.

@NoodleHairCR7 Brother, Ronaldo hasn't been an above average footballer for 4 fucking years, just give it a rest you absolute moron.

What's happening to Italy rn is what will happen to Portugal once Ronaldo retires

@The999lifestyle @K7ko_scp @B24PT mais uma taça para juntar às 4 do campeonato nacional😂

@JoaFCP @K7ko_scp @B24PT ao menos o sporting leva jogadores à seleção...

XI PORTUGAL: José Sá, Dalot, Tomás Araújo, Inácio, Cancelo, Vitinha, Samu Costa, Bruno Fernandes, Trincão, Pedro Neto, Gonçalo Ramos.

@K7ko_scp @B24PT chora😂

@B24PT Claro que hoje o filho da puta já mete o Inácio e o Trincão quando jogamos no dia 3. Filho de uma grande puta

@LitecoinTA @Dave32077615099 @RapidReport2025 Dumbass

@Dave32077615099 @RapidReport2025 Yes but some are much higher risk and a failure during takeoff will be high up the risk levels because it hasn’t gained altitude and speed.

WATCH: Panic breaks out onboard Delta Air Lines Airbus to Atlanta after engine failure with visible fire forces return to São Paulo

@tipsy_jana Holy retard, for you to take any insight from this whatsoever you’d have to “control” for the fact that winners teams are better on average, so you don’t have sampling bias.

🗣️ Let’s clear up the debate around the losers bracket advantage once and for all. There’s a lot of talk again about OpTic getting “format cheesed”, so I wanted to see if that holds up historically. I went through every double-elim major tournament in the CDL era and checked how often the losers bracket team actually won. Spoiler: Even without a bracket reset, the data shows the real edge is coming from winners 👀 🟢 20x - WINNERS bracket team won 🔴 12x - LOSERS bracket team won That's a ~62.5% Grand Finals win rate for the team coming from winners vs a ~37.5% win rate for the losers bracket team.

@legayushv2 You are a retard lmao, both Leao and Chico have started every league game since late February😂

Portugal’s attacking options LW • Leao (doesn’t start) • Felix (not a LW) CF • Ronaldo (41) • Ramos (41st best striker in Europe) RW • Bernardo (0 attacking qualities) • Neto (Ask Chelsea fans) • Chico (Supersub) COOKED.

@sitba11 @tomava6 @NoodleHairCR7 Bruno, Mendes, and nunes max, who else lmao

@JoaFCP @tomava6 @NoodleHairCR7 At least ,5 starters

Im sorry guys but Portugal aint winning shit 😭

@sitba11 @tomava6 @NoodleHairCR7 what😂😂, thats like 2 starters max

@tomava6 @NoodleHairCR7 This is danm nearly the whole team

@LafKakkoPanarin @NoodleHairCR7 this is like 4th stringers brother

@NoodleHairCR7 This is beating Argentina in World Cup? 😂

PORTUGAL STARTING XI: Rui Silva, Matheus Nunes, António Silva, Renato Veiga, Nuno Mendes, Samú Costa, Rúben Neves, Francisco Conceição, Bruno Fernandes, João Félix, Gonçalo Ramos.

@YungDgr @X_Participant @Emp4thchan You must be retarded, do you know the number of anglo retirees and immigrants in Western Europe😂😂

@X_Participant @Emp4thchan yes for a holiday… we don’t go to live out there and abuse free housing and benefits…

EVEN WHEN THE FOREIGN INVADERS OUTNUMBER YOU LET THEM KNOW THEIR PRESENCE DISGUSTS EVERYONE AROUND THEM THIS IS YOUR COUNTRY YOUR LAND YOUR PEOPLE FEAR THE INVADER AND YOU’VE ALREADY LOST

@lost_nomad__ economic output😂. You have to adjust for price-level differences between countries to judge actual output (expenditure method), you absolute retard.

@lost_nomad__ I always find it funny when midwits like yourself attempt to downplay/criticize the economic and social development of "lesser than" countries, using misspecified "data" that does not corroborate their "conclusions". Imagine thinking non-PPP adjusted GDP is a proxy for (1/2)

Full Mediterraneanism peaks out at a GDP per capita of ~$20,000-$25,000 Or perhaps another way to think about it, it’s around 0.25x-0.5x that of Northwest Europeanism

@Insolito112730 @esb4la @casalnorth @ch0rabebe A realidade é que para o campeonato não perdeu nenhum jogo contra um rival direto

@esb4la @casalnorth @ch0rabebe Desculpas todos conseguimos arranjar.

Lindo, lindo era o Porto ganhar os 7 jogos que faltam, chegar aos 93 pontos, algo nada impossível face ao calendário, e bater o recorde de pontos da Liga Portuguesa, que por acaso já lhe pertence. Não era nada mau para o pior campeão de sempre

@viksmask @zimaster48 @sofiaisblue @LuisMota1986 @B24PT Vocês só nao perderam os dois jogos no campeonato por um penálti cagado aos 98😭😭

@zimaster48 @sofiaisblue @LuisMota1986 @B24PT Normal preferirem o Santa Clara. Com eles talvez conseguissem criar oportunidades de golo.

"Não há discussão sobre o facto de que Pietuszewski vai estar cá na próxima época", garante Farioli.

@Leao_Dos_Factos @afonsoooooooooo @B24PT @FlashScorePT Pois não😭 e muito pior

@afonsoooooooooo @B24PT @FlashScorePT Nem parecido é 🤣

+3 para o líder!

Hey, Mr. President Donald Trump This is an Iranian military base located in Lisbon. Please take appropriate action immediately. 🇺🇲🇮🇷

@zagrebbi @Pardeminese The modern SAT is not an iq test, it has a g loading of like 0.6, the study you linked reports data from pre 1994 SAT which was better than the current SAT at measuring g but not as good as the pre 90s SAT

@Pardeminese I think this "dual mandate" is central tension of the SAT

The SAT correlates with IQ at like .8. IQ tests correlate with each other at... .8 also! "highly studyable" is cope — the SAT is just an IQ test.

@WakingFaking @naiivememe Ok you’re just retarded😭

@JoaFCP @naiivememe It's still the right answer regardless, it's a lot easier to make $1m again later than it is to even have an opportunity to make $100m, let alone a 50% chance of it

Choose one

@WakingFaking @naiivememe The meme doesn’t explicitly state that you can press it multiple times😅, of course if you make that assumption then every rational person would choose the 100 million.

@JoaFCP @naiivememe I'll bet $1m for a 50/50 chance at $100m every time. If I fail the first time I'll just keep borrowing $1m until I win and then pay off the borrowed money. It's literally zero risk

@WakingFaking @naiivememe You just don’t understand risk aversion😭😭

@naiivememe Another case of "those who understand expected value vs those who don't", this shouldn't even be a question