Laughing Chu

8.8K posts

Laughing Chu banner
Laughing Chu

Laughing Chu

@LaughingChu

Independent Journalist, Podcaster, Prepper, Developer, Chronicler of the Apocalypse https://t.co/3lL0lGqrUx https://t.co/gixkwC2Ezh https://t.co/KlBMdr5jyP

Occupied Europe เข้าร่วม Mayıs 2026
1.2K กำลังติดตาม458 ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Laughing Chu
Laughing Chu@LaughingChu·
Glancing Blows 578-S6EP58: Return to the 5th Century AD redwhiteandblackpill.libsyn.com/glancing-blows… The end of America as a superpower Half a trillion dollars worth of defeat No good choices A terrifying powervoid Bibi's folly Incoming wars Back to Ukraine Who owns Romania anyway
English
0
2
3
112
Laughing Chu
Laughing Chu@LaughingChu·
@deltathose yes they are. They live in the countryside. tehy would love to do these jobs but they are never offered to them
English
0
0
1
2
Laughing Chu
Laughing Chu@LaughingChu·
@SamaHoole Goats are not domesticated. They just agree to alive alongside us, by their own volition and for their own ends. Goats, like cats, are partners, not property
English
0
0
2
21
Sama Hoole
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole·
The goat was one of the first animals humanity ever domesticated, standing right at the dawn of the whole experiment. Long before the cow, before the plough had properly bitten, before the settled field was truly a field, there was the goat. More than ten thousand years ago, in the Zagros mountains of what is now Iran and the hills of Anatolia, human beings took the wild bezoar ibex and turned it into livestock. At Ganj Dareh, one of the oldest farming settlements on earth, the mud bricks still carry the imprints of little cloven hooves, pressed in while the clay was wet. The goat walked through the foundations of civilisation while we were still laying them. Ask why the goat came first, and you meet the same answer that explains almost everything about it. It asked for nothing. A cow needs deep grass and good ground. A goat needs a hillside everything else has given up on. It browses where there is no pasture, stripping leaves, bark, scrub, thistle and weed, turning the bitter and the thorny and the spoiled into milk and meat. It climbs where nothing else will climb. It survives the drought, the rock and the cold, the bad year that wipes out a richer man's herd. It breeds fast and travels light. You could keep a goat when you owned nothing but the goat, on land worth nothing to anyone above you. That is why it was first. The animal that needed the least became the one we tamed soonest, the beast a hungry, half-settled, nearly destitute people could actually keep alive. The goat got humanity through the door. And how have we thanked it. We made it the byword for poverty. The poor man's cow, said with a curl of the lip, the beast of those who could not run to cattle. We made it the scapegoat, in the oldest and most literal sense: the animal in the Book of Leviticus onto which a whole people heaped their sins before driving it out into the wilderness, never to return. When humanity needed something to carry away its guilt, it reached for the goat. Then we gave it the face of evil itself. Look at almost any image of the Devil and you are looking at a goat: the horns, the cloven hooves, the slotted yellow eye, the leering beard. The animal that fed the poorest people on earth became the chosen portrait of Satan. Notice the pattern. The goat is never hated for anything it actually does. The milk is good. The meat is good. The hide and the hair clothe you. It harms no one and asks for nothing. The contempt is aimed squarely at what it represents. Because the goat is the animal of the people with nothing. It is survival without land. It is abundance without permission. It is a full belly wrung out of bare rock by someone who was never meant to manage it, owing the men above him nothing at all. That freedom is the unforgivable thing. It always was. We tamed the goat first because it was the animal that needed us least. We have spent the ten thousand years since making it pay for that.
Sama Hoole tweet media
English
11
83
322
5.2K
Laughing Chu รีทวีตแล้ว
Agent Provocateur 👽👽👽
Jeder, der Kinder hat, weiß: Sein eigenes Kind zu verlieren dürfte der größte vorstellbare Schmerz sein. Es gibt nichts Schlimmeres, als sein eigenes Kind begraben zu müssen, und allein die Vorstellung zerreißt einem das Herz. Nun gibt es regelmäßig Vorfälle, bei denen Kinder durch einen Migranten ermordet wurden, der längst hätte abgeschoben werden müssen. Für die Eltern dieser Kinder dürfte sich folgende Frage aufdrängen: Würde mein Kind noch leben, wenn wir eine andere Asylpolitik hätten? Trägt die Politik offener Grenzen und lascher Abschiebungen eine Mitschuld am Tod meines Kindes? Nachdem ich Auszüge ihres Gesprächs mit Frau Amann gesehen habe, würde ich die kinderlose @jetteniz mal gerne fragen, was sie eigentlich den verwaisten Eltern sagen würde, deren Kind durch einen abschiebepflichtigen Asylbewerber ermordet wurde. Vielleicht sollte man Frau Nietzard auch mal auf die eigentliche Kernaufgabe des Staates hinweisen: Kernaufgabe des Staates ist es, das eigene Staatsvolk zu schützen. Es ist NICHT primäre Aufgabe des Staates, sich um das Wohlergehen von Migranten zu sorgen! Wenn überhaupt, ist die Sorge um das Wohl von Migranten vollkommen sekundär! Wenn man Frau Nietzard zuhört, hat man allerdings den gegenteiligen Eindruck: In ihrer Vorstellung ist die Sorge um das Wohlergehen von Flüchtlingen die primäre Aufgabe des Staates und die Sorge um das eigene Staatsvolk völlig sekundär. Sie macht sich mehr Gedanken darüber, dass ein krimineller Afghane in einem afghanischen Gefängnis schlecht behandelt wird, als darüber, dass ein Deutscher um sein eigenes Kind trauern muss. Jemand, der so falsche Prioritäten setzt, hasst offenbar das eigene Volk und sollte niemals auch nur in die Nähe politischer Ämter kommen.
Deutsch
22
51
285
4.7K
Laughing Chu
Laughing Chu@LaughingChu·
@tanya252 I remember it clearly being classified as medium high. But let's agree to disagree. I don't know about posy 2007.
English
0
0
0
1
pauline smith
pauline smith@tanya252·
@LaughingChu It was a medium secure unit in 2005/6. Women’s Enhanced started in around 2007. Not sure I know what you mean by ‘medium high’. But let’s agree to differ.
English
1
0
0
7
Diana Alastair💚🤍💜 ⚢ ❌❌✡️
So let me see if I have this straight. A care home sends a mentally disabled man on a trip to the zoo with only two people to mind him. He gets away from them and throws a toddler down a 15 foot drop into a pit full of crocodiles. The police then release him back to the same people who let him get away from them in the first place. How is ANY of that acceptable? Do they not have secure mental health facilities for the criminally insane? It’s hard to think of a better example of criminal insanity than throwing a toddler into a crocodile enclosure without understanding what you did. The facility he’s currently in clearly doesn’t take appropriate precautions to protect the general public from his behavior. I refuse to believe that this is the only time he’s ever been violent.
English
459
1.7K
12.1K
476.2K
Laughing Chu รีทวีตแล้ว
Tyler
Tyler@cillianblack·
The same people who laugh at the term “rape holocaust” used to describe the rape of at least 250,000 British children, will tell you that 20,000 dead Palestinians is a genocide. Who are these people? A mixture of woke Marxists and Islamists.
JJ B@JJBergkamp10

@cillianblack @GuzKhanOfficial "rape holocaust" 😂😂

English
4
9
31
335
Laughing Chu รีทวีตแล้ว
Emma Dunwell
Emma Dunwell@ESpeaksFreely·
Government logic: You must be over 16 to: - have social media - buy cigerettes - buy alchohol - obtain a provisional license - give sexual consent - open your own bank account - enter betting shops Also government logic: 11 year olds are allowed to: - understand sex change procedures and medication - make the decision to transition and give up the possibility of children, and maybe even orgasms - agree to cope with a wide array of lifelong physical and hormonal problems - agree to a lifetime of medication How on earth can a child consent to ANY of this but cannot buy cigerettes, or drive a car, or even HAVE SOCIAL MEDIA?!
BRITAIN IS BROKEN 🇬🇧@BROKENBRITAIN0

🚨BREAKING: CHILDREN as young as 11 YEARS OLD will be given puberty blockers as part of the UK government’s restarted “pathways trial” 🇬🇧

English
8
95
523
15.2K
Laughing Chu รีทวีตแล้ว
JustMyCupOfKaty
JustMyCupOfKaty@JustMyCupOfKaty·
Makerfield has spoken. The sad truth is that a socialist doesnt care how many raped or murdered children they need to step over in order to reach the ballot box.
English
1
3
56
514
Laughing Chu รีทวีตแล้ว
COOP
COOP@TexanDevilDog·
So feminists are ok with Muslims raping and abusing 250k British girls?
English
32
38
527
5.5K
Laughing Chu รีทวีตแล้ว
Fiona goddard
Fiona goddard@fionagoddarduk·
And the fact the MOJ keep saying they are releasing people like my abusers to make room for keeping serious criminals in prison is actually disgusting. When did the relentless rape, trafficking and all the other things involved in my abuse while i was only 14 to 18 years old,become not a serious offence? When did child rape become a normal, slap on the wrist crime? These men ruined my life for years. Took my innocence. Dehumanised me and broke me to the point I repetedly tried to take my own life just to escape from the misery I was trapped in. Only 9 ever faced prison, out of somewhere between 50 to 100 men that abused me! They called men from all over england to that house to rape children. One man was a known abuser of children in care for 20 years. I saw with my own eyes other girls they abused aswell. I was also told by the police they had links to unsolved murders and gun crime, yet apparently these are not serious criminals. The government says the grooming gangs commited some of the worst crimes ever, yet apparently that was a lie aswell because now they are saying they need to release these types of people to make room for serious criminals. I really dont even want to be in this country any more
English
32
245
807
5.6K
Laughing Chu รีทวีตแล้ว
PeterSweden
PeterSweden@PeterSweden7·
What I'm about to tell you is shocking. This sounds unreal, yet it happened in Sweden. A person from Syria arrived in Sweden in 2014. In 2017 he was convicted of horrible crimes. He broke into a woman's home and assaulted and r*ped her. He kidnapped another woman for 17 hours and r*ped her. What he did has been described as t*rture. He was sentenced to 4.5 years prison. But, upon review in 2021, the court found that he supposedly was a minor when he did the crimes. Therefore, the court ruled that he had spent too long in prison because he was sentenced as an adult originally. Sweden therefore paid him almost $88.000 in compensation for having been "too long" in prison. Meanwhile the two women only got $23.500 and $29.000 in compensation respectively. Sweden is lost.
English
46
866
3.8K
35.8K
Laughing Chu รีทวีตแล้ว
Sandu Negrea
Sandu Negrea@Cobra_196·
Astia nici ei nu mai stiu pentru ce protesteaza. Au trecut la termeni generici ca “apararea democratiei”. Ciudat ca nu au aparat-o cand a fost efectiv violata si calcata in picioare in noiembrie 2024.
Sandu Negrea tweet media
Română
1
1
11
70
Laughing Chu รีทวีตแล้ว
Sandu Negrea
Sandu Negrea@Cobra_196·
În timp ce "pro-ioropenii" își dau la gioale, se acuză unul pe altul că își fac dosare, Nicu e huiduit de toată propaganda, fiind strigat cu apelativul PeseDAN, George Simion este ales în unanimitate vicepreședinte ECR ... da, da, un grup bine reprezentat în Parlamentul European
Sandu Negrea tweet media
Română
1
8
27
184
Laughing Chu รีทวีตแล้ว
Jolie 🇺🇸
Jolie 🇺🇸@Jolie_Miller09·
One quarter of a million white girls were gang raped by Muslims and the BBC is silent. This is beyond shocking!
English
46
163
1.1K
7.6K
Laughing Chu
Laughing Chu@LaughingChu·
the most disgusting thing about the Tories is that they're lead by a Nigerin woman, and that is why she is allowed to talk about these things. If she had bene British she'd be called all sorts of names
English
0
0
2
21
Laughing Chu รีทวีตแล้ว
Sandu Negrea
Sandu Negrea@Cobra_196·
Dacă Nicușor Dan e ciuma roșie și omul rușilor, rezultă logic că proștii ăștia care l-au votat sunt oamenii rușilor. Atunci de ce ne-au făcut putiniști pe noi dacă ei au votat un om pe care azi îl fac putinist? Noi n-am votat niciun rus.😁
Română
0
1
9
80
Laughing Chu
Laughing Chu@LaughingChu·
I have no idea. I'm IT staff. But PLEASE UNDERSTAND: these numbers were from 2005-6. 20 years ago. MHA gives the patients insane rights. Every 6 months they can call for a Mental Health Review Tribunal where a buncg of doctors have to come and see evidence they got better, etc. It's a lot of bureaucracy and bullshit.
English
0
0
0
126