G.R. Mead

6.5K posts

G.R. Mead

G.R. Mead

@GRMead3

Trade quod traditum est, et plus. "Hand on what was handed you, and more."

The Southern Coast เข้าร่วม Ocak 2022
438 กำลังติดตาม231 ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
G.R. Mead
G.R. Mead@GRMead3·
Sekigahara in 1600 was the largest gun battle ever fought to that point in world history, 25,000 men with firearms among almost 200,000 total fighting. It was in Japan. Tokugawa became shogun in that battle, and immediately set about wiping out gun technology in Japan, because it was then obvious it would destroy the ruling class.
John Ringo SF Author@Jringo1508

Back in the days of Knights, a mounted knight could kill any number of peasants. Then came gunpowder. The British Government think that by outlawing guns, they've won. They're the Aristos again. But... Then came 'booby traps' and dynamite and car bombs and IEDs and drones and... We really don't need the 2nd Amendment anymore. We've got cars and household chemicals. Ever since gunpowder, you cannot put the serfs back in the fields. Not if they have any access to anything and are fed up with your shit.

English
0
0
2
16
G.R. Mead
G.R. Mead@GRMead3·
No, that's not the reason Galileo was an ass. St. Augustine taught us to read Scripture with the book of nature and not against it. Galileo's heliocentrism could not be empirically proved at the time. Stellar parallax it should show was absent as was noted by Aristarchus and Aristotle. It was not actually shown until the 1840's. His error was not in teaching the system, but demanding it be accepted as a necessary truth -- without the required evidence, which had been known for thousands of years.
Steve Skojec@SteveSkojec

I have heard from Christians who absolutely believe this would mess up their worldview. It has everything to do with how exclusivist their soteriology is. The reason Galileo got in trouble with Rome wasn’t because of a novel scientific theory; it was because he was threatening biblical cosmology, where the Earth was the center of the universe because it’s where God became man and redeemed the human race.

English
0
1
1
11
G.R. Mead
G.R. Mead@GRMead3·
Someone once said: "Logic is not truth." Put another way, logic serves evil premises as well as it serves good. The question is whether the person before you is making an argument for a good or an evil.
G.R. Mead tweet media
The DarkHorse Podcast@thedarkhorsepod

Bret Weinstein cuts straight to the chase: "We are going to have an endless battle in which those of us who see what we believe is clear evidence of some kind of election rigging or fraud are faced with indignation from a vast array of people portraying themselves as more rigorous and careful who say, 'Where is your evidence? Where exactly is your evidence that there was something wrong with this election?' And we are gonna be caught in the following predicament. No piece of evidence is sufficient to establish that case. And the sum total of all of the evidence contains true things and false things. So it is also no good. So the question is, can you logically deduce that something has gone wrong? I believe you can easily. Can you prove it? No. And not being able to prove it means that the election will proceed. It will be validated by all of the structures, including the courts. And that means that those who take on the power that derives from these elections will be the result of whatever process we just went through, whether it was an election that happened to be anomalous through organic means, or it was the result of some kind of fraud or election rigging. That is not an accident. That is not an accident. And the point that I wanna make primarily is the primary evidence against elections that look like this being organic is not actually in the trickle of evidence that we are actually able to see, the moment by moment vote count that does something strange during the night when some large tranche of ballots is suddenly counted or something like that. The evidence is in the structure of how the elections are actually carried out. These elections are designed to allow fraud that cannot be detected and will not be prosecuted. And that's really the thing that we must focus on." @BretWeinstein

English
0
0
0
11
G.R. Mead
G.R. Mead@GRMead3·
Persia is still Persian. But the Achaemenids, the Seleucids, the Sassanians, the Timurids, and the Ottomans aren't around any more. A civilization often survives such things. Its rulers, however, rarely do.
G.R. Mead tweet media
InfantryDort@infantrydort

The Lie of Infinite Tolerance One of the strangest pathologies of the modern West is that we have become obsessed with managing reactions while refusing to confront causes. A “migrant” tries beheading someone in the shire. The community watches in horror. Then public anger arrives and suddenly an entire class of people emerges to lecture everyone about tone, restraint, optics, and behavior. Behavior. ALWAYS behavior. NEVER the conditions that produced it. NEVER the policies that enabled it. NEVER EVER the leaders who ignored it. Just endless sermons directed at the people expected to endure it. History is littered with ruling classes that mistook public anger for the disease when it was merely the damn fever. A fever isn’t supposed to be pleasant. Neither is a warning light on a f*cking dashboard. Or smoke pouring from beneath a door. Only a fool spends his or her time attacking the warning signs while the fire continues to spread. Civilizations survive hard truths. What they rarely survive is a governing or “moral” class so frightened of confrontation that it demands silence from the people while reality tears through the walls around them. Entropy has never cared about anyone’s preferred narrative. Not once. Ever. It arrives all the same. History gives you two options when it comes to entropy: 1. Confront it 2. Die

English
0
0
0
9
G.R. Mead
G.R. Mead@GRMead3·
@moveincircles Dal Riata was and is a thing, much deeper than the petty confessional divides. Scot was only ever the Roman name for Irish.
English
0
0
3
175
Mary Harrington
Mary Harrington@moveincircles·
Who was it the other day insisting that Scots-Irish is not a thing, because JD Vance or whatever? Maybe so from a middle-class southern English POV but I'm not sure what you call riots across Scotland because of a murder in Belfast, if it's not tribal solidarity
Mary Harrington tweet media
English
26
20
358
13.2K
G.R. Mead
G.R. Mead@GRMead3·
Queequeg knew it, and though he had hoped for more from the Christendom he had imagined, he was resigned to it. That's why he had his coffin on board. He carved his meaning, his soul, effectively, into it. His resolution in the face of the deathwork they were engaged in is what saves the only survivor to tell us of that apocalypse.
Kale Zelden@kalezelden

The thought occurred to me that The Pequod is an image of modernity itself. It is at full sail atop the totality of reality. Only Ishmael really knows. Maybe Pip. Everyone else is in the deep throes of cope.

English
0
0
1
32
G.R. Mead
G.R. Mead@GRMead3·
That's certainly what Nathan Bedford Forrest thought looking down off Missionary Ridge after Chickamauga. He tried to persuade Bragg to immediately attack with such artillery support to take the city before the Union regrouped. Indecisive Bragg instead chose merely to siege from those points instead. He basically let Grant use the river defeat him.
Enguerrand VII de Coucy@ingelramdecoucy

Or for cannon emplacement, yeah

English
0
0
0
98
G.R. Mead
G.R. Mead@GRMead3·
@GPT_Neanderthal American rifle squad doctrine is basically: group squad to advance on cover, identify targets, fire on targets, advance to cover, regroup squad to advance, re-identify targets, fire on targets ... (iterate). Play like you fight.
English
1
0
0
34