Grigoris Chrysos

363 posts

Grigoris Chrysos

Grigoris Chrysos

@Grigoris_c

Assistant Professor at @UWMadison. Interested in Reliable ML. https://t.co/Sy3v4o7vHo

Madison เข้าร่วม Aralık 2011
250 กำลังติดตาม641 ผู้ติดตาม
Grigoris Chrysos
Grigoris Chrysos@Grigoris_c·
@pcastr Not unique solution, but if every workshop though is on a mainstream idea (e.g. "generative models"), then famous speakers are more likely. More niche topics can achieve this: we hope our ICML workshop does this with solid/younger researchers #speakers" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">grigoris.ece.wisc.edu/workshops/colo…
English
0
0
2
295
Pablo Samuel Castro
I wish there were a way to increase diversity in workshop keynotes/panelists. There are a few famous researchers who end up being keynotes/panelists on multiple workshops, which means lots of other great researchers are not getting those opportunities.
English
9
12
150
10.8K
Christos Kyrkou
Christos Kyrkou@ChristosKyrkou·
Hey @CVPR I recall that Findings track was going to happen between 5-7 of June in the details section. But in the camera ready it says June 3rd. Can you please clarify the proper date?
English
4
0
1
1.3K
Damien Teney
Damien Teney@DamienTeney·
@icmlconf The options at ICML during the review/discussion phase are very confusing. The only one that seems compatible with a rejection is marked "please select sparingly". Are we expecting that most of the submissions need to be accepted??? Or did I misread something?🤷
Damien Teney tweet media
English
3
0
20
2.2K
Grigoris Chrysos รีทวีตแล้ว
Dimitris Papailiopoulos
Dimitris Papailiopoulos@DimitrisPapail·
The entire NSF research budget is ~$9B/year. This is literally funding every awarded PI at every field and every institution. But we've decided that all of basic science is a rounding error in comparison to venture bets. Please consider funding basic science more.
English
10
51
513
58.1K
Grigoris Chrysos
Grigoris Chrysos@Grigoris_c·
There is always an exciting event happening in SIMONS. Follow Gautam's advice
English
0
0
3
324
Grigoris Chrysos รีทวีตแล้ว
Caglar Gulcehre
Caglar Gulcehre@caglarml·
Coding is only a small fraction of what a CS PhD student actually does; perhaps 10–30% of their time. The real goal of a PhD, and of being a professor, is not to outsource research work but to educate and train the next generation of scientists: people who deeply understand their field, can think critically about it, and ultimately become experts capable of pushing the frontier of knowledge forward. Coding is probably one of the least interesting part of being a CS PhD. We need human experts even more than before at the age of AI.
Sayash Kapoor@sayashk

In the last few months, I've spoken to many CS professors who asked me if we even need CS PhD students anymore. Now that we have coding agents, can't professors work directly with agents? My view is that equipping PhD students with coding agents will allow them to do work that is orders of magnitude more impressive than they otherwise could. And they can be *accountable* for their outcomes in a way agents can't (yet). For example, who checks the agent's outputs are correct? Who is responsible for mistakes or errors?

English
17
37
421
43.5K
Grigoris Chrysos
Grigoris Chrysos@Grigoris_c·
@gavinrbrown1 Do they learn the exact rules though? In logic based networks, you have a first order logic argument that is either true/false, right?
English
1
0
0
16
Gavin Brown
Gavin Brown@gavinrbrown1·
@Grigoris_c But some systems learn logical rules from data, right? Is that so different from RL on math?
English
1
0
0
58
Gavin Brown
Gavin Brown@gavinrbrown1·
Are reasoning LLMs a type of neurosymbolic AI?
English
5
0
8
2.4K
Grigoris Chrysos รีทวีตแล้ว
Dimitris Papailiopoulos
Dimitris Papailiopoulos@DimitrisPapail·
Unburdened by formalism, you remember what research was always meant to be: wonder.
English
4
15
90
5.1K
Grigoris Chrysos รีทวีตแล้ว
Gautam Kamath
Gautam Kamath@thegautamkamath·
Fantastic post by Colin Raffel, "We Are Over-Indexing on Paper Acceptance," drafted in May 2021 (!) but only posted now. The more things change.. Last sentence: "If you want to judge a researcher’s quality, the only meaningful way is to read their papers and judge for yourself."
Gautam Kamath tweet media
English
1
12
124
10K
Grigoris Chrysos
Grigoris Chrysos@Grigoris_c·
Are you applying for jobs? I would seriously consider Kangwook's new adventure below
Kangwook Lee@Kangwook_Lee

Excited to share that I joined KRAFTON (known as the @PUBG company) as the inaugural CAIO 😄 @Krafton_AI (the AI R&D entity at KRAFTON) is already probably the strongest AI R&D entity for AI for gaming worldwide, and one of the best AI R&D entities in Korea. And we are not stopping there. We will continue developing foundation research and applying it to advance AI for gaming: AI for better gaming experiences (stay tuned for PUBG Ally!) and AI for game development. More about KRAFTON AI here: krafton.ai In addition to making KRAFTON AI the best AI x Gaming organization, for longer-term goals, we are committed to conducting world-class R&D in physical AI, leveraging the intersection between the gaming and AI technology we have and physical AI. Toward this goal, we founded a new physical AI company, @LudoRobotics, and I will be the CTO of it. We are just getting started, and I am really excited about what we can build! We are hiring in the Bay Area and Seoul, so if this sounds like your kind of problem, please reach out :-)

English
1
0
6
1.2K
Grigoris Chrysos
Grigoris Chrysos@Grigoris_c·
Technically strong work, but narrowly rejected from the main conference track of @CVPR ? Thanks to CVPR program chairs, we are piloting the Findings Track to present those papers to the community
Humphrey Shi@humphrey_shi

Decisions for @CVPR 2026 are out—congratulations to all authors. I’m excited to share a community step forward: the new CVPR Findings Track. Area Chairs recommended 1717 papers for potential inclusion, creating a principled pathway to recognize and share valuable work that may not be the best fit for the main program—while still enabling authors to publish and present through integrated Findings poster sessions. As our field scales, we need not only better models—but better community infrastructure. This effort is led collectively by the Findings organizing team—Bryan Plummer, Kevin Shih, @anand_bhattad, @jccaicedo, @Grigoris_c, @BoqingGo, @liuziwei7, and me. Huge thanks to the CVPR General Chairs, Program Chairs, and especially the Area Chairs for supporting this step forward. Looking forward to seeing many of you at CVPR 2026—across the main program, Findings, and workshops.

English
0
0
8
1.1K
Kaiyu Yue
Kaiyu Yue@kaiyuyue·
@Grigoris_c @tomgoldsteincs I think so, because we also test a different animal, like panda (not in Animal-Faces), the model can also smooth the stitches. But the model will turn it to cat or tiger with long beard. So if the model is well-trained on massive data, it would be reliable.
English
1
0
1
214
Tom Goldstein
Tom Goldstein@tomgoldsteincs·
⛷️Here’s my entry for the fast generative model olympics🥇 The Sphere Encoder is an autocoder so powerful that it produces high quality images quickly and without diffusion. At training time, we learn an encoder that maps natural images uniformly onto the surface of a sphere. At inference time, we sample a random vector from the sphere, and a decoder makes it into an image.
Tom Goldstein tweet media
English
16
61
501
52.3K