Funkee Studio

Poor lad. The amount of abuse he got this morning. 😂😅😂😅😂😅😂😅😂😅😂😅😂😂😂😂 Linktr.ee/FunkeeStudio Footydezigns.redbubble.com

Tweet of the day! Thanks for the laugh Mike

And thats not including freezing pensioners, blocking and reversing brexit, covering up for pedophiles, ignoring our 100s of 1000s of raped and abused children in the name of diversity and keeping the enemy voting for your party. 🎶 @Keir_Starmer a wank*r.🎶

👀🤯

If you possible can, please attend this celebration of patriotism. Don’t let Starmer scare you off.

London mayor Sadiq Khan has said that he would like to see Andy Burnham return to Parliament “as soon as possible”.

🚨 JUST IN: UK PM Keir Starmer announces he’s BANNING people from traveling there to attend Tommy Robinson’s peaceful patriot rally Starmer smears them as “far right” RESIGN NOW, KEIR! You’re gonna put MORE travel controls on patriots than 3rd world Muslims?! Unbelievable. Keep pushing, @TRobinsonNewEra! 🇺🇸 🇬🇧

The local elections show the scale of the Conservative challenge. The route back is not narrower politics. It is a broader coalition. Speak to young people, parents, workers, business owners and voters who walked away. Make the economy work for them.

We are a reasonable, tolerant, diverse, decent country. That is the real Britain. The country I love and will fight for.

Survivors of sexual assault and abuse deserve to tell their stories in their own way, on their own terms, in their own time. They do not need to be managed. Let Them Speak.

Keir Starmer attempted to ward off speculation about his future with a reset speech this morning 💬 What did you make of it? 👍👎 #Peston

Before they run it back... re-live their first meeting 👀 #KeyshawnAlbright2 | MAY 16 | @DAZN

Why does no one in Scotland ever talk about how many children go missing each year? Why is there no register of how many children are being raped every year? Why are so many victims and survivors so terrified to come forward? These are all the things I spoke about on Friday and I broke down because we all know things are going to get a lot worse and no one seems to care. If you look across the UK you can get the answers to all these questions and just yesterday I heard that almost 1000 children have gone missing in Stoke in the last year.. I am terrified the way things are going in Scotland.. Ive Just been invited to spend a week at a Christian retreat in Wales. Just exactly what I need right now. Heading down on Wednesday. Thanks Pastor G for the recommendation.. 🙏

Moment Ian Watkins' 'attacker' says 'have a good sleep' after 'slashing paedo's neck' dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-ne…

STATEMENT FROM DONNA RACHEL EDMUNDS, ADVANCE COUNCILLOR AND FOUNDER OF @Archive4Truth, CALLING ON @benhabib6 TO RELEASE AN EPISODE OF 'FEARLESS' RECENTLY RECORDED BY A CSE SURVIVOR. I confirm that I am currently supporting @Femi_Mohammed1, a survivor of historical child sex trafficking and presently a victim of sexual assault and threats made against her life. On the 29th April 2026 Femi and I travelled to London at the invitation of Ben Habib to take part in his Fearless podcast. I was invited as a former member of Rupert Lowe’s Rape Gang Inquiry panel and as founder of The Survivors, an organisation investigating child sex trafficking in the UK. Our mission is to provide survivors with a voice, agency, dignity and support. Femi was invited to speak about her experiences as a victim of sexual assault by an individual who, at the time, was a Conservative councillor, and as a participant in the Rape Gang Inquiry. Femi had been selected to give evidence at the hearings, only to be silenced without explanation at the last minute. She is also a survivor of child sex trafficking, having been sold and trafficked at the age of 17. Femi is a woman of colour, a demographic that remains woefully underrepresented in media discussions surrounding sexual abuse and exploitation. Femi and I both believed the recording went very well. The following day, however, I received a request from Ben Habib for proof of Femi’s experiences as a victim of sex trafficking over 30 years ago. I found this request astonishing because the offences occurred decades ago, and because I am unaware of any other survivor in the public sphere being asked to provide evidence of their abuse in this manner. Nonetheless, Femi provided official CPS evidence of her attempts to take action against one of her traffickers. This evidence was passed to Ben Habib. Ben Habib then requested that the podcast be re-recorded, and Femi agreed. We recorded a second version in her home on Monday 4th May 2026. During this recording, it became clear that Ben intended to use this for political gain. Ben stated that he intended to release the episode and also promised to send a copy to Kemi Badenoch. Having complied with every request made of her, twice, I felt confident that Femi would finally be heard. On Thursday 7th May, I was contacted by Ben’s personal assistant, who wanted to discuss the podcast. I felt that Femi should be included in that conversation and made it clear that any delays or obstacles in releasing the podcast after it had been recorded twice would constitute institutional abuse against her. Femi had no direct interaction with Ben or his assistant regarding the podcast, aside from attending the post-podcast meal in London, during which Ben complimented her on how articulate and composed she was after everything she had been through. I offered both Ben and his assistant the opportunity to speak directly with Femi, but they did not take up the offer.

 All arrangements for both Femi and myself to participate in the podcast were made directly with Ben Habib, who had consistently indicated that he wanted the podcast to go ahead. I first started working with grooming gang survivors in 2015, as a journalist on Breitbart London. During the last decade I have observed that abuse against survivors takes place in two phases:
 1. The sexual, physical, and emotional abuse inflicted by perpetrators, abuse that the public now increasingly recognises and understands. 2. The institutional abuse that follows, in which survivors are “managed” by systems that fail to care for them. Systems that remove children from their mothers “for their own good”; that label trauma responses as mental health disorders in order to sedate rather than treat; that silence victims on the grounds that they are supposedly too fragile to speak. These are systems that protect perpetrators by treating victims themselves as the problem. In my view, this is the system that was invoked in order to silence Femi. More recently, I have observed what I believe to be a third phase of abuse: 3. Institutions and individuals who publicly position themselves as advocates for survivors, yet ultimately exploit survivors for personal, political, or reputational gain. In my opinion, the Rape Gang Inquiry falls into this category. So, now, does Ben Habib’s 'Fearless'. Femi has requested that the original studio recording from the 27th April 2026 be released in full. I fully support that request. The recording was strong, sincere, and compelling. Femi told her story with dignity and courage, and it is a story that deserves to be heard. Ben, I urge you to do the right thing and release the podcast immediately.

 For Femi's statement on the matter, please see @Femi_Mohammed1

Over the past few days a number of false claims, personal attacks and half-truths have been circulated about me, so I want to explain clearly what actually happened and why I have spoken out. I was invited onto Ben Habib’s podcast, Fearless, to discuss the failures of Rupert Lowe’s Rape Gang Inquiry and the wider issue of institutional failings around grooming gangs. During that process, a survivor named Femi approached me asking for the opportunity to speak publicly after being dropped from the Inquiry hearings without explanation. I took that request seriously. As someone who regularly speaks with survivors, I understand the importance of ensuring people are emotionally capable of speaking publicly and fully understand the consequences of doing so. After lengthy conversations with Femi, I believed she was capable, informed, and very clear that speaking publicly formed part of her healing journey. On 29th April, Femi and I travelled to London and recorded a full studio podcast with Ben Habib. No safeguarding concerns were raised before, during or after recording. In fact, we were praised afterwards and told the episode would be published on 4th May. Days later, that changed. Publication was halted, repeated demands for further evidence were made, and pressure was applied for a second recording despite my explicit concerns that re-recording would be distressing and unnecessary. A second recording was eventually carried out online under far more uncomfortable circumstances. Afterwards, both Femi and I made clear that we did not want that version released and instead requested publication of the original studio recording. That request was refused repeatedly. Having reflected on the messages that have now been made public, I believe the central issue here is not actually about safeguarding at all. It is about control, optics and narrative management. Ben repeatedly stated that his concern was protecting Femi. Yet throughout the exchange, Femi made her wishes explicitly clear: she wanted the original studio recording released. I repeated that position to Ben multiple times. He still refused. If this was truly about protecting Femi, then why was the version she felt comfortable with blocked, while another version, which contained more graphic detail, more names, and potentially greater legal exposure, was considered acceptable? The most revealing part of the exchange is when Ben states: “The second one allowed me properly to prepare and set the scene.” To me, that shifts the issue away from safeguarding and toward presentation, framing and image management. It suggests the concern was not simply whether Femi spoke, but how the story reflected on Ben, the platform and the wider political narrative. That is why I believe what happened here crosses into classic gaslighting and paternalistic control. Femi was repeatedly told decisions were being made “for her protection” while her own clearly expressed wishes and emotional wellbeing were overridden. When we explained that the second recording had caused more distress, that concern was dismissed with "Nonsense." by Ben. When she said being silenced again was what was harming her, the response became that publication itself would somehow harm her. That is not listening to a survivor. That is reinterpreting a survivor’s reality for them. To be absolutely clear: publishers do have legal responsibilities, and editorial concerns can exist. I have never denied that. But if legal exposure was genuinely the overriding concern, then it makes no sense to reject the version with fewer names and less graphic detail while pushing for release of the version containing more. That inconsistency is why so many people can now see that this appears to have been less about safeguarding and more about controlling the optics of the story and ensuring it was presented in a way that showed Ben in the best possible light. What makes this especially disappointing is that all of this happened under the banner of a podcast called 'Fearless', which claims to champion free speech and oppose institutional silencing. A survivor tried to tell her story in her own words. She should have been heard. Instead of engaging honestly with these concerns, certain individuals connected to leadership have chosen to respond with personal abuse, smears and attempts at public humiliation. People are free to disagree with me. That is democracy. But disagreement is not an excuse for intimidation, no-platforming or character assassination against elected representatives who raise legitimate concerns. This should never have become about personalities, factions or political image management. It should have been about allowing a survivor to tell her story in the way she chose. That remains my position.

@Raw_Combat_ @FunkeeStudio Look at the other "doctors",crowding round,just filming for the guys "protection" I suppose🙄🙄🙄

@antmiddleton @Keir_Starmer @FunkeeStudio For what do you achieve ? A tv person a ?

@GBPolitcs @FunkeeStudio

@northernlass_26 @davidkurten @FunkeeStudio The Irish are not British. The British are not Irish. Ireland is not in the British Isles. Will you lot never get over your loss?