szo

Our warriors continue to apply sanctions against Russia’s shadow oil fleet – two such vessels were struck in the waters at the entrance to the port of Novorossiysk. These tankers had been actively used to transport oil – not anymore. I am grateful to Chief of the General Staff Andrii Hnatov for leading the operation, to the counterintelligence officers of the Security Service of Ukraine, and to our Navy for consistently delivering effective results. Ukraine’s long-range capabilities will continue to be developed comprehensively – at sea, in the air, and on land. Glory to Ukraine!

@spinningrat69 @Pyeholio @Defence_Index I done you over completely 🤣 You are going back to the delusional safety features talk when i have already proved you wrong . If Australia decide they want to buy challenger 2-3 , or the leopard tank you will be first to say the abrams is trash 🤣

@Masteryoshix @Pyeholio @Defence_Index I’m looking right now just to entertain you here and they have it all placed 5th with the Leclerc 4th,K2 3rd, Leo 2nd and Abrams first. So once again it is the worst mbt nato has with the only possible other option for worst being the Ariete as it also lacks these safety features

🇩🇪🇪🇺 Europe’s most advanced tank is entering service. The Leopard 2A8 has now been showcased in live field trials with the Norwegian Army, marking a major step toward operational deployment. 🇳🇴 Norway will be among the first to field it, with deliveries starting in 2026 and running through 2028. Next gen armor. NATO firepower evolving.

@spinningrat69 @Pyeholio @Defence_Index Not dellusional , You can just google your qustion and see challenger as top result 🤣

@Masteryoshix @Pyeholio @Defence_Index You are delusional to think the chally 2 is the safest nato mbt when it lacks basic modern safety features and is the only nato mbt to have a 100% turret detach rate while also always being catastrophically destroyed.50 year old tank and it still is more capable than the chally 2

@spinningrat69 @Pyeholio @Defence_Index 1. Challenger 2 / Challenger 3 (United Kingdom) - Top ContenderWhy it's the safest: It is notoriously difficult to destroy. It features classified Dorchester/Chobham composite armor, which offers arguably the best kinetic and chemical protection of any Western tank- Google

@spinningrat69 @Pyeholio @Defence_Index You are delusional , You think a 50 year old abrams tank is a modern battle tank 🤣📷

@Masteryoshix @Pyeholio @Defence_Index The friction caused by the rifled barrel causes apfsds to have a muzzle velocity to roughly 1530m/s while other nato mbts with a 120mm smooth bore have 1700m/s. The numbers you put out aren’t all that impressive given any modern mbt can do that if given the opportunity.

@spinningrat69 @Pyeholio @Defence_Index 14 challengers 2 donated in 2023 - only 2 destroyed in 3+ years 80 abrams tanks donated - All destroyed in the first month 😆👏 Hows that for survivability ?You are trying to Glaze the abrams when they got obliterated They are not even on the ukraine battlefield mate 🤣

@Masteryoshix @Pyeholio @Defence_Index There are countless videos of these tanks taking hits from fpvs in key areas and living or at the very least the crew members surviving which is the most important thing. Yet the chally 2 literally cannot take one hit in a critical area like these tanks without the crew dying.

@spinningrat69 @Pyeholio @Defence_Index The challenger 2 - $7 million compared to the $25 million abrams Challenger 2 can snipe a abrams from 5000km + distance without it even being seen More than double what a abrams can reach ,100% accuracy .

@Masteryoshix @Pyeholio @Defence_Index And despite its age it has these modern crew safety features that the chally 2 lack, has better ammunition, is far less of a logistical mess, far more manoeuvrable and allows for crews to survive critical damage. To say it’s dogshit is to say the chally 2 is worse than dogshit

@spinningrat69 @Pyeholio @Defence_Index The only tanks that get oblterated by $300 fpv drones are the abrams tanks , The ukranians said the abrams tank was useless is modern warfare $25 million for a 50 year old tank that cant take a hit from a fpv (Abrams)

@Masteryoshix @Pyeholio @Defence_Index Lmao no counter argument because you know I’m right the chally two is natos worst modern mbt. Not even just because of its lack in crew safety features but its ammunition and manoeuvrablity are all shit when compared to the Abrams, Leo and Leclerc. 100% turret detach rate too.

@spinningrat69 @Pyeholio @Defence_Index USA/ australia donated 80 M1A1 Abrams tanks and they got destroyed by fpv drones

@BallisticBrix @FalkTG USA got exposed by iran big . All the military bases destroyed , 10 radars that make 10+ years to make destroyed . USA literally have 0 air defence capability in 2026, Nato doesnt need that old 1970s trash technology

@FalkTG The UK has like 4 functional Navy boats. EU armies are non existent While we paid for your defenses and your economies for a century, you all laughed at us for not having "free healthcare." Maybe now, you'll get to see how expensive an effective military really is. ENJOY !!

Europe needs to replace Tomahawk ASAP

@spinningrat69 @Pyeholio @Defence_Index You are delusional 😆 Stick to anime/games mate

@Masteryoshix @Pyeholio @Defence_Index The challenger two has a 100% turret detatch rate and is prone to catastrophic destruction when critically damaged. While mbts like the Abrams and Leo allow the crews to typically survive. Why because these tanks have modern safety systems which is why the chally 3 will have them

@spinningrat69 @Pyeholio @Defence_Index You said "If anything the chally 3 is evidence the chally 2 was so dog shit." Where is the evidence mate ?😆

@Masteryoshix @Pyeholio @Defence_Index The challenger 3 is a tank that isn’t even in use yet so why would I be speaking about it? It is literally them admitting they fucked up and making a design that is like others seen from nato. If anything the chally 3 is evidence the chally 2 was so dog shit.

@spinningrat69 @Pyeholio @Defence_Index 😆You said it had the worst modern safest features, Google says it has the best in the world You got that so wrong 😀

@Masteryoshix @Pyeholio @Defence_Index Enlighten me where the misinfo is? What i said was all true,The chally lacks blast doors and blowout panels and its propellants are stored in bins that can take only light fragmentation. The tank weighs to much it can’t be used effectively for assaults when compared to other mbts

@spinningrat69 @Pyeholio @Defence_Index At least try do some research before you post misinformation 😆

@Masteryoshix @Pyeholio @Defence_Index How dense are you to not understand my reply. I said it lacks MODERN crew safety features. Having armour for a tank isn’t modern dip shit. The chally lacks blowout panels and blast doors. Its charges are stored in bins, that can handle just light frag. Tanks can also be TOO heavy

@JuanEduardo2010 @AlertaMundoNews Nutria (Coypu): Also known as "swamp rats," these large marsh rodents are hunted in some areas of Argentina. Historically, they were harvested for both their fur and their white meat, which is described as delicious and often slow-cooked with wine and herbs. what about this 🤔

@AlertaMundoNews No es furor, es desesperación por comida!!!!!!! La carne de burro es poquísima respecto al consumo promedio por cada Argentino... esa una nota "de hambre". Están romantizando la miseria... Vergüenza deberia dearle a los medios nacionales por esta nota.

🇦🇷 | Medio chileno T13 publica un reportaje “Furor en Argentina por carne de burro”, donde informa que una carnicería vendió más de 500 kg en apenas 48 horas como alternativa ante el aumento de la carne vacuna.

Ya se vendieron 500 KILOS de carne de BURRO y salimos en noticieros extranjeros como noticia furor. Milei nos hizo mierda. Fenómeno Barrial

@spinningrat69 @Pyeholio @Defence_Index Well you just roasted yourself again , Its made with dorchester armour 🤣 "Lacks crew safety features " 🤣 "also weighing a fuck ton" So tanks shit because it weighs a fuck ton ? Dumb fuckwit 😆

@Masteryoshix @Pyeholio @Defence_Index What part of anything I said made no sense? The chally is shit when compared to modern nato mbts. It stands as natos only tank with a 100% turret toss rate and lacks basket modern crew safety features while also weighing a fuck ton. And that’s not even talking about its barrel

@spinningrat69 @Pyeholio @Defence_Index You dont make any sense . You wouldnt know whats good/bad being australian 🤣stick to anime

@Masteryoshix @Pyeholio @Defence_Index You were cooking until you brought up the challenger being “better”. Only reason we haven’t seen the chally destroyed more is because they aren’t being used like other mbts are. Because they can’t be used like the others. The chally is the worst nato mbt by far and it isnt close