AmericasPlumber

You know the real reason why Democrats are calling for Eric Swalwell to drop out of the California governor’s race? They know Republicans could win, with Democrats splitting their votes. How do we know? Democrats aren’t calling for Swalwell to resign from his House seat.

🚨 JUST IN: In a bombshell move that's sending shockwaves across NATO, Spanish PM Pedro Sánchez has arrived in Beijing for a four-day official visit focused on stronger commercial ties with China, with an emphasis on signing an investment agreement and technology cooperation.

Oh, brother...strap in, because this venomous little opportunist just handed us Exhibit A for the defamation suit of the century. Candace Owens doesn’t merely speak; she slithers. With Charlie Kirk six feet under and unable to eviscerate her on the spot, she waits until the dirt is still settling on a man who was ride-or-die for Trump...through every primary brawl, every assassination attempt, every media lynching...to drop this cinematic little fable about Miriam Adelson’s $100 million and Trump allegedly muttering, tie-straightening, “I’ll take the money and fuck her over.” Classic pathology. This is textbook posthumous character assassination by a narcissist who mistakes silence for consent. She knows damn well Kirk isn’t here to call her a liar to her face. She knows the man spent years building a movement that elevated her own platform, and now she’s cashing in on his corpse for clout and clicks. That’s not “telling the truth.” That’s grave-robbing with better lighting and a podcast mic. Legally? Delicious. Defamation per se doesn’t get cleaner than this. She’s accusing a dead political icon of betraying a major donor on a foreign-policy pivot that would’ve required public acts, witnesses, and paper trails...none of which she’s produced beyond “Charlie told me.” Dead men can’t sue, but their estates can. Kirk’s family, Turning Point, the Trump orbit...any of them with standing can drag her into discovery and watch her story evaporate under oath. She’s not protected by opinion; she’s peddling specific, verifiable (or falsifiable) facts about a quid-pro-quo that, if false, is pure libel. And the timing? After Kirk’s assassination? That’s not journalism. That’s psychological sadism dressed as insight. Psychology 101: this is the grifter’s tell. When your relevance is fading, you don’t build...you burn bridges with the dead because they can’t fight back. She’s weaponizing Kirk’s loyalty to Trump to paint Trump himself as cynical, all while pretending she’s the truth-teller. It’s Machiavellian, sure, but sloppy. The kind of move that reveals the soul: a woman who’d trade yesterday’s ally for today’s headline without a flicker of shame. Charlie Kirk was loyal when loyalty cost him everything. Candace? She’s loyal only to the mirror and the algorithm. Fuck her. The lawsuit is coming, the receipts will follow, and the rest of us who actually understood what Charlie stood for will be watching with popcorn and contempt. Rest in peace, Charlie. The snakes are already circling the grave...and one just hissed too loud. 💀⚖️

Utah better get a handle on this stuff