Laurence Fox

The fight back begins! Today I received £482,315.32 And most importantly a new trial. Never give in! Never surrender!

@HowardCCox Thank you Howard. This is just the beginning. A good lesson in patience and perseverance. 🙏

Great news, Lozza. You stayed the course and won. Huge admiration for you and well done mate.

@LeilaniDowding You need to get more chickens. You don’t have enough chickens. 🐓

Finished off the new chicken coop.

What about the bodily autonomy of the defenceless unborn child?

Starmer is finished whatever happens in may. He is better positioned to serve this country as deputy assistant vice head of menswear at a rural branch of Debenhams.

So bored these displays of cultural dominance. So bored of guests lecturing their hosts on what its nations values are. We don’t wander down the road in Marrakesh singing come Kumbaya, my Lord, kumbaya. Please do return the courtesy.

Nick Timothy and Nigel Farage are right, and Sadiq Khan and Keir Starmer are wrong. Small groups of people, of whatever religion, praying in public places is fine. And as a Christian country we should allow a special privilege for churches to lead services in our national spaces, like the Palm Sunday celebration that happens in Trafalgar Square. What we don't want is mass ritual observances intended to claim the civic realm for another religion, or assert the domination of another culture over our own Christian traditions. What happens in our national spaces is not neutral. People use Trafalgar Square, for celebrations and demonstrations, to make a point about the kind of country they want us to be. The Palm Sunday pageant reminds us of who we are - not as individuals (many or most of us don't identify as Christians at all) but as a national community, with the roots of our institutions in the ground of the Bible and our most solemn communal moments, from coronations to funerals, mediated through the liturgies of the Church. A mass Adhan held there, or in any town square, is making a different point: that Britain is not a Christian country, and that - inshallah - one day it shall be Muslim. This is unacceptable to the British public and indeed incompatible with our constitution. As ever with these debates, the issue is partly one of kind and partly one of degree. There is an issue with Islam itself as a religion which in most interpretations does not admit of pluralism or freedom of conscience, and therefore is inherently aggrandising, including over territory. But with a bit of confidence and a bit of toleration we could handle that - if it were not for the issue of degree. It is the scale of Islam in Britain, and the ambition of its leaders for greater scale, that makes the problem. The numbers of people who assembled for the adhan in Trafalgar Square, clearly and openly claiming the territory for a faith with no connection (indeed, with strong doctrinal disagreement) with the model of Western liberal democracy that Britain has developed and exported to the world - that is the problem. The numbers, whether everyone there understood it this way or not (and I suspect many did), convey an explicit threat to the foundations of our country. Being relaxed about other people's religion is a good thing, a very British thing. I don't mind modern druids dancing around Stonehenge in my constituency (arguably, though the historicity is tenuous, they have a claim to the place). I don't mind small groups of Hindus or Buddhists or Muslims demonstrating the reality of Britain's religious toleration by worshiping in Trafalgar Square. But let's not kid ourselves about this adhan, or pretend that we're just seeing another harmless expression of Britain's religious diversity. We are seeing an abuse of liberalism, led by people who are not themselves liberal; or - let us imagine they are acting in good faith - who are themselves deceived about what they are doing. It should not happen again. And it would be good to hear the Church of England say so.

There should be no right not to be offended, and no categories deemed so sacred that they receive special exemption from the free speech rule

Good night twatter. Every single human life is sacred. Not a single idea is. No one is coming to save you. You are the change. 🙏

I would ban the taper fade before I banned Islam. It’s such a terrible look.

Across this once great land the people have had enough.

👏👏👏

@drdina1 @Hitendra2020 @AllisonPearson @CaliforniaFrizz It’s hard to respect someone who hides behind an avatar. God bless you Dina. I hope we meet one day.

@Hitendra2020 @AllisonPearson @LozzaFox @CaliforniaFrizz I'm a black American. I've lived in 5 countries. Been black in all of them. Believe me, I know real racism when I face it.

Laurence Fox is not and has never been a racist. It’s fantastic news that he has got redress for the horrible attacks on his reputation which destroyed his acting career. Let the would-be Cancellers take note!

We need to stop trying to destroy the lives of people we disagree with. We must understand how fundamental free expression and a plurality of views is to a healthy society. We have to set the example. Never stop protecting the rights of those you disagree with the most.

Please fuck off and when you have finished fucking off, please continue to fuck off for a good distance until you find a place to live which treat women like property and despises free speech. When you have reached that place, please fuck off some more. Oh, and fuck Islam. 👋

@drdina1 @AllisonPearson @CaliforniaFrizz Thank you Dina. 🙏

I'm a huge fan of @LozzaFox and his beautiful wife @CaliforniaFrizz! We've been in contact for years after he did something rare - he asked questions about systemic racism and engaged to discuss the answers. I've been a fan of his acting for a long time. I'm thrilled he won some redress. (Perhaps use some of it to visit Nashville?)

I will make myself available at any time which suits @Fox_Claire.

@LeoKearse Than you brother. And also thank you for making me laugh on a daily basis.

I am delighted to see Laurence emerge victorious from the defamation spat between him and some ponces. The original judgement was ridiculous - as if anyone would take his descriptions of the ponces seriously, or see it as anything other than a satirical rebuke to the genuinely damaging things they'd said about him. Sanity is restored.

I am sorry you are being attacked. Would you be amenable to a public conversation with me where you can elaborate on your sincerely held views. I know how much freedom of expression means to you. I’m sure people would be interested to know the reasons behind your vote.

Thanks brother. 🙏 May 16th will be the most significant day for Britain in years. You say you want your country back? YES WE DO!