Amos รีทวีตแล้ว
Amos
520 posts
Amos
@MetaWeb_Amos
Serial entrepreneur turned VC @ https://t.co/t1WTXyzSAe Crypto trader (ranked top 3 on Binance at one point) and degen. DYOR. NOT FINANCIAL ADVICE
เข้าร่วม Ocak 2011
397 กำลังติดตาม1.8K ผู้ติดตาม
Amos รีทวีตแล้ว
There's no such thing as a bigger disconnect at this point, than with $NEAR.
Intents going absolutely parabolic. Revenue shooting up.
Price about to break, and then a market-wide correction.
Watch our episode with Illia about $NEAR here:
youtube.com/watch?v=jfjZKQ…
Now, I've mentioned this a few times before.
Before this dip occurred on $NEAR, it provided a massive opportunity to be accumulating this position.
Therefore, I would suggest to be looking at position-building into the entire AI vertical, as that is one of the key verticals in the coming period.
Aside from that, once $BTC has found a bottom, the assets that were moving the fastest prior to the correction are going to be the ones bounces back the fastest.
YouTube
English
Amos รีทวีตแล้ว
Good or bad market day,
NEAR Intents growing anyway.
54% of cross chain market share yesterday.
English
Amos รีทวีตแล้ว
1/ The market is beginning to recognize the current state of @NEARProtocol, with public dashboards showing it as a top-tier L1 for fee generation (~$1.9M in the last 7 days).
This is a strong validation of network traction.
English
Buybacks of NEAR incoming
Alex Shevchenko 🇺🇦@AlexAuroraDev
Total generated fees of NEAR Intents is $5.4M as of today. A thread on this topic.
English
Amos รีทวีตแล้ว
NEAR Intents = The Universal Liquidity Layer
0 to $1B in volume — 305 days
$1B to $2B in volume — 35 days
$2B to $3B in volume — 20 days
$3B to $4B in volume — 8 days
English
@Nearpathfinder @NEARProtocol or just increase the fees taken from intents lol
English
If I understand correctly: NEAR Intents charges 1% of the transferred volume as fees. Of that, 0.001% goes directly to @NearProtocol – and these revenues are intended to finance the announced buyback program.
Calculation:
💎Approximately 87,000 new NEARs are issued daily.
💎At $3/NEAR = $261,000 buyback required per day.
💎With a 0.001% Protocol share, this requires a daily transaction volume of $26.1 billion through $NEAR Intents.
$26.1 billion in volume per day that's ambitious.
For comparison: Solana achieves $5-15 billion on good days.
What do you think? Can we handle the volume?
English
Amos รีทวีตแล้ว
99% of fees from Intents will be used to buy back NEAR from the market
1% to buy back Jambo
Haseeb ＞|＜@hosseeb
Wow. @NEARProtocol intents starting to put up some serious fee numbers.
English
Amos รีทวีตแล้ว
NEAR has successfully completed its halving upgrade on mainnet.
This upgrade reduces the maximum annual inflation rate of NEAR Protocol from 5% to 2.5%, ushering in an era of more sustainable tokenomics and strengthening incentive alignment across the NEAR ecosystem.
English
@KamBenbrik @NEARProtocol Lol you accusation is not factual. If u don't want to support it, you don't have to beauty it up by making some excuses.
English
The situation on @NEARProtocol:
- There was a governance proposal to reduce the inflation rate by 50%
- The proposal didn’t get enough votes from validators and failed because it didn’t reach the threshold
- The NEAR team still decided to implement this change in the next upgrade
- Now, if validators upgrade, they’re forced to accept this change in inflation even though the proposal initially failed due to a lack of votes!!
Governance is broken, @ChorusOne decided not to upgrade to prevent bad behaviors like this from happening.
Chorus One@ChorusOne
NEAR Governance Proposal 🚨 We would like to publicly share our concerns regarding a serious governance issue currently happening on the @NEARProtocol blockchain.
English
@KamBenbrik @NEARProtocol Your accusation is not based on facts. I would urge whoever still staking with chorus one to remove their stake. The fees are too high anyways.
English
Near holders supporting the upgrade please move your stake to the validators who have taken actions!
Evgeny Kuzyakov@ekuzyakov
Here is the results of the mentioned on-chain voting: vote.linearprotocol.org/details It was incredible to see participation of 89 validators and 48.45% of total stake in the voting process, that required to issue a custom on-chain transaction from the pool owners account. The overwhelming majority of 91.76% of stake-weighted validators voted YES for reducing the inflation. Some people argue that not-voting was implicit NO, but that's a bit flawed, since some validators (exchanges, institutions, staking providers) have to stay neutral and abstain. The problem is there were no ABSTAIN vote in the on-chain contract, so they couldn't have express their opinion this way. The voting has ended without reaching the consensus threshold. Currently, the protocol upgrade to 2.9.0 introduced the inflation reduction. Validators have to decide by either upgrading or not, which is a bit problematic, because there is no abstain option again. As a NEAR stake holder who supports the inflation reduction, make sure to move your stake to a staking pool that voted FOR reducing inflation. If you are AGAINST the inflation reduction, move your stake to the pool that voted NO for reducing inflation. The protocol upgrade voting is scheduled to start on October, 28 and will last for 3 weeks. So there is plenty of time to decide.
English
Amos รีทวีตแล้ว
Here is the results of the mentioned on-chain voting:
vote.linearprotocol.org/details
It was incredible to see participation of 89 validators and 48.45% of total stake in the voting process, that required to issue a custom on-chain transaction from the pool owners account.
The overwhelming majority of 91.76% of stake-weighted validators voted YES for reducing the inflation. Some people argue that not-voting was implicit NO, but that's a bit flawed, since some validators (exchanges, institutions, staking providers) have to stay neutral and abstain. The problem is there were no ABSTAIN vote in the on-chain contract, so they couldn't have express their opinion this way.
The voting has ended without reaching the consensus threshold.
Currently, the protocol upgrade to 2.9.0 introduced the inflation reduction. Validators have to decide by either upgrading or not, which is a bit problematic, because there is no abstain option again.
As a NEAR stake holder who supports the inflation reduction, make sure to move your stake to a staking pool that voted FOR reducing inflation. If you are AGAINST the inflation reduction, move your stake to the pool that voted NO for reducing inflation.
The protocol upgrade voting is scheduled to start on October, 28 and will last for 3 weeks. So there is plenty of time to decide.
Chorus One@ChorusOne
NEAR Governance Proposal 🚨 We would like to publicly share our concerns regarding a serious governance issue currently happening on the @NEARProtocol blockchain.
English
Amos รีทวีตแล้ว
Amos รีทวีตแล้ว
NEAR Intents is now the fifth biggest interoperability protocol in crypto
chronear@chronear
NEAR Intents is now the sixth biggest interoperability protocol in crypto
English
Amos รีทวีตแล้ว
$NEAR is accumulating for the entire year of 2025.
That's nearly 9 months of accumulation.
Once it breaks through the resistance of $3.25-3.50 I assume it will be a strong breakout.
English
Almost 5 year since mainnet launch and @NEARProtocol still shipping strong
Haseeb ＞|＜@hosseeb
English
Amos รีทวีตแล้ว
AI meets Crypto at #KBW25. Exploring real impacts and future opportunities ahead.
👥 Speakers:
▪️@MetaWeb_Amos (@MetaWebVC)
▪️@charliekavanz (@nansen_ai )
▪️@sj_baek_ (@hashed_official )
👥Moderator:
Aurélie Boiteux (@nansen_ai )
👉 Save your spot: luma.com/1f4100jx
English
Amos รีทวีตแล้ว
And finally the Investment Panel
The panel of investors covered shifts in crypto×AI investing since 2023, what excites them now, and strategies for founders aiming to bridge crypto-native and broader AI ecosystems.
Featuring:
-Sunny He @sunny_unifAI, Co-founder @unifainetwork
-Nihal Maunder @nihal_maunder, Partner @PanteraCapital
-Amos Zhang @MetaWeb_Amos, Founder of MetaWeb
-Jun Park @iamjunpark, Senior Investor @Hashed
English