landscape

3.3K posts

landscape banner
landscape

landscape

@Kinddragon3

เข้าร่วม Kasım 2021
110 กำลังติดตาม79 ผู้ติดตาม
landscape
landscape@Kinddragon3·
@bunnykoujou 在中国人看来,一个国家的社会形态和政治制度并不重要,那终究是那个国家自己的事。不会去刻意敌视那些在社会形态和政治制度上和自己国家不一样的国家,而是会视之为世界的多样性。当然,中日关系因为历史原因有它的复杂性。只要西方在东亚的影响力还在,中日韩三国就很难真正达成友好关系,近期无解
中文
0
0
0
18
マネージャー森
マネージャー森@bunnykoujou·
中国には少数民族がたくさん住んでいるし、中国人は個人主義で他人のことを気にしない。 しかし日本にはほとんど少数民族がおらす、2000年頃までは外国人を見たことがなかった。 日本人はマナーやルールにうるさく、お辞儀の角度まで決められている。マナーやルールを守らない外国人に嫌悪感を持つ。
勒石燕然@zizhuj22740

然而,讨厌中国人的日本人显然要比讨厌日本人的中国人要多得多。 友善的中国人要比友善的日本人也要多得多。 随便看一下 X 就知道了。 关于中国的负面新闻,哪怕是极小的一件事,也会在 X 上面获得日本人数万的点赞,以及数百万的浏览量。 我随便举例即可。 中国人在日本偷电。 中国人在日本奈良踢鹿。 中国人在日本的富士山前便利店跳舞。 中国在日本繁华的马路中间拍照。 中国再度开放日本旅游,日本网民纷纷乞求,不要开放。 以上内容都是这一两年来发生的事,而且都是极小的事情。 然而他们在 X 上获得了日本人数百万甚至千万级别的浏览量。 尤其是中国开放日本旅游这一条,非常可笑。就在当天,独卖新闻报道,美国要求日本承担 42 亿日元重建中的 24 亿。 这一条新闻只有可怜的 40 万不到的浏览量。 远远低于每日新闻报道的中国旅游公司再度开放赴日旅游。 可笑吧?明明是关于日本切身利益的新闻,却远不如仇恨中国的新闻热度来得高。 但是在中国,你是否有见过中国人针对日本的细小事件的仇恨? 中国人确实会讨厌日本人,但那都是阶段性且由官方主导的。 即官方发布一项针对日本的政策、针对日本的大新闻,这个时候人们才会关注日本,才会表达对日本的仇恨。 你可以随便去抖音或者微博这些中国的主流社交平台上面搜一搜,看一下,在这些中国的主流平台上面是否有数百万的浏览量,是针对日本人的仇恨的。 我可以说,除非是官方主导的,例如说,前不久针对日本的军民两用名单禁运。 只有在这种大事上,中国人才会关注到日本。 在平时,我们的眼中是没有日本的。 我们的新闻是出现的外国最多的是美国,而不是日本。我们根本不关注日本的细小事,更不必说因此而产生仇恨了。 但是日本是不一样的。日本,我甚至可以说,60% 甚至 80% 以上的日本人,包括平民是仇恨中国人的。 但中国人不是这样的。中国人绝大多数压根不关心日本。 我是用数据来说话的,这个数据你可以在 X 上面搜一搜。而且针对日本人仇恨中国人的 X 发帖。每一个我都有保存。我都有截图。 我是有证据的。 我之所以截图保存这些日本人仇恨中国人的发言,就是为了避免有些人说,啊,仇恨中国的是少数人,啊,他们不过是网右。 说实话,能够高票选出高市早苗的日本人,可以说绝大多数人都是极右翼。 所谓的理智的日本人,不过是极少数。

日本語
3
0
1
639
landscape
landscape@Kinddragon3·
@bunnykoujou 我觉的这很大一部分原因是受西方意识形态宣传和价值宣传,并在世界各地滋生了仇恨。而世界上很多国家包括日本的媒体舆论也都跟着西方走的,而西方掌握话语权。所以一些日本人对中国的敌视和韩国网右,还有西方一些国家的人是同一个逻辑。
中文
0
0
0
14
landscape
landscape@Kinddragon3·
@D931931 不即使想让中国停止产业升级吗?说得那么冠冕堂皇。没有产业升级,一切都是白搭!
中文
0
0
0
7
Jielin Dong 董洁林
China desires all bilateral and multilateral relationships to be defined by its own 'sovereignty,' leaving the other parties with no say in the matter—this is the very essence of the traditional Chinese tribute system.
Michael Pettis@michaelxpettis

Global Times on a new "Plaza Accord": "China will not accept using exchange rates as a pretext for oppression, nor will it return to the old era of great powers coordinating the fate of a few countries." This is a rather bizarre argument to make, although it is one you often hear in the Chinese press. It assumes that the RMB exchange rate belongs to China, and that for the EU or anyone else to intervene in the RMB exchange rate is an act of colonial oppression. But this simply isn't true. An exchange rate "belongs" to both countries involved. If China has intervened to devalue the RMB by 20-30% against the currency of its trade partners, this is exactly the same as if it had engineered a "stealth" Plaza Accord in which it forced its trade partners to revalue their currencies by 25-43%. There is no difference between the two, and so if one way isn't an act of colonial oppression, the other way isn't either. The Global Times also argues that China's trade surplus and its manufacturing competitiveness have nothing to do with an undervalued RMB. If the PBoC actually believed this, it is pretty obvious what it should do – it should revalue the RMB as quickly as it can. There would be no cost to doing so as, presumably, Chinese manufacturers would be as globally competitive as ever, and it would immediately benefit Chinese households by raising the real value of their domestic income. Of course the reason the PBoC isn't doing this is because it knows (as most analysts know, including, I suspect, the editors of the Global Times) that this just isn't true. The claim that currency values don't affect trade imbalances is just silly. But to the extent that these kind of editorials reflect actual positions among policymakers, we should expect a difficult and probably painful outcome. Joan Robinson warned in the 1930s that mercantilist regimes that ran large, persistent trade surpluses would inevitably drive their trade partners to retaliate with their own forms of trade intervention once the costs of beggar-thy-neighbor trade surpluses were perceived as too high. We are clearly in Joan Robinson's world, and denying the problem is an extremely ineffective way of resolving it. We know this from the rather lengthy history. There have been many large trade imbalances – especially ones associated with large increases in debt – in the past 100 years, and they have usually ended very badly. The interesting question in retrospect has been why, and under what conditions, the brunt of the adjustment costs were ultimately borne by either the surplus countries or the deficit countries. I worry that because there is clearly no appetite among surplus and deficit economies to reduce the imbalances in the least painful way possible for both sides, and because the imbalances may have already gone too far for any compromise, we may be moving inexorably towards an adjustment process in which the costs are magnified, as each side tries to force the other to bear the brunt. globaltimes.cn/page/202606/13…

English
17
13
57
7.7K
landscape
landscape@Kinddragon3·
@Kathleen_Tyson_ These people merely want China to stop its industrial upgrading process. This is the path that both Japan and South Korea have taken. However, because China is so large in size and its politics is not controlled by the West, these people are extremely frightened!
English
0
0
0
89
landscape
landscape@Kinddragon3·
@Tsiberia 关注这个事情根本就是无聊。即使他是个韩国人,他可能有急事离开,或者忘记了。包容一下吧,屁大的事。没必要批判个不停!
中文
0
0
0
11
파란달(Bluemoon)
파란달(Bluemoon)@Tsiberia·
중국사람일 가능성이 있겠네요. 중국가서 놀랐던데 중국에서는 스타벅스, 맥도날드 등에서 먹고 그 자리에 놔두고 가는게 일반적이더라구요. 점원이 와서 치우는거라고 생각하는 것 같더군요. 처음에는 왜 저러나 싶었는데 모든 사람들이 그렇게 하더군요.
포케ㅣPOKE@poke_1004_luv

실시간 목격 ¯ࡇ¯ 50대 남성 두 분이 비즈니스 미팅은 30분 넘게 하더니 사용한 컵과 쓰레기는 1초 만에 버리고 가심 정확히는 테이블에…🤬 미친건가?? (결론은 내가 치웠음)

한국어
168
3
65
53.1K
匆匆
匆匆@sosoOMSA3·
ただし清朝考証学は今に至るまで漢学に一大巨頭を築いており、その価値は計り知れない。
日本語
7
0
25
4.6K
匆匆
匆匆@sosoOMSA3·
やっぱり清朝は中国だとあまり人気がないのですかね。歴史的経緯からして仕方ないのかもしれないが...
日本語
153
5
136
25.8K
landscape
landscape@Kinddragon3·
@D931931 你根本就没搞清楚他说的“波动”的意思!
中文
0
0
0
20
Jielin Dong 董洁林
听了开复这个访谈,几个关键点: 1,目前中国最好的大模型公司比美国落后15个月,而一年前只落后3个月; 2,中国的AI公司不知道商机在哪里,而做AI非常烧钱,尽管很多人喜欢玩AI,但愿意付钱的人太少,中国公司不给软件付钱; 3,他的01公司已经转型做帮助企业用AI模型的服务型公司了,付钱的客户都在中国之外; 4,开复仍然相信尽管美国做大模型领先,但中国做应用仍然会很好的;(我认为现在的局面并非如此,至少美国已经找到了大模型的一个万亿级应用,即编程;但这个应用在中国不值钱); 5,开复相信下一轮“世界模型”让AI在物理世界落地的时候,中国仍然可能领先。 看开复的字里行间和面部表情,他曾经的从容自信在消失……
Kai-Fu Lee@kaifulee

U.S. and China AI development will continue to fluctuate between 3 and 15 months. It's interesting that China is becoming open, and the U.S. is becoming closed. Great conversation with @alansmurray at the WSJ Leadership Institute CEO Summit. wsj.com/video/kai-fu-l…

中文
208
116
652
411.8K
GBC
GBC@GBC_Press·
🇨🇳🇦🇪 BREAKING: ​Beijing breaks protocol and rebukes Abu Dhabi: ​🔴 During the visit of the Crown Prince of Abu Dhabi, Sheikh Khaled bin Mohamed bin Zayed, to Beijing, reports indicate that the UAE tried to win over China by deepening economic ties in exchange for a clear demand: 🔴 Cut ties with Iran and dismantle the Sino-Iranian partnership. ​However, the response was decisive, delivering a rebuke to Abu Dhabi: "We choose our allies..." ​🔴 "Friendship with the UAE has limits, and it does not include interfering in our relations with Iran."
English
72
686
2.7K
508.2K
Amadou S Diop
Amadou S Diop@AmadouSowDiop·
@tv_ir_X Non, cette information est fausse et provient d'une rumeur infondée circulant sur les réseaux sociaux.
Français
1
0
2
745
Serkan Tanyildizi
Serkan Tanyildizi@srkntnyldz·
Çin’de ekonomik şartlar nedeniyle yıllarca evlenemeyen birçok insan, çözümü hâlâ görücü usulü ve tanışma buluşmalarında arıyor. Sosyal medyada viral olan bir videoda ise bir adam, görüştüğü kadının görüntülerini arkadaşına gönderip fikrini almak istedi. Ancak aldığı cevap hiç beklediği gibi olmadı. Arkadaşının “Hiç düşünmeden oradan ayrıl” demesi sonrası ikili arasında tartışma çıktığı belirtildi. Görüntüler kısa sürede milyonlarca kez izlendi.
Türkçe
256
164
3.9K
2.7M
landscape
landscape@Kinddragon3·
@srkntnyldz @cheeseliao 是,所有中国人写的你都不相信,你通过非中国人说的和写的来了解中国!
中文
0
0
0
11
landscape
landscape@Kinddragon3·
@bunnykoujou 据说,印太被川普取消了,现在又改回亚太了。😂
中文
0
0
0
9
マネージャー森
マネージャー森@bunnykoujou·
中国ではあまり知られていないようですが、日本の自衛隊は米軍のインド太平洋軍に組み込まれています。現在の戦争にはインテリジェンスが欠かせません。そして自衛隊はインテリジェンスを米軍に頼っています。 21世紀のこんにち、自衛隊が単独で、100年前と同じ方法で中国を侵略することはありえません
Nn-YyOo@yiBXocfAKT66912

@bunnykoujou emmm……不是这样的,中国在上世纪五十年代就已经称日本右翼为军国主义了。 之所以把这个词汇挂在嘴上,是因为右翼热衷于攻击,这种攻击不是基于明智或者正义,它只是一种想要攻击的意志。 所以并非中国昨天还在谈笑,今天突然要威胁日本,而是右翼像是日本的病,当有发病症状时,周边各国都会警惕。

日本語
2
0
1
172
ゆきこ 身長154cm、身長の半分が足の長さ
@SamuraiShibaJP 私は個性的な人間です。ただのモンゴル系でなくて手足長めです。日本人の祖先は縄文人と言われており、アイヌ人と関係しており、手先が器用で多彩な才能あり、芸術的文化と最先端文化も兼ね備えております。中国人の個性がない方とは違います。
日本語
7
1
1
1.5K
Samurai Shiba
Samurai Shiba@SamuraiShibaJP·
中国の友人がこう言ってた。 「中国人には ガツンと言った方がいいよ。 下手に出るとつけあがるから。」 日本は中国に遠慮して つけあがらせてばかりだと思った。
日本語
250
263
2.2K
37.5K
landscape
landscape@Kinddragon3·
@SamuraiShibaJP 如果你认为日本示弱了,那是因为美国占领军下的日本政府基于自身实力权衡的结果!事实上,日本无法自主做出独立的外交政策,这是事实。日本最高权力机关既不是国会,也不是首相,而是美日联合委员会!
中文
0
0
0
39
ゆきこ 身長154cm、身長の半分が足の長さ
@SamuraiShibaJP 日本が、中国製の粗悪品を使ってあげていたから、中国の凡人が飯を食えていたわけ、違いますか?中国は人口多いのに何も、特別な人間(プロフェッショナル)な人間がいらっしゃらないイメージあり、個性がなく、そっくりな顔、スタイルのコピー人間多い?と思います。
日本語
28
1
7
2.6K
John
John@johnAGI168·
Seedance 已经走得太快太远了,感觉其他模型已经无法追赶其脚步了! Seedance 2.5 能够直出 30 秒视频,参考素材可以达到恐怖 50 个,这次真的是遥遥领先遥遥领先🥇 Seedance 2.0 原生直出 4k 测试,细节直接拉满,好就是贵贵就是好😄 prompt 👇 【风格】国家地理自然纪录片(National Geographic Wildlife Documentary),IMAX电影画质,4K超清,真实摄影(Photorealistic),高帧率升格慢动作 【时长】10秒 【场景】海拔4500米的雪山岩壁,灰白碎石坡上薄雪覆盖,背景是青灰色的连绵山脊,天空阴沉,雪粒在风中横飞 [00:00-00:04] 镜头1:潜伏(Telephoto Close-Up, 600mm) 超长焦特写:一只雪豹趴在岩石后方,只露出半张脸和前爪。风吹动它脸颊两侧蓬松的灰白长毛,每一根毛尖带冰晶。琥珀色虹膜中瞳孔猛地收缩——它锁定了猎物。前爪无声地收紧,爪垫上粗糙的肉垫纹理清晰可见。 [00:04-00:07] 镜头2:爆发(High-Speed Tracking, 240fps Super Slow-mo) 侧面高速跟拍:雪豹从岩石后弹射而出,四肢完全伸展成一条直线,脊椎弯弓蓄力。后腿蹬踏岩面的瞬间,碎石和雪末被踢成扇形飞散。升格慢动作捕捉:尾巴像一条粗绳在空中画弧维持平衡,腹部的白色长毛在气流中翻卷。 [00:07-00:10] 镜头3:一击(Extreme Close-Up, Macro Lens) 极端特写:雪豹前爪拍击地面的瞬间,五指张开,弯曲的黑色利爪刺入薄雪层,溅起细碎的冰晶粒子在镜头前飞过(浅景深虚化)。定格在爪尖没入雪面的一帧,能看到爪钩弧度上反射的冷光。
中文
173
155
1.4K
174.1K
landscape
landscape@Kinddragon3·
@D931931 这是废话。现代国家建立在近代历史构建之上。不可能向上追溯几千年。现代世界,几乎所有国家都有凝聚内部的国家叙事, 是否完全真实都没有那么重要了。。这没有一点问题!!!
中文
0
0
0
28
Jielin Dong 董洁林
The so-called “Century of Humiliation” often invoked in China is, in this view, largely a narrative constructed by the ruling authorities to foster internal cohesion and mobilize opposition to external powers. More than a century ago, however, China was already being ruled by a foreign ethnic group—the Manchus—which had governed the Han Chinese majority for centuries. From this perspective, the subjugation of the Han Chinese under Manchu rule represented a far greater humiliation than the indignities inflicted on the Qing government by the Eight-Nation Alliance.
Ray Dalio@RayDalio

I recently spent a month in Asia, including 10 days in China, where I met with senior policy makers in several countries, and I found that over the past few months, there has been a big shift in the world order. I share my perspective in my latest article.  As always, I welcome your questions and thoughts.

English
128
36
179
64.8K
Kiwiboat
Kiwiboat@hailand·
@xy20191030 @seanwei001 这智商跟猪脑有的一拼,这么近的参照物能造成这么大的落差?呵呵
中文
4
0
13
2.7K
大变活人
大变活人@seanwei001·
华为的电动车广告,豪华舒适,而且中加入了私人影院。 这款车在美国被禁。 我担心的是,左边的窗户以250公里/时的速度运行,而右边的窗户却只有50公里/时? 这辆豪华电车正在穿越不同的时空吗???
中文
568
77
1.4K
1.7M