Mark Jeffrey

93.1K posts

Mark Jeffrey banner
Mark Jeffrey

Mark Jeffrey

@markjeffrey

Partner at Bittensor Fund @stillcorecap Hash Rate podcast

Los Angeles เข้าร่วม Aralık 2007
1.9K กำลังติดตาม71.1K ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Mark Jeffrey
Mark Jeffrey@markjeffrey·
Hash Rate - Ep. 163: Beam SN105 - Decentralized Bandwidth 🧙 Guest: @Nic_B1m of @b1m_ai (0:00) - Intro and Beam's Mission (1:18) - Beam's Technology and Incentives (4:57) - SOC and HIPPA Compliance (15:10) - Alphanomics (28:35) - Community Trust and Future Plans (41:08) - Agent Marketing: "Business to Claw" (50:06) - Final Thoughts and Connections
English
6
18
93
10.6K
Mark Jeffrey
Mark Jeffrey@markjeffrey·
Yes this is big.
YVR τrader@YVR_Trader

🚨 MASSIVE: @THORChain is integrating $TAO This means you’ll soon swap native BTC → native TAO directly onchain with no CEX, no wrapped tokens, no middleman. 🔁 One step: $BTC from your Bitcoin wallet → $TAO in your Bittensor wallet. This unlocks: •Deep cross-chain liquidity between Bitcoin and AI compute markets •Direct on-chain access to deAI via TAO •Massive volume potential as BTC holders enter the Bittensor ecosystem Decentralized money + decentralized intelligence = the future of crypto. Thorchain x Bittensor is a liquidity bridge between Bitcoin and AI. The AI economy just became trustless.

English
3
4
44
2.2K
Mark Jeffrey รีทวีตแล้ว
TAO.com
TAO.com@TAO_dot_com·
“Episode 11 of the Carrot and the Stick is live from TAO.com! Watch @Carrot_____1 and @KeithSinger discuss the attention on Bittensor, seeding subnet liquidity, and the future of validators.
English
0
5
14
1.7K
Mark Jeffrey รีทวีตแล้ว
Keith Singery
Keith Singery@KeithSingery·
had a chance to fund this one and let it go. Whoops? Maybe. My impression of @Nic_B1m from our talks was a dude trying to genuinely go after a big opportunity and do it the best he and his team can through Bittensor.
Mark Jeffrey@markjeffrey

Hash Rate - Ep. 163: Beam SN105 - Decentralized Bandwidth 🧙 Guest: @Nic_B1m of @b1m_ai (0:00) - Intro and Beam's Mission (1:18) - Beam's Technology and Incentives (4:57) - SOC and HIPPA Compliance (15:10) - Alphanomics (28:35) - Community Trust and Future Plans (41:08) - Agent Marketing: "Business to Claw" (50:06) - Final Thoughts and Connections

English
0
1
20
1.8K
Mark Jeffrey รีทวีตแล้ว
Algod
Algod@AlgodTrading·
Bittensor obviously has flaws: -few issues with the incentive mechanism -overal subnet quality can be better -multi consensus could open up more use cases That being said, the quality is increasing at a rapid pace, many people from frontier labs and so on starting to build and compete, one of the few narratives in crypto that actually makes sense Show me another project in crypto with the same potential and development activity as bittensor
English
45
62
422
21.3K
Kyle Samani
Kyle Samani@KyleSamani·
I'm debating @Jason next week about TAO What is everything I need to know about TAO going into the debate? Give me the good, the bad, and the ugly please!
English
157
16
411
135.9K
Mark Jeffrey รีทวีตแล้ว
Rock Chartrand🤑
Rock Chartrand🤑@RockChartrand·
Translation: I’ve identified where wealth exists, so I’m going to redefine taking it as “fairness.” No crime is being alleged. No rights violation is being corrected. The entire justification is that someone has more, therefore the state is entitled to it. Notice how “fair share” is never defined by principle, only by target. It’s not about equal rights under the law, it’s about unequal treatment justified by outcome. One group produces, another is politically selected to pay. And the quiet part: if this were actually about funding something effective, there’d be accountability for what’s already been taken. Instead, failure just becomes the argument for taking more. So it isn’t about justice. It’s about normalizing the idea that success is a liability and entitlement is a claim.
Elizabeth Warren@SenWarren

Elon Musk has 6.5 MILLION times more wealth than the typical American. It’s time for a wealth tax — billionaires must pay their fair share.

English
135
372
1.4K
39.4K
Sami Kassab
Sami Kassab@Old_Samster·
Why aren’t you debating a bittensor OG? My DMs are open
Kyle Samani@KyleSamani

I'm debating @Jason next week about TAO What is everything I need to know about TAO going into the debate? Give me the good, the bad, and the ugly please!

English
9
9
130
6.2K
Mark Jeffrey
Mark Jeffrey@markjeffrey·
This is wild. The recent Solana hack ended up bridged to USDC -- but Circle is doing nothing about it (?) ... Whereas Tether would have frozen the funds??? "The attacker deliberately avoided Tether. They knew Circle wouldn't freeze."
Jesus Martinez@JesusMartinez

$285 million stolen from Solana's biggest DeFi protocol in 12 minutes. The attacker bridged $232 million in stolen USDC through Circle's own bridge. During business hours. Circle did nothing. And this keeps happening. Drift Protocol was the #1 perps DEX on Solana. $550 million TVL. Backed by Multicoin, Polychain, Blockchain Capital. Passed two security audits. On April 1st, North Korea's Lazarus Group drained it in 12 minutes flat. People thought it was an April Fools joke. It wasn't. The hack started 3 weeks earlier. • Attacker withdrew ETH from Tornado Cash. Created a fake token called CarbonVote ($CVT) • Seeded $500 in liquidity. Wash traded for weeks to build a fake oracle price • Socially engineered 2 of 5 multisig signers on Drift's Security Council • March 27. Drift migrated its security council. Attacker exploited the window • April 1. Listed fake CVT on Drift. Raised withdrawal limits. 31 rapid withdrawals. Done Not a code bug. Social engineering. $550 million secured by 5 people. Only needed 2 to drain it. Same playbook as Bybit ($1.5B) and Ronin ($625M). All Lazarus Group. All social engineering. The attacker is sitting on $268 million right now. 130,000 ETH. Visible on Arkham. They swapped everything to USDC. Bridged from Solana to Ethereum using Circle's own CCTP. The funds sat in wallets for 1 to 3 hours. Circle did nothing. The attacker deliberately avoided Tether. They knew Circle wouldn't freeze. But 8 days earlier Circle froze 16 business wallets tied to a sealed civil case. Exchanges and payment processors disrupted overnight. ZachXBT then dropped the "Circle USDC Files." $420 million in alleged compliance failures since 2022. Case after case where hacked or illicit funds were not frozen while other issuers acted faster. • Drift Protocol. $232M. No freeze • Swapnet. $13M. No freeze • GMX. $9M. No freeze • Lazarus Group Research. $1.56M. Late action • Celsius Protocol. $61M. Late action Drift is just the latest line on a growing list. Three independent firms confirmed Lazarus Group. TRM Labs. Elliptic. DivergSec. Codename TraderTraitor. Same unit behind the biggest hacks in crypto history. The US government has linked these thefts directly to North Korea's weapons program. The pattern is always the same. Social engineering. Compromised signers. Pre-signed transactions. Fast bridging. Slow response from stablecoin issuers. Audits don't catch this. Drift passed two from top firms. The code was fine. The people weren't. An audit is a snapshot. Not a guarantee. If a protocol can be drained by 2 people, it's not decentralized. USDC can't be neutral infrastructure while choosing when to freeze and when to look away. Pick a side.

English
8
3
15
3.1K