag over de Vloek van Vance. En over onderstaande punten. Ook lezen? Meld je alsnog aan voor mijn wekelijkse nieuwsbrief over Trump en ik stuur ‘m na: laposta.nl/f/ssdcuilbrm7u
Leontine Mulder@LeontineMulder

@locuta De Straat van Hormuz is dicht/open, oorlogen zijn gewonnen/verloren en wapenstilstanden gelden wel/niet. Trump als Jezus of/dokter. Niemand snapt er iets van. Maar goed nieuws: niemand lacht meer om Amerika. 😂 Dank @locuta voor weer een heerlijke nieuwsbrief 🙌

Nederlands
3
12
51
7K
De KritischeMakelaar 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
Protect Kamala Harris ✊
Protect Kamala Harris ✊@DisavowTrump20·
RETWEET if you stand with Pope Leo against Donald Trump!
Protect Kamala Harris ✊ tweet media
English
2.5K
41.9K
101.5K
986K
De KritischeMakelaar 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
Jelmer Visser
Jelmer Visser@DieTukkerfries·
“Das pech alle zetels weg”
Jelmer Visser tweet media
Deutsch
14
50
658
6.6K
De KritischeMakelaar 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
rob de wijk
rob de wijk@robdewijk·
Poetin, Trump, Vance, Weidel, Le Pen, Wilders en nog wat ‘leiders met ballen’ hebben het afgelegd tegen het Hongaarse volk dat genoeg had van de corruptie en de Russische invloed. Een mooie dag voor de rechtstaat en democratie waar Wilders zich wederom buiten plaatst.
Nederlands
0
85
530
14.8K
De KritischeMakelaar 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
Don Winslow
Don Winslow@donwinslow·
Honestly, I cannot believe 77 million Americans voted for this absolute fucking clown.
English
9.9K
17.7K
98.6K
2.3M
De KritischeMakelaar 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
De Speld
De Speld@DeSpeld·
Dear President @realdonaldtrump this is what our failing right leader @GeertWilders is doing, desperately seeking attention ratting out our prime minister and perfectly willing to hurt our national interests. Please don’t trust him, he is the biggest loser of the last elections, a fake nationalist like yourself, with no friends left. Sad and pathetic! Thank for your attention to this matter.
Geert Wilders@geertwilderspvv

Dear President @realDonaldTrump this is what the new Dutch Prime Minister @MinPres Jetten wrote about you after you won the elections in November 2024: “Trump, a convicted criminal, becomes president of the US. A misogynist who wants to take away hard-won freedoms, such as abortion. A man who openly flirts with dictators. What lies ahead are years of chaos, division, and recklessness.” Please don’t trust him, the man is a leftish liberal politician and an enemy of the people and he hates your guts. He is now also attacking @PM_ViktorOrban who is a thousand times better leader then Jetten himself.

English
260
470
3.4K
238.5K
De KritischeMakelaar 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
rob de wijk
rob de wijk@robdewijk·
Totaal gebrek aan inzicht hoe je dat militair moet doen. VS kan de straat niet openhouden, vraagt het bondgenoten die het ook niet kunnen. Bovendien wilde Europa deze oorlog niet. Stop met dit soort ononderbouwde meningen @sypwynia
Nederlands
0
121
808
48K
De KritischeMakelaar 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
Ilan Goldenberg
Ilan Goldenberg@ilangoldenberg·
Three weeks into the war with Iran, a number of observations as someone who spent years war-gaming this scenario. 1. The U.S. and Israel may have produced regime transition in the worst possible way. Ali Khamenei was 86 and had survived multiple bouts of prostate cancer. His death in the coming years would likely have triggered a real internal reckoning in Iran, potentially opening the door to somewhat more pragmatic leadership, especially after the protests and crackdown last month. Instead, the regime made its most consequential decision under existential external threat giving the hardliners a clear upperhand. Now we appear to have a successor who is 30 years younger, deeply tied to the IRGC, and radicalized by the war itself – including the killing of family members. Disastrous. 2. About seven years ago at CNAS, I helped convene a group of security, energy, and economic experts to walk through scenarios for a U.S.--Iran war and the implications for global oil prices. What we’re seeing now was considered one of the least likely but worst outcomes. The modeling assumed the Strait of Hormuz could close for 4–10 weeks, with 1–3 years required to restore oil production once you factored in infrastructure damage. Prices could spike from around $65 to $175–$200 per barrel, before eventually settling in the $80–$100 range a year later in a new normal. 3. One surprising development: Iran is still moving oil through the Strait of Hormuz while disrupting everyone else. In most war games I participated in, we assumed Iran couldn’t close the Strait and still use it themselves. That would have made the move extremely self-defeating. But Iran appears capable of harassing global shipping while still pushing some of its own exports through. That changes the calculus. 4. The U.S. now finds itself in the naval and air equivalent of the dynamic we faced in Iraq and Afghanistan. It’s a recipe for a quagmire where we win every battle and lose the war. We have overwhelming military dominance and are exacting a tremendous cost. But Iran doesn’t need to win battles. They just need occasional successes. A small boat hitting a tanker. A drone slipping through defenses in the Gulf. A strike on a hotel or oil facility. Each incident creates insecurity and drives costs up while remind everyone that the regime is surviving and fighting. 5. The deeper problem is that U.S. objectives were set far too high. Once “regime change” becomes the implicit or explicit goal, the bar for American success becomes enormous. Iran’s bar is simple: survive and keep causing disruption. 6. The options for ending this war now are all bad. You can try to secure the entire Gulf and Middle East indefinitely – extremely expensive and maybe impossible. You can invade Iran and replace the regime, but nobody is seriously going to do that. Costs are astronomical. You can try to destabilize the regime by supporting separatist groups. It probably won’t work and if it does you’ll most likely spark a civil war producing years of bloody chaos the U.S. will get blamed for. None of these are good outcomes. 7. The other escalatory options being discussed are taking the nuclear material out of Esfahan or taking Kargh Island. Esfahan is not really workable. Huge risk. You’d have been on the ground for a LONG time to safely dig in and get the nuclear material out in the middle of the country giving Iran time to reinforce from all over and over run the American position. 8. Kharg Island can be appealing to Trump. He’d love to take Iran’s ability to export oil off the map and try to coerce them to end the war. It’s much easier because it’s not in the middle of IRan. But it’s still a potentially costly ground operation. And again. Again, the Iranian government only has to survive to win and they can probably do that even without Kargh. 9. The least bad option is the classic diplomatic off-ramp. The U.S. declares that Iran’s military capabilities have been significantly degraded, which is how the Pentagon always saw the purpose of the war. Iran declares victory for surviving and demonstrating it can still threaten regional actors. It would feel unsatisfying. But this is the inevitable outcome anyway. Better to stop now than after five or ten more years of escalating costs. Remember in Afghanistan we turned down a deal very early in the war with the Taliban that looked amazing 20 years later. Don’t need to repeat that kind of mistake. 10. The U.S. and Israel are not perfectly aligned here. Trump just needs a limited win and would see long-term instability as a negative whereas for Netanyahu a weak unstable Iran that bogs the U.S. down in the MIddle East is a fine outcome. If President Trump decided he wanted Israel to stop, he likely has the leverage to push it in that direction just as he pressured Netanyahu to take a deal last fall on Gaza. 11. When this is over, the Gulf states will have to rethink their entire security strategy. They are stuck in the absolute worst place. They didn’t start this war and didn’t want it and now they are taking with some of the worst consequences. Neither doubling down with the U.S. and Israel nor placating the Iranians seems overwhelmingly appealing. 12. One clear geopolitical winner so far: Russia. Oil prices are rising. Sanctions are coming off. Western attention and military resources are shifting away from Ukraine. From Moscow’s perspective, this war is a win win win. 13. At some point China may have a role to play here. It is the world’s largest oil importer, and much of that supply comes from the Middle East. Yes they are still getting oil from Iran. But they also buy from the rest of the Middle East, and a prolonged disruption in the Gulf hits Beijing hard. That gives China a real incentive to help push toward an end to the conflict.
English
458
2.3K
7.4K
2M
De KritischeMakelaar 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
💕 Brittany Belle 💕
💕 Brittany Belle 💕@BrittanyinTexas·
Well done, London. 👏 These campaigns are very powerful.🔥
English
92
1.3K
3.2K
62.2K
De KritischeMakelaar 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
Ounka
Ounka@OunkaOnX·
ZXX
23
2.2K
8.6K
106.5K
De KritischeMakelaar 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
PG Kroeger
PG Kroeger@PGKroeger·
Wat een compliment, zeker als je iets weet van de historie van deze verzetskrant uit de gereformeerde wereld. Door rechtsextremisten zo goor en ongelikt verfoeid te worden is een eer.
PG Kroeger tweet media
Nederlands
33
46
211
5.9K
De KritischeMakelaar 🇺🇦 รีทวีตแล้ว
rob de wijk
rob de wijk@robdewijk·
Ik doe het voor mijn goedwillende volgers. Mijn account is gekaapt door radicaal rechtse, feitenvrije types, provocateurs, opruiers en pro-Russische trollen.
Nederlands
0
33
587
41.3K