AutisticWavelength

"Surround yourself with people that challenge how you think Not people that nod their head and act like they agree" NF

TPUSA already released the audio of Charlie clearly stating he appoints Erika as successor. Demanding the full raw video after 8+ months is just more goalpost-moving with zero forensic proof it’s AI. There is no verified text from Charlie saying he feared for his life that Erika has been proven to lie about. That claim is another unproven implication from the gossip circuit with zero primary receipts.

@LogicalAlgo Okay - where is the video of Charlie stating he wanted Erika?! Why did Erika lie about the text that Charlie sent he was fearing for his life??

@Xcx1344066 Don't make a post then don't allow me to respond to it, that's a chicken shit move.

No. What you’re actually doing right now is textbook revisionism and face-saving. After hours of defending Candace’s heavy implications, pushing her conspiracy angles, nitpicking every piece of evidence against the shooter, and running the same loop of double standards and “investigative journalism” claims — you’re now pretending your entire position was just mild, reasonable “skepticism” and that you “never claimed Candace’s narrative should be accepted as unquestionable reality.” You’re literally rewriting the thread in real time because you got cornered with zero receipts. That distinction you’re claiming now? You didn’t make it earlier. You’re inventing it on the way out. This is exactly why these conversations go nowhere with you people. When facts hit, you don’t concede — you revise history and act like the other person missed the point. Move on. You’re done.

@LogicalAlgo @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO 2of2: That distinction is what you’ve failed to grasp this entire thread.

Today on the show: -It becomes increasingly likely that the Charlie audio “I appoint Erika” was A.I. We explain why this may become the single most consequential lie. -Erika becomes a doctor. -Nick Shirley is rightly called into question. youtube.com/live/KpxIBWkNs…

Finally. Thank you. You just openly admitted you’ve spent this entire thread (and 8+ months) repeatedly reasserting Candace’s conspiracy version with zero primary receipts because you personally believe her implications should simply be accepted as reality. That has literally been my point for hours: you treat anonymous “whistleblowers,” Egyptian planes with timing errors, Fort Huachuca implications (while ignoring Harpole’s travel records), AI audio demands, and “Bride of Charlie” gossip as serious evidence — then mistake your confidence level for objective proof. Doesn’t that feel better now that it’s flipped?

@LogicalAlgo @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO 2of2: That has literally been my point for hours: you treat contested evidence as settled fact, then mistake your confidence level for objective proof. Doesn’t that feel better?

No. I presented the actual evidence the prosecution has on record so far: the shooter’s handwritten note to his boyfriend, texts + Discord confessions admitting he did it for political reasons, cooperative boyfriend testifying against him, DNA, fingerprints, campus video timeline, and ballistics. I dismissed the conspiracy theories and heavy implications from a gossip podcaster (staged hit, AI audio, Egyptian planes with timing errors, Fort Huachuca/Harpole, “Bride of Charlie,” etc.) because she has provided zero primary receipts that override any of the above. I’ve made zero assumptions, no implications, no pivots, no deflections, and no goalpost-moving. I’ve stuck to the same facts the entire thread. I keep repeating the evidence to get it through your thick ass skull because you still don’t get it. Remove your head from Candace’s ass and deal with reality.

@LogicalAlgo @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO 2of 2: then pretend your own assumptions are just neutral objectivity. You didn’t “lay out facts.” You laid out the narrative you already fully believe, then spent hours confusing your confidence level with proof.

Your entire pattern in this thread is crystal clear and predictable: Start with procedural nitpicks (501(c)(3) “public trust,” demanding internal videos from a private nonprofit). Shift to false double standards (lawsuits vs. murder trial). Defend Candace as “investigative journalism” using anonymous “whistleblowers,” Mitch Snow, Egyptian planes with timing errors, and Fort Huachuca implications (while ignoring Harpole’s travel records). Nitpick the shooter’s evidence (“disputed,” “contested,” “digital”) without ever posting a single counter-receipt. When cornered with facts — the shooter’s handwritten note, texts, Discord confessions, DNA, prints, campus video, and cooperative boyfriend — pivot to personal attacks, sarcasm (“sorry I offended your lady”), condescension, and accusing me of being closed-minded and arrogant. End by declaring the conversation “unproductive” while regurgitating the same debunked talking points. You’ve provided zero primary evidence that overrides the shooter’s own confessions or any of the debunked Candace claims (staged hit, AI audio, “Bride of Charlie,” Israel shift, etc.). This isn’t skepticism. This is textbook low-reach drama orbiting: protect the influencer narrative at all costs, never admit the lack of receipts, and project your own closed-mindedness onto everyone else. I’ve laid out the facts. You’ve run the same loop for hours.

@LogicalAlgo @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO 2of2: Meanwhile every contradictory source becomes “mommy sleuths,” “gossip,” or “conspiracy” by default because you already decided Candace is illegitimate before the discussion even started.

@JayWill79234 @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO I've repeated the current evidence we have, you have repeated the same conspiracy theories Candace has, you have taken her playbook of deflection and pivoting, and wasted your time.

@LogicalAlgo @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO 2of2: You, meanwhile, kept repeating the same evidence package as if repetition itself resolves the disputes people have with it.

@JayWill79234 @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO The difference between us is I'm open to the fact that TR may not have done this all by himself, but I want to hear what the evidence against him first is. While you blindly follow a gossip podcaster over the cliff.

@LogicalAlgo @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO 2of2: I understood your position ages ago. You trust the institutional/prosecution narrative almost entirely and view contradictory sources as illegitimate by default. Repeating the same talking points louder doesn’t change that underlying divide.

@JayWill79234 @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO I understand your position, I don't buy the conspiracy theories, I don't care what Candace says, she doesn't back anything up with evidence. The trial will be on TV, everyone will get to see it, and then we will see what happens.

@JayWill79234 @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO What the hell do you think your doing?

@LogicalAlgo @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO 1of2: You’ve basically just repeated the exact same list of disputed claims/evidence for the 20th time while insisting repetition magically transforms contested points into unquestionable fact.

This post perfectly reveals your thinking. You’ve run out of actual evidence or counter-facts, so you flip the script: accuse me of “jumping in,” lacking self-awareness, and being dogmatic — while you’ve spent the entire thread regurgitating Candace’s debunked conspiracy talking points (staged hit, AI audio, Egyptian planes, Fort Huachuca, etc.) with zero primary receipts that override the shooter’s handwritten note, texts, Discord confessions, DNA, prints, campus video, or Harpole’s travel records. You’re not engaging evidence. You’re protecting the narrative at all costs and declaring the conversation “unproductive” the moment facts corner you. That’s exactly why this is 8+ months of low-evidence gossip content instead of journalism.

@LogicalAlgo @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO 2of2: You call Candace conspiratorial while treating your own preferred narrative as so self-evidently true that anyone questioning it must be irrational, malicious or “in a cult.” That level of self-awareness deficit is exactly why this stopped being productive.

Um, no. What I’ve done is exactly what you asked: Listed every major Candace claim that’s been debunked (staged hit, AI audio, Egyptian planes, Fort Huachuca/Harpole, “Bride of Charlie,” Israel shift, etc.) — you gave zero response. Laid out the actual evidence against Tyler Robinson: handwritten note to his boyfriend, texts + Discord confessions admitting political motive, cooperative boyfriend testifying against him, DNA, fingerprints, campus video, and ballistics. Explained why Candace is getting sued for defamation (reckless implications with no receipts, doubling down after exculpatory evidence). You still haven’t presented anything that overrides that primary evidence. You’re just regurgitating Candace’s debunked talking points and conspiracy theories like they’re facts. I’m not a blind sheep. Candace claims to be Christian while spending months denying basic evidence and turning a widow’s grief into gossip content. That’s not “skepticism” — that’s infighting. You have no point left. Move on.

@LogicalAlgo @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO I think something like: "Sorry, my toddler typed that while I refilled my coffee" would have been a better response. Rich coming from a guy who repeatedly treats disputed claims/evidence as if they’re unquestionable established fact despite repeated objections to the contrary.

@JayWill79234 @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO This isn't a debate. I don't think you have read one reply I've given you. Or you would have stopped a long time ago. You are talking in circles, pivoting, just doing all the same shit all of you do. I've proved my point, you don't have a point.

@LogicalAlgo @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO 2of2: Law firms taking cases is not proof reality has already been settled. That’s literally the entire purpose of adversarial courts. Honestly, comments like that make me wonder if my debate partner tapped out and changed halfway through this discussion.

@LauraLoomer What are the laws on standing your ground if you feel threatened?

How is this happening in America! Total insanity. I cannot believe this shit.

Realistic actions he can take right now (DHS authority): Target non-citizens immediately: ICE (under DHS) can investigate, arrest, and deport illegal aliens, visa overstays, or green-card holders involved in the march if they violate immigration law or provide “material support” to Hezbollah (a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization). This is straightforward enforcement — no new laws needed. Refer cases for denaturalization: For naturalized U.S. citizens who hid terrorism ties or engaged in terrorism-related activity when they naturalized, DHS/ICE can refer them to DOJ for denaturalization proceedings. This is slow (civil court process) but has been done before for serious cases. Escalate federal coordination: Direct FBI/DOJ on potential criminal charges for material support to Hezbollah. DHS can also increase surveillance, revoke visas, and tighten entry vetting for people from high-risk countries. Policy pressure: Push Trump’s broader America First agenda — mass deportation priorities, ending sanctuary policies in NYC, and using National Guard if local law enforcement (NYPD) won’t act.

Respectfully @SecMullinDHS Are you even doing your job? I want so badly to believe you didn’t sell your soul when you went to Qatar over New Year… But you are silent over these Sharia Supremacists and I don’t see you with a plan for denaturalizing and deporting these unruly Muslims. If you aren’t going to do your job, I think you should resign.

@JayWill79234 @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO Do you really think that the Assistant DA's founded law firm would have taken this case if they don't have everything prepared?

@LogicalAlgo @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO 3of3: So discovery may not be the one-sided event you seem to imagine. If anything, compelled testimony/discovery is exactly where unresolved sourcing disputes, timelines, communications & inconsistencies finally get tested under oath instead of through PR statements.

@JayWill79234 @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO The only divide here is you can't wrap your head around the facts.

@LogicalAlgo @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO 2of2: I’m far more open to questioning narratives when timelines, evidence handling, sourcing disputes & unanswered questions exist. That’s the real divide here.

@JayWill79234 @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO No, I'm just saying that there will be a trial and I don't buy into Conspiracy theories that Candace has come up with in the past 8 months.

@LogicalAlgo @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO 1of2: At this point we’re mostly talking past each other. You fundamentally trust the institutional/prosecution narrative by default and view nearly all contradictory sources as conspiracy garbage.

It's a major disaster for her. She thinks she has subpoena power. She can only call witnesses that are related to this case and can only get discovery related to this case with it. This isn't a blanket she can get whatever she wants and call Erika Kirk to the stand to question her. Erika has nothing to do with this case. But Erika and TPUSA get to have a look at all the internal documents on how Candace operates and then get to file their lawsuits against her with an advantage. This is doom for Candace. Why isn't Candace suing Loomer and Boreing over her husbands DUI? Because he got arrested. And she know if she sues, she will lose. She has literally fucked herself.

@LogicalAlgo @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO 1of?: What’s ironic is you frame discovery as some looming disaster for Candace, when discovery cuts both ways. Candace is publicly accessible for hours daily, openly discusses disputes/sourcing & repeatedly requests clarification/comment from ppl involved.

I’m guessing we’re talking about the Tyler Robinson (TR) case, because Candace doesn’t provide actual evidence — she provides implications and conspiracy theories. Yes, people can dispute evidence all they want. That’s their right. But Candace isn’t bringing logical, evidence-based disputes to the table. She’s spent 8+ months implying or heavily suggesting that Trump, the US Government, French Government, Israeli Government, “the Jews,” TPUSA insiders, Erika Kirk, Brian Harpole, Egyptian airplanes, and who knows who else all conspired to murder Charlie Kirk. That’s not skepticism. That’s wild conspiracy theory territory with zero primary receipts overriding the shooter’s own handwritten note, texts, Discord confessions, DNA, fingerprints, campus video, and ballistics. I don’t take that kind of conspiracy garbage seriously, and I’ll keep blasting Candace and her gossip cult for turning a widow’s grief and a lone-shooter case into 8+ months of low-evidence content and infighting.

@LogicalAlgo @Tridetropencha @RealCandaceO 2of2: Until you admit the evidence itself is disputed/questioned by many ppl, we’re not even debating from the same starting point.