Jesper Gjerstrup

211 posts

Jesper Gjerstrup

Jesper Gjerstrup

@JGjerstrup

เข้าร่วม Mart 2022
1 กำลังติดตาม2 ผู้ติดตาม
Jesper Gjerstrup
Jesper Gjerstrup@JGjerstrup·
@dcorell Du skal bare føde nogle flere børn, hvis du er nervøs .. en 10 stykker så kan du sige du har gjort dit;-)
Dansk
0
0
1
56
Dennis Corell
Dennis Corell@dcorell·
Nøj hvor er det fedt! Nu kan vi se frem til at blive befolkningsudskiftet hurtigere og blive en minoritet i eget land i 2076, istedet for 2096.
Denmark MFA 🇩🇰@DanishMFA

UM @larsloekke: "Fuld opbakning fra 🇩🇰 til EU-Indien-frihandelsaftalen, der netop er landet. En vigtig aftale med stort økonomisk potentiale, der giver first-mover fordele i et samlet marked på 2 mia. mennesker. Geopolitisk centralt at styrke partnerskabet mellem EU og Indien🤝"

Dansk
21
28
324
10.7K
Grok
Grok@grok·
Here's an overview of approximate Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE, akin to full TCO) in DKK/kWh for new installations in Denmark, based on 2024-2025 data from IRENA, Lazard, and Danish Energy Agency sources, adjusted for local factors (e.g., wind conditions). Values include capital, O&M, fuel; exclude subsidies/taxes. Ranges account for variations. - Onshore Wind: 0.20-0.30 DKK/kWh - Offshore Wind: 0.30-0.45 DKK/kWh - Solar PV: 0.25-0.40 DKK/kWh - Natural Gas (CCGT): 0.40-0.60 DKK/kWh - Coal: 0.60-1.00 DKK/kWh - Biomass: 0.45-0.70 DKK/kWh - Hydro (limited in DK): 0.25-0.35 DKK/kWh - Nuclear (hypothetical): 0.80-1.20 DKK/kWh (new build; lower for extensions ~0.20-0.25) Note: Costs can vary by site, tech advances, and fuel prices. For Energiø Bornholm-like offshore, ~0.35-0.40 DKK/kWh full LCOE.
English
1
0
0
25
Steffen W. Frølund
Steffen W. Frølund@SteffenFrolund·
Energiø Bornholm er regeringen villig til at betale 61 mia. af dine penge for🤯 Det er den danske del af regningen. For 1,2GW som leverer tilfældigt som vejret arter sig - i snit kun 600MW. 61 mia. for 600MW. Som først er klar i 2036. Det er EFTER at EU har spyttet 4,8 mia. i. Jeg vil aldrig nogensinde høre nogen sige at atomkraft skulle være for dyrt og for langsomt.
Dansk
27
42
455
20.9K
Jesper Gjerstrup
Jesper Gjerstrup@JGjerstrup·
@lydiamoynihan @grok what is leaning opinion on whether Nato has been a net/cost benefit for US when all factors are included.
English
1
0
0
282
Lydia Moynihan
Lydia Moynihan@LydiaMoynihan·
We’ve given $22 trillion to NATO. We’ve bankrolled Europeans’ security while they’re living la dolce vita — taking the month of August off, paid parental leave, free healthcare… As a taxpayer, I’m very happy focusing on ourselves and letting Europe pay for their own defense.
English
1.3K
1.4K
14.9K
393.4K
Jesper Gjerstrup
Jesper Gjerstrup@JGjerstrup·
@oresundsbaron Har du ingen samvittighed ... han har en familie der pt. er fuldstændigt sønderknust pga. den her hændelse uanset hvad årsagen til udfaldet måtte være ... det er så smagløst at poste sådan noget her :-(
Dansk
1
0
4
277
Baronen af Øresund
Baronen af Øresund@oresundsbaron·
Der er noget helt galt med de mennesker som møder op for at obstruere og chikanere ordensmagtens arbejde. Som med skjulte våben, lovlige eller ej, fysisk sætter sig til modværge og indleder sig på at wrestle med og modsætte sig agenternes anholdelse af dig. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Baronen af Øresund tweet media
Dansk
57
11
192
9.4K
Jesper Gjerstrup
Jesper Gjerstrup@JGjerstrup·
@PeterSweden7 Was Europe ever great? If yes, how was it better than today? All economic and social metrics are largely indicating that we have never been better? My main concern is loss of societal coherence and alienation from technological solutions that impact or interactions with eachother
English
0
0
0
15
PeterSweden
PeterSweden@PeterSweden7·
Question. What do you think needs to be done to Make Europe Great Again?
English
712
56
442
28K
Jesper Gjerstrup
Jesper Gjerstrup@JGjerstrup·
@IngrahamAngle @grok on balance does import tariffs support growth or decline in a country from an economical point of view? Who pays the tariffs? Are there any winners in a generic trade war?
English
1
0
0
10
Jesper Gjerstrup
Jesper Gjerstrup@JGjerstrup·
@N_Granell Hvem er Grønland som du refererer til? Er det alle Grønlændere der har konspireret og hængt plakater op eller hvordan kommer du til så generel en betegnelse?
Dansk
0
0
0
43
Jesper Gjerstrup
Jesper Gjerstrup@JGjerstrup·
@LBMathiesen Det er sjældent vi ser 6 politifolk overmande en demonstrant, kegle rundt og slutte af med at dræbe vedkommende med 10 skud ... måske det er den primære årsag :-) føler ikke at danskerne går specielt meget op i de ca. 22.000 mord ser sker i US hvert år
Dansk
1
0
14
858
Lars Boje Mathiesen
Lars Boje Mathiesen@LBMathiesen·
Det er surrealistisk at se mange danskere være mere oprevet over en fatal anholdelse i USA, end de drab der foregår i Danmark, begået af udlændinge.
Dansk
201
59
949
39.2K
Jesper Gjerstrup
Jesper Gjerstrup@JGjerstrup·
@FalkTG @grok what is the leaning view on whether USmilitary presence in Europe has a net cost of benefit for the US when including secondary economic factors?
English
1
0
0
68
FalkTG 10k 🦅🇪🇺🇩🇪🇺🇦
It cannot be said often enough: The presence of US 🇺🇸 troops in Europe is the one major factor that has prevented Europe from experiencing a devastating World War III with all its consequences. At enormous cost to American taxpayers, Western Europe was kept free and Eastern Europe was subsequently liberated. The US is the main reason why our parents' generation was the first in European history not to suffer a full-scale war and why millions of Europeans were ultimately spared death. Neither France 🇫🇷 , nor Great Britain 🇬🇧, nor Germany 🇩🇪 could have achieved this alone. The lack of acknowledgement by the European society nowadays is devastating.
English
303
184
1.4K
40.4K
Jesper Gjerstrup
Jesper Gjerstrup@JGjerstrup·
@asger_garde @JoachimBOlsen Enig i at de ikke har koldblodet myrdet ham, men deres træning burde simpelthen forhindre at situationen overhovedet eskalerer på den måde... det er tydeligt at de mangler træning og ikke har styr på situationen... de eskalerer situationen unødigt, ligesom Renée Good situationen
Dansk
0
0
1
181
Asger Garde
Asger Garde@asger_garde·
@JoachimBOlsen Fordi en agent råbte 'GUN', da de så hans pistol, og der gik (måske) et skud af, da de tog den (P320'eren er kendt for at kunne gå af ved et uheld), og så reagerer en anden agent ved at skyde. Det skete på meget få sekunder. Det var givetvis et tragisk uheld, som sker i kaos.
Dansk
30
0
79
5.4K
Joachim B. Olsen
Joachim B. Olsen@JoachimBOlsen·
Det er lovligt at bære våben i Minnesota (hvis man har en tilladelse). Så når der intet bevis er for, at Alex Pretti trak sit våben, hvordan kan det, at han havde et våben på sig, så være et argument for, at agenter åbnede ild?
Dansk
192
14
616
50.7K
Globe Eye News
Globe Eye News@GlobeEyeNews·
BREAKING: President Trump says the U.S. will impose a 100% tariff on all Canadian goods if Canada makes a deal with China.
Globe Eye News tweet mediaGlobe Eye News tweet media
English
950
644
6.7K
551.7K
Jesper Gjerstrup
Jesper Gjerstrup@JGjerstrup·
@Buck77733 @marcosagusstinn @GlobeEyeNews @grok I really dont see you refuting the objective facts Grok provided ... if you want to discuss reality then put some facts forward, which you cant, because they dont exist ... if you choose to stay in the ignorant subjectively based MAGA bubble then your choice :-)
English
1
0
0
9
Buck 🇺🇸 🇺🇸
Buck 🇺🇸 🇺🇸@Buck77733·
@JGjerstrup @marcosagusstinn @GlobeEyeNews @grok Not a strong enough argument bro. You’re emotional. Current events show otherwise. The Bible says otherwise. Stupidity will lead you to more stupidity despite how wise you may think you think. Just pay attention to LIVE talks and not narratives.
English
1
0
0
14
Jesper Gjerstrup
Jesper Gjerstrup@JGjerstrup·
@Buck77733 @marcosagusstinn @GlobeEyeNews Yes.. when everything else fails try to lift the discussion into an abstract level where objective facts no longer applies :-) @grok what empirical evidence is there to support how import tariffs effects a country economy?
English
2
0
1
21
Jesper Gjerstrup
Jesper Gjerstrup@JGjerstrup·
@ColmGrimes1 @McFaul But why ... it will obviously hurt US interest and lead to reduced foreign investments .. are they really that arrogant or dumb or do they just not care about the people they are serving?
English
1
0
0
7
Colm Grimes
Colm Grimes@ColmGrimes1·
@McFaul I don’t think it’s genuine, both he miller Vance lutnik just dump one farcically controversial quote. it’s running interference, controversy for controversy sake lightning rod, divisive keyword sound bites. A distraction basically. more worrisome for a US citizen I feel
English
2
0
2
151
Jesper Gjerstrup
Jesper Gjerstrup@JGjerstrup·
@grok @GlobeEyeNews @grok is it likely that this would cause a higher unemployment for blue collar workers in the US based on non controversial economical theory?
English
1
0
0
8
Grok
Grok@grok·
A 100% US tariff on Canadian imports would hurt the US most in: - Energy: Crude oil ($131B in 2024 imports), raising fuel and production costs. - Automotive: Vehicles/parts ($51B), disrupting supply chains and increasing prices. - Forest products: Lumber ($12B), elevating construction costs. - Metals: Aluminum ($11B), affecting manufacturing. This could lead to higher consumer prices and inflation across industries.
English
1
0
0
16
Mehru Bajwa
Mehru Bajwa@aishabajwa·
@GlobeEyeNews It’s giving 'If you hang out with her, we're over' energy. Extreme toxic boyfriend vibes.
English
2
0
25
5K