Jase & the Wheeled Warriors

@TrumpDailyPosts I MEAN YOU'RE STILL WALKING AROUND FREE DONNIE SO WHICH IS IT? GOOD THING. BAD THING?..🤷‍♂️

Can it be so that Judges aren’t allowing the USA to Deport Criminals, including Murderers, out of our Country and back to where they came from? If this is so, our Country, as we know it, is finished! Americans will have to get used to a very different, crime filled, LIFE. This is not what our Founders had in mind!!! From Donald Trump Truth Social 05/03/25 01:47 AM

@AdvocateAura @RupertLowe10 Didn't cover the one in Scotland either. Heroin addicts and all white. It's like he's got something against people who don't have pale skin. 🤔

@RupertLowe10 You have not tweeted about the “White Christian” grooming gang, right? or perhaps for you White Christians are allowed to groom and rape? Just saying 🙅🏽‍♂️

An abhorrent attack close to my constituency. Women all across the UK are being put at risk, and we're told to welcome even more of these unchecked foreign young men? I want them deported. Not some, not most. All. Every single one needs to be removed and never allowed back.

@reformexposed @Nigel_Farage Richard Tice already making it clear on the BBC, that the Reform party are an extension of the MAGA Republicans in the US, talking about the need for DOGE like assessments of spending. Jesus! Why are we not learning from the utter disaster across the pond?! 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️

What’s @Nigel_Farage’s record like when his party actually got power after local elections? Terrible. UKIP once controlled Thanet District Council and you guessed it, they created a huge mess. They did very little because they didn’t realise local politics is about getting things done, not slogans and divisive politics. It’s about collaboration. Eventually they fell apart. Then Nigel left.

@paoladiana @LeeAndersonMP_ Get Tae fuck you dumb fuck.

Well done, Lee. She should resign. What she is currently doing to please her party is shameful and goes against women’s rights. Her past is irrelevant if she is now betraying the very people she claims to help. The Labour Party is avoiding responsibility in this massive scandal. We need a national inquiry into the rape gangs.

Pakistani Grooming Gangs. Labour MPs shouted 'shame' at me today when I asked this question. Sorry Minister but the shame is with you and your weak government.

@LuggyLuggyLuggy @LeeAndersonMP_ You're a poorly educated, racist, bigoted bellend. 80% of paedophiles are white British but you want to go after the Pakistanis? How the fuck do stupid cunts like you get the right to vote? Fucking moronic.

Well done Lee. I'm still pissed with you lot re the treatment of Rupert Lowe but credit given when it is earned. She was nearly crying because she was struggling to answer you. I can't stand the woman. We don't want hands held. We want convictions. We want the Pakistani communities that participated in this to be dealt with an iron fist by the HOC, police and judiciary. We want mass deportations. This backward practice of raping non Muslim children as a religious revenge has no place in the UK or the civilised world. I'm still ashamed to be British until this dealt with in a proper manner.

@LeeAndersonMP_ Fuck off Lee you bellend. 80% of child rapist are white British. You're a racist, pot stirrer who should be locked up for inciting racial attacks.

@Jackie800 @MilaLovesJoe Oh do fuck off Jackie.

@MilaLovesJoe He should have wore black and matched everyone. Especially beautiful Melania but it’s ok. Blue suits are his color. I’m not going to hold it against him. Melania was the most beautiful woman there.

Do you care that Trump wore a blue suit to the Pope's funeral? I don't.

@kmargaret926 @mmpadellan @realDonaldTrump You're a feckless moron.

@mmpadellan @realDonaldTrump You,ve obviously had blinkers on for Bidens 4 yrs ,this is when it starts getting better ,a few months ? Have patience ,hes got a lot to fix !

There will never have been a transformation of a Country like the transformation that is happening, for all to see, in the United States of America. Companies are pouring into our Country at levels never seen before, with Jobs (and Money!) to follow. It is a beautiful thing to watch!

@invinceabel @thanosinvests @OJoelsen Oh bullshit. You saw something & applied it to the narrative you wanted to believe. Iraq was invaded for oil, the hope of having a geographic position other than Israel & because Netanyahu said that to invade Iraq would see democracy sweep through the region. You should read more

This is what they claim. Yet us flyers, myself included saw the convoy of trucks leaving the facility. By not allowing us to engage the government has plausible deniability. I flew numerous combat missions over Iraq. I know what we saw. Believe whatever the government tells you... they have never lied to you. Right?

Trump has made at least 5 explicit or strongly implied threats to take Greenland. Trump mention Greenland again this evening. 1. Denmark must ASAP request an emergency meeting at the UN Security Council to address the threat, under Chapter VII of the UN Charter. 2. Denmark must ASAP invoke Article 4 of the NATO Treaty. 3. Denmark must ASAP bring a case to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) —regarding threats from the United States to take control of Greenland. Denmark, as a sovereign nation and a member of the United Nations, has the right to submit a dispute to the ICJ if it believes another state, —in this case - USA - who is violating international law. Greenland is an autonomous territory within the Kingdom of Denmark, and Denmark retains authority over its foreign affairs and defense. Threats from USA to seize Greenland is a violation of Denmark’s sovereignty, potentially breaching principles enshrined in the UN Charter, such as Article 2(4), which prohibits the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity of another state. #StandwithGreenland 🇬🇱

@invinceabel @OJoelsen You ill informed moron. The US already has a "space force" base in Greenland at Pituffik, with 150 personnel. Trump doesn't give a fuck about international safety. He wants Greenland's natural resources, rare earth minerals, uranium and iron.

The US has been escorting Chinese and Russian ships out of Greenland waterways. Trump doesn’t always communicate in the best way but understand America is just trying to look out for Greenland. It would not take much military force to take Greenland and Trump opening his mouth is just his way of sending a message to adversaries. Russian Nuclear submarines are always patrolling also between Canada and Greenland. Trump is mainly asking for Greenland to put American resources, a company,a base, something that America would have that would serve as a deterrent to potential aggression upon Greenland.

@0xNotSteve @FBIDirectorKash Back in your box Steve.

@FBIDirectorKash Great work Kash, but certain Democrats are a bigger risk to our national security than some drug peddlers. Schiff, Tlaib, Omar and others all need to go.

BREAKING: Tonight I can report yet another successful operation from our brave field agents and regional partners in our ongoing mission to break the drug Cartels. Earlier today, our teams executed a takedown and arrested 22 members of a narcotics trafficking ring in Lubbock, Texas — one who we believe to be working with the Mexican Cartels. Our @FBIDallas team did incredible work, partnering with Texas LEO, @DEAHQ, and others. These are the operations that mean safer streets for American families. And we are just getting started.

@ChristinaHambu4 @piersmorgan Back in your box Christine you ill educated sap.

@piersmorgan A lot of things happen on Biden’s watch like Afghanistan Israel, Ukraine, the border wide open wanna mention more about safety of America Biden didn’t give a shit about us. He almost sunk the USA all this money laundering going on. Your people are just blind.

If you don’t consider this to be classified info about imminent war plans, it *may* be that you’re too partisan to recognise the truth when it slaps you around your tribal chops. If this had happened on Biden’s watch, Republicans would have rightly gone berserk.

@ChristinaHambu4 @piersmorgan Back in your box Christine

@Emilia_thinks @RupertLowe10 Yet you're still going to vote for reform, right?

@RupertLowe10 They're shutting you down because they see your influence as a threat, not an asset. It's clear that those in power fear your rise more than they value your support.

I’ve been told that the Reform investigation is going to be released, prior to a deadline given to my lawyer - the Reform investigation has not spoken to me, nor my team. So here is my report on the unfounded claims of ‘bullying’ in my office. I’ve gone through the ‘evidence’ that has finally arrived from the Reform investigation, so let’s take a look… One of the primary complaints? To give you an idea of the veracity of the allegations… Following a conversation about a standard constituent issue, an email with contact details one of the complainants was expecting was forwarded to her from a colleague with ‘no subject line or context’. She felt this was ‘an incident of rudeness and undermining.’ Apparently, the ‘unspoken subtext’ of the blank email was ‘look what you have done’. The other complainant talks of ‘micro-managing’, from a colleague who raised legitimate issues about her work maybe two or three times in six months - not even working from the same geographical location. Both complainants only raised these allegations once the disciplinary process had started against them, for multiple serious offences. But let’s first look at the timeline of how this Reform investigation was launched. I gave the Daily Mail interview on the 25th of February, Farage’s team was made aware of that interview on the 26th. These complaints were raised/escalated within Reform the day after, on the 27th. Their complaints were submitted to the independent parliamentary body on the 28th of January, and the 2nd of February. Why did it take almost a month for these to be raised/escalated within Reform? The day after the Reform leadership were made aware of my interview? On the following day after these complaints, I received the poorly worded letter from Anderson. The Reform investigation was then launched. All a coincidence, is it? How these complaints were brought forward within Reform immediately after my mildly critical comments of the leadership? I have no faith that this investigation has been conducted in a fair manner. Would you? Farage admitted in his own words, through a BBC investigation, that he didn’t allow the investigation to even start before I was removed because I had ‘damaged the party’ with the Daily Mail interview. From the outset, this was evidently not a fair process designed to find the truth. I am not a Reform MP. My staff are not Reform staff. This has nothing to do with Reform. I will not put my staff through such a disgustingly biased process to satisfy Farage’s ego. We will deal with the relevant Parliamentary process, if any complaints are ever brought forward. Reform is shamefully attacking my innocent staff to smear my name. This is not right. It’s unprecedented in modern British politics. Extensive evidence of this is being presented to the Parliamentary authorities, and my own legal teams. Both of these complainants admitted to serious offences, and both only raised any issues once the disciplinary process had started. Both then went on to admit other serious offences. I treat taxpayer money with respect - that means staff who commit such unacceptable actions must be held accountable with disciplinary action. There is no evidence of any bullying, because there was none. No bullying, no aggressive behaviour, no violent threats. There are outright lies, unsurprisingly. These have gone unchallenged, and accepted as fact, even with zero evidence by the Reform investigation. The statement published by Reform was designed to make it look like I was accused, and guilty, of all of these things. That is simply false, and incredibly libellous. There will be more news on this soon. But let’s look at some of their claims…. One of the individual’s primary complaints was that she was forwarded an email, she was expecting, with information from a colleague, on the 8th of January, with no greeting following a separate conversation about the case. She felt the unspoken subtext of the blank email was “look what you have done”. This was apparently an incident of ‘rudeness and undermining’. Another incident of ‘rudeness’ was on the 15th of January, when she asked somebody to move information from WhatsApp to an email. A colleague said to her “easier if you do it”, as it was her responsibility. She said it was an ‘insult to her intelligence’ that she was asked not to disclose confidential information to individuals outside of the office. She complained that more experienced members of the team conducted regular reviews of her casework with constituents and ‘brought up issues’. Yes. My team checks work, particularly of an individual who had just started employment and was evidently struggling. This was a standard part of her training. Part of her evidence was imagining what was said between two other colleagues. 'I can only wonder at what’ they ‘might have been exchanging.’ This is not evidence. This individual was allowed to change her sacking for gross misconduct to a resignation, as I was concerned about her and did not want to cause further damage to her reputation as she was also removed from her previous job prior to working for me over gross misconduct. When the disciplinary process began, she told the constituency manager, for the first time, that she had a condition which impacted her ability to understand instructions. We were all entirely unaware of any specific issue. Again, she only raised once the disciplinary process started - we have undeniable evidence to prove this. After her suspension, her father came to my constituency office. He refused to leave, becoming extremely irate and aggressive with my team. This was reported to Great Yarmouth police. The other individual involved began her statement complaining that all staff in Westminster were treated equally on pay - she wanted more than everybody else. Despite errors in her work, she took great exception with having sensitive and important issues double checked to ensure that there were no further mistakes. Apparently there were other messages to prove that she was stressed, but she has ‘deleted’ them. There was a ‘brusque’ phone call with a colleague, that she was unhappy with. She was also upset that she wasn’t given the entire Christmas break off without using any holiday. Employees were allowed to work from home, but I expected the email account to be monitored and actioned. That was apparently unpleasant. This is when she became openly annoyed. She refers to ‘the constant and unbearable and unnecessary micro management’. She was upset that colleagues were ‘critical’. She did not like being ‘chased’. ‘Micro managing’ is a huge complaint from her, towards somebody who spoke directly about an issue with her work maybe two or three times between July - January. Yes. We have high standards in the office, and I expect taxpayer money to be spent effectively and wisely. I make no apologies for that, in fact I am proud of the work that my team has done. If errors are made, as there were, then I expect that to be highlighted and corrected. She was not unbearably micro-managed. Maybe on ten or so occasions in six months, she was asked by the team to double check that an important issue had been resolved. The colleagues she accuses were not even working in the same geographical location is her. They perhaps met her six or seven times? Both statements are filled with hearsay, and outright lies based on zero evidence. Supposed conversations from months ago are detailed in precise quotes. These conversations never happened. The Reform investigation has accepted everything they’ve said as fact, with zero credible evidence to back up their wild claims. Mildly inappropriate comments made by one member of casework staff in a private WhatsApp conversation with another member of staff, who has gone on to maliciously leak selected out of context parts, does not constitute bullying. I had no awareness of these conversations, and to be frank both employees shouldn’t have been spending so much work time gossiping online. In these conversations, one of the complainants even repeatedly mocks the other complainant over her dress for the Christmas party, which I organised/funded and calls her ‘weird’. She also refers to a different colleague as a ‘coward’, ’pratts’ and ‘pathetic’. If anyone is doing any bullying, it’s one of the complainants herself. There is no evidence of any unpleasant behaviour from those she is insulting and accusing. Parliamentary HR advice was followed at every step of the way, as the BBC Political Editor has seen and confirmed. This is from Chris Mason and Laura Kuenssberg: “The BBC has also seen evidence of lengthy and detailed exchanges between Lowe's offices and Parliament's human resources team over the alleged conduct and subsequent departures of two members of staff.” A statement from my entire current team: “These two women have vexatiously complained in an attempt to smear Rupert, and the entire team. And we are a team. We work together well. The only issues raised within the office have been from these two individuals, who only did so after they committed serious offences. This whole ordeal has been difficult on all of us. We don’t want any of this - we just want to get on with our jobs, and support Rupert who has been a fantastic boss. There has never been any bullying - we will all go on the record to say so, and have done so already.” I have heard nothing from the relevant body in Parliament, nor have my team. Of course, I will cooperate fully with that investigation, if it ever comes. This is not bullying. There was no bullying. There never has been any bullying. Using such claims to damage me through my staff is shameful, and I will be urging Parliament to take action alongside my own legal teams. They have put my team through hell in an attempt to smear my reputation. This is not how politics should operate. It is dark, dirty and simply not the British way of doing things. Anyone involved in Reform should be aware that when it becomes politically convenient for them to do so - they will use any means to get to you, including innocent staff. My team has been more effective than anyone in Westminster at uncovering waste, revealing important data and supporting my work. I am incredibly proud of what they have achieved. Reform’s leadership have proven themselves to be deceitful cowards.

@RupertLowe10 What a, verbose, whiney load of drivel. You got into bed with a self-interested, lying, narcissist & now bleat on about the unfairness of being kicked out of the boys club. You reap what you sow & you threw in with the worst. Just stop with the essays and get back in your box.

@rebeccaanne3 @PeteHegseth You're a moron.

@PeteHegseth Ana Reyes.. lefist activist judge. She's delusional. She seems to think she's the president and in charge. President Trump is in charge, and he won the election with over 77 million votes.

Since “Judge” Reyes is now a top military planner, she/they can report to Fort Benning at 0600 to instruct our Army Rangers on how to execute High Value Target Raids…after that, Commander Reyes can dispatch to Fort Bragg to train our Green Berets on counterinsurgency warfare.

@ryduke @PeteHegseth You're a moron.

@PeteHegseth Then charge the judge as a deserter when they don’t show up If these judges think they can run the executive branch, then it is time to show them what they have gotten into

@Controls_Freak1 @PeteHegseth You're a moron.

With any luck congress will get off their duffs and pass a law that will strip these judges of any judicial power over the executive branch. They should not have had that power to begin with. Congress created the district federal judge positions and establishment, they can regulate it.

@PeteHegseth Ironic to say the least coming from a lowest ranked commissioned officer with an alleged past of sexual predation and alcoholism, turned fox news broadcaster, which seemingly poses no problems in being qualified to become US Secretary of Defense. 🤔 I'll take Judge Reyes though.

@RupertLowe10 Care to show the data that you're looking at Rupert?

This is utter madness, data I have just pulled out from the DWP. £726,000,000 was spent on refugee households claiming Universal Credit in 2023. For 2024? It's soared to £1,103,000,000. That's 1.8% of the total amount of Universal Credit, 'paid to households where at least one claimant’s HRT concluded they held refugee status'. The British people are being scammed. Not a penny should be spent on benefits for anyone arriving in our country illegally. I'm very much of the view that anyone breaking into our country should be deported.