Ryan

When someone calls me a transphobe/homophobe

@RealShawFatherr @PoliSisyphus @Variety Go hop back on Bidens lap and stfu

@PoliSisyphus @Variety There wasn’t a manosphere who profited from angering incels in the 1980s

#Supergirl star Milly Alcock knows she'll face backlash by "simply existing as a woman in [franchise IP]." "We have become very comfortable having this weird ownership of women’s bodies. I can’t really stop them. I can only be myself." variety.com/2026/film/news…

@MutantCB @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 Why do you presume God wanted you or anyone else to be able to scientifically verify whether or not Jesus rose from the grave? The absence of such evidence is not proof God doesn’t exist nor is it even evidence he doesn’t exist.

@M7_Reaper @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 I'm aware of what you're referring to, but confirming that the same individual that was dead is the same individual that was alive again would at least be a start, but we can't even do that, can we?

If sunlight kills vampires and the moon is just reflecting the sun’s light…. Why doesn’t moonlight kill vampires too? 🤔😉

@MutantCB @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 You clearly aren’t the right person because you haven’t said a single thing I haven’t heard 1000 times before. Same weak virtually non-existent arguments, even weaker rebuttals. You want to believe so badly that you are the one with a rational worldview but the opposite is true

@M7_Reaper @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 I know you believe that because you don't understand the theory well enough. We can go on about this all day but Twitter is absolutely not the right space to fill in the gaps of your ignorance, and I'm probably not the one to do it anyways.

@MutantCB @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 Yet you require scientific testing for the claim of God yet its not a claim testable by science… 🤡

@M7_Reaper @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 I don't require scientific testing for truth, either. It depends on the nature of the claim.

@MutantCB @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 You cannot have “evidence” of something never witnessed, tested nor demonstrated. All you have is a fantasy, nothing more.

@M7_Reaper @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 Lol no that's now how that works. The evidence came first. Theories *describe* the evidence. Again, you keep having the gall to call me ignorant when it's so plainly clear you don't understand some of the fundamentals at play here.

@MutantCB @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 Again YOU require scientific testing for truth, not me. You fail to meet your own standard, not me.

@M7_Reaper @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 Let's take the resurrection. What forensic methodology can you apply to that claim? Do you have access to the body, either dead or "resurrected?" Are you able to examine the grave and interview alleged witnesses? No? That's what I thought.

@MutantCB @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 You can literally remove the idea that all life shares a common ancestor from the Earth and absolutely nothing in biology changes.

@M7_Reaper @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 It's not "my nonsense theory", it's been the predominant model used by the scientific community for over a century. Also scientific theories are not facts and they're not purporting to be. You keep having the gall to call me uneducated yet you keep making these very simple errors

@MutantCB @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 You started with a conclusion first in the theory of evolution lol no one seen a reptile become a mammal

@M7_Reaper @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 Mmm no it's pretty much a fact. Starting with a conclusion first (the stories in the Bible) and then finding "evidence" to support that narrative is exactly backwards from how scientific methodology or *any* good reasoning works.

@MutantCB @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 “No good reason” is purely subjective. What objective standard do you have to qualify something as a “good reason”? And btw you don’t need to be an expert to believe it but you have to be an expert to reject it? You people really are the lowest in the IQ pool.

@M7_Reaper @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 No, which is why I'm not sitting here pretending like I'm an expert who can just reject it all for no good reason.

@MutantCB @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 You can claim all the evidence in the world, still doesn’t magically change your nonsense theory into a fact.

@M7_Reaper @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 Again, "proof" is not an applicable term. LOTS of evidence exists that supports evolutionary theory, that's why it's still the bedrock of modern biology.

@MutantCB @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 That’s your ignorant uneducated opinion.

@M7_Reaper @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 Never mind scientifically demonstrate, you can't demonstrate the truth of those beliefs in *any* fashion whatsoever.

@MutantCB @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 Have you? Lmfao

@M7_Reaper @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 Have you been in the laboratories? Have you understood the methodologies used to draw the conclusions? Have you performed your own testing and experiments to falsify results? No? Then you don't have a good reason.

@MutantCB @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 My beliefs aren’t rooted in what I can scientifically demonstrate buddy, yours is. Allegedly

@M7_Reaper @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 You missed the point. Not that I'm surprised. But hey, if you want to play that game, you can't go back in time and observe Noah's Flood or the Resurrection, either, and unlike scientific claims those stories require *massive* assumptions.

@MutantCB @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 So you openly admit no proof for the clown theory exists? Yet you believe it and reject the belief in God due to a lack of proof? Funny how hypocritical atheists are.

@M7_Reaper @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 The fact that you think claims like this are "proven" is another gap in your understanding. "Proof" is a mathematical term, not a scientific one. Scientific theories are not "proven", but they demonstrate their utility by aligning with repeated experimentation and prediction.

@MutantCB @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 Thats your very subjective opinion.

@M7_Reaper @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 You can't reject it without good reason, and you don't have one.

@MutantCB @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 Claim and I cannot “prove” my claim. The fact you pretend otherwise PROVES you are in fact the ignorant uneducated one on the topic.

@MutantCB @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 And yes I can reject that “evidence” because evidence is just that, evidence. It requires INTERPRETING. You look at fossils and were brainwashed to believe they are evidence of the theory of evolution. I look at them and see evidence of Noah’s flood. You cannot “prove” your

@MutantCB @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 False equivalence bozo, I can go to Singapore. I don’t need to rely on your word, “experts” word, or anyone else’s word or even “evidence”. I can go there and prove to myself it exists. I cannot do that with the claim that a reptile became a mammal nor can you.

@M7_Reaper @ke86108 @dat_dogg_shaggy @TedLogan1010 Direct observation is not the only form of evidence. I've never been to Singapore to confirm its existence with my own eyes, but tons of evidence that it exists is out there and I'd be pretty foolish to reject it simply because I haven't personally observed it.