Intento
648 posts

Intento
@IntentoZone
Purpose-built blockchain for trustless orchestration of your intent. Executed across any chain. Trustless, Seamless & Unstoppable ⛓️🌊

The Future Runs on Intento From trustless orchestration to cross-chain strategies — we’re enabling the next-gen crypto UX. 📅 Roadmap highlights: Advanced On-chain Flows AI-generated flows & Union integration Institutional-grade tools 🌐 Join the journey with $INTO

🚨New smart contract exploit on Ethereum mainnet, from 3 hours ago - this one is for ~37 WBTC, worth over $3.1M Contract was 41 days old with unverified code (closed source) - only non-human readable code published.

🚨A smart contract exploit from 1hr ago just drained ~8536 ETH, worth around ~$26M The code was live on Ethereum for almost 5 years already. Source code unverified - only bytecode is public.


$ATOM as a neutral settlement layer for cross-chain swaps? Vibe-coding to the rescue 👇 🌐atom-intents.com $ATOM Intents (demo) = intent-based trading for @cosmoshub (built on Skip Select). Instead of manually routing through DEXs, you sign what you want: “swap 100 ATOM for ≥145 OSMO” - solvers compete to fill it. How it works * Sign an intent (min output, not route) * Batch auction -> solvers bid * Hub escrow locks funds * Solver delivers output (verified via IBC) * Hub releases escrow to solver * Fail to deliver → refund after timeout What stands out: 🔸 MEV mitigation via batch auctions 🔸 MEV protection via batch auctions 🔸 Works on chains without smart contracts (Celestia, etc.) via IBC Hooks 🔸 Solvers can tap DEXs, direct matching, or off-chain liquidity — whatever gets best price 🔸 Hub = neutral settlement layer for cross-ecosystem trades 🔸Design targets in spec: ~2–5s execution + near CEX pricing (0.1–0.5%) 🔸Partial fills + auction/matching + IBC settlement flows Contributors include @zmanian 👍and @claudeai 👀 If this pattern works, more swaps settle “through the Hub” -> more Hub activity -> more $ATOM-denominated usage. 🫡



