ImperfectTrader

@TraderMathe @ApexTradeFund Hope you will make it, you deserve it buddy.

Another good day on the @ApexTradeFund accounts. Up $83,000 for today, account 6 finally closing in on the $170,000 profit mark.

Make sure to join. If you want to be a better trader, this is a must!

The winners are 🔥 @QueeNabella17 @Traderto30k @_Carlostrader_ @AndriDFM @Tradezone_fx @J_Eagle_Fx @coinbean1 @foakin130274 @syl_fx10345 @Obscure_matter All of you will be DMed directly by @thepipfarm .

💛10 x 20k challenges💛 FALL IN LOVE WITH @thepipfarm CONSISTENCY MODE CHALLENGE How to win 💛Follow @thepipfarm, @jamesglyde, @anaskenderska and @ImTraderFX 💛Join our newsletter go.pipfarm.com/news 💛Like, repost and comment #CONSISTENTLYBETTER

Winners are here! @siyamishraavsi @bekafx_trader @u_emmanuels85 @arie5ta12_ @SI_sM_Vl_OgEr_4 @maulanaICT @ramchandrafxx @franklyn0255 @prachi_fx @bellicose06 Enjoy. I will DM all the winners, if they do not respond within 24 hours. New winners will be chosen. Thanks @QuantTekel !!!

The giveaway ends tonight. Last chance to get in with your friends.

@TraderMathe @thinkcapitalcom Good job buddy!

First payout of the month is in, $5,671.17 refund included. This might be my $100,000 month. Will drop a full 'review' on @thinkcapitalcom soon.

Last chance to join now!

@Gobelin_butpro @Funding_Traders Dm me, please.

Check their Discord and you will see why. Payouts delayed for weeks. They're denying payouts for made up retroactively applied reasons, tell you to trade more in the hopes of you failing the account and if that doesn't work they just make something up. I waited 2 Months on a payout and then got denied because I closed a trade 36min before news! On their website/faq it even said that news trading is completely allowed. They're a incompetent joke and out of funds. Their ceo is a known scammer and the reviews are all artificial. 50% Discount running lol

@BikfxgenesisAi @Funding_Traders Read the post again. Literally mentioned the risk rule 😉 I also failed challenge due to that.

@ImTraderFX @Funding_Traders During promoting them , you have forgotten to show us this . Having this during the evaluation is the worse . That's the reason why you won't see traders going there .

Join now.

50K Giveaway with @QuantTekel 💚💚 If you want a free account, just join now. Winners will be chosen soon. Rules are simple. Follow @ImTraderFX and @QuantTekel Retweet Tag three friends Enjoy💚

@fundingpips sponsoring the @LaLiga

See for yourself which accounts on X criticise firms for introducing consistency and risk rules or interviews. You'll figure out what's going on here. @Jamesglyde has my full support. Not only because he is actively fighting this problem in the industry, but also because he is one of the few who is not afraid to talk about the problems he faces. Take a look at who here at X has fought the hardest against @thepipfarm implementing a consistency program. Quick, before those individuals delete it. :-)

I second that. You're one of the few with any sense. Most influencers here cry that the company only lets them risk 1% of the balance, or that they implemented a consistency rule. These same people will then mock the firms when they face problems and are facing bankruptcy. Most traders and influencers just want the easiest conditions so they can make a few payouts and sell their courses quickly. The reality is that most companies in the industry will sooner or later introduce various risk limits and consistency rules. And why wouldn't they if it allows them to pay out real traders.

I know this will be controversial take. BUT HEY, PLEASE LISTEN TO ME AND READ IT ALL FIRST! Lately, I’ve noticed a growing trend among traders demanding more from prop firms: easier challenges, higher risk allowances, and fewer restrictions. Take a closer look at the statistics—unique traders are down almost 50% from their all-time high. This means fewer new traders are entering the industry. It’s not surprising, but I hope this visual representation helps you grasp the bigger picture. Now, let me ask you this—where do you think the money is coming from? And what happens when more traders, who are unprofitable outside of prop trading, start demanding more for themselves? You guessed it—we’re all screwed. Right now, prop firms operate somewhat like pension systems. As long as there’s a steady "workforce" of traders failing challenges, they can afford to pay out to the profitable traders without worry. But when that workforce shrinks—when the number of failing traders falls below the healthy percentage needed to sustain the profitable ones—that’s when the system starts to break down. Think about how governments manage pensions. When fewer young people contribute to the system, the retirement age goes up. It’s not ideal, but it’s necessary to keep the system afloat. Similarly, when prop firms face an imbalance, they’re forced to introduce limits to protect their business and ensure payouts for their clients. If governments didn’t manage risks this way, there’d be no pensions for the elderly. If prop firms didn’t manage their risks, there’d be no payouts for future clients—and worse, someone could lose money even if they didn’t fail a challenge. Believe me, it’s far better to invest $500, withdraw $5000 twice, and face some limits than to invest $3,000 only to watch the company collapse and get nothing in return. So, next time you feel like complaining online about being banned or limited, take a moment to reflect. Maybe, just maybe, the issue isn’t the firm—it’s that you’re simply not profitable but instead taking advantage of a system. Now, some of you might ask, "Why do prop firms need to manage risk like this?" The answer is simple: they have no other choice. The leverage they give traders is almost unsustainable when hedged in real markets. I mean obviously for a while they could (while company is relatively small) but if a company faces a rapid growth it starts to be impossible to be liquid enough to cover operations. Think about it—you pay $500 and get access to a $100,000 account. That’s $1 million in buying power with even just 1:10 leverage. The reality you have 2000:1 leverage on your money. You’re getting a million-dollar buying power for a small $500 fee, and yet, some traders are still greedy. Instead of managing risk and trying to maintain the account, many demand the ability to risk $5,000 in a single trade. Now, imagine 1,000 traders doing this on an NFP day, with 50% of them catching a 100-pip move. Who’s going to cover the damage to the company if the company is not managing risk pro actively? The whole point of this post is simple: it’s time for us, as traders, to start thinking professionally and, more importantly, take this industry seriously. Look at the bigger picture. Love, DidZW

Winners are here! Hope you won the account and change your trading career! Winners were chosen by @thepipfarm . I would love to publicly thank them for the giveaway! Always here for the community. If you won, contact them, please. @shelsonphilippe @l_bukar7605 @Over_Th1nker @mailsoncn19 @Eastego1 @carlobdejesus @Akirazenonn @Tata2021A @ForexGospel @AraujoGessh

Ending tomorrow! Join now if you want a free account.

We are still going guys, join now. Ending soon.

@dezzifx Do propfirms even have a tool to defend themselves?

CID blocked? No worries. IPs restricted? Not an issue. EAs prohibited? No problem. Your trade can be registered as a manual trade. Some CEOs are being milked dry and don’t even notice. The irony? They think inviting the wolves over for dinner is a genius move.