FrozenFire
649 posts

FrozenFire
@MetaverseRedef
AAA Game Dev. Web3 Investor. Covering the next wave of innovations powering the intersection of ai and gaming
เข้าร่วม Ekim 2021
886 กำลังติดตาม490 ผู้ติดตาม

Hey #teamshardi
Post your wins and portfolios for everyone to see here!!
(don't show our symbols pls)
English

@ShardiB2 Lol truth, sold highs before trump at open and bought dip end of day 🔥🙌.
Sub is more than picks
English

$CIFR NO BRAKES

Don’t Follow Shardi B If You Hate Money@ShardiB2
$CIFR ready to rip it up again
English
FrozenFire รีทวีตแล้ว

After achieving 100s of millions, this is my #1 lesson I can give you.
Found a vid of me 14 years ago. Broke. Cringe. In my $200 a month bedroom talking about my new "SEO blog."
Why I show this: It’s CRINGE af… BUT it’s why I have wealth that .01% of people do. Here’s why 👇
Imagine seeing this back then as someone who knew me in high school before I did anything.
CRINGE. LOL. Look at this dork who isn’t in college at this age.
When you start ANYTHING, you will be cringe. ALWAYS.
To get to the good stuff, you have to go through the “icky” beginner period. To make MAX progress you have to put yourself out in the world.
The world will then tell you: you are embarrassing… stop.
This is because most peoples SOLE goal in life is protecting their ego and not looking like a failure to others.
In short, they make their main goal avoiding being cringe.
Very few people can put themselves in a position where they appear weak, pathetic, silly—yet keep moving forward.
Those that can… repeatedly… and stay motivated? They take over the world.
Because in order to be Tom Brady, you FIRST must get on the field and throw the ball like a 5-year-old soy girl and be judged by everyone on the sidelines.
Then you analyze your throw and get better day after day, week after week, year after year… till you’re great.
My point, my #1 lesson: Be cringe as fuck and put yourself out there. Let the peanut gallery laugh.
There is NOTHING shameful about wanting to become something greater than you are and trying like hell in public to do so.
Accept the pain of being a clown short term… to avoid being a clown (like those on the sidelines) for your entire life.
<3 Be cringe. Pursue cringe.

English
FrozenFire รีทวีตแล้ว

@SteveUrkelDude Few ideas
- beach day + nearby shops (would recommend manhattan beach or Newport or La Jolla)
- ferry to Catalina island (sightseeing, mini-golf, nature trails, submarine ride, etc)
- solvang ( day trip to danish inspired town)
- underwood farm (animals, rides, season events)
English
FrozenFire รีทวีตแล้ว

The Dual-Income Paradox: When Equality Breeds Inequality
A household, like any economic unit, must reach a market-clearing income, the baseline level required to sustain itself within society’s cost structure. For single-earner households, that clearing level is borne entirely by one person. But when two incomes are pooled, that threshold is normalized across the pair. All else equal, each individual’s required income contribution is effectively halved.
This dual-income structure allows for optimization. One partner can anchor the household with what might be called a “coupon income” a stable, predictable salary designed to reliably meet the household’s funding needs. Think of it as the bond allocation in a portfolio: steady, dependable, sufficient.
The other partner, however, is now freed to pursue what might be called “convexity income.” This is riskier, less certain, but carries the potential for asymmetric payoff. Because the “coupon” side of the household balance sheet is already secured, the family can tolerate the volatility. And in the long run, convexity income tends to have positive expected value: a single breakthrough, promotion, or entrepreneurial success can deliver returns wildly disproportionate to the initial contribution.
Herein lies one of the underappreciated engines of inequality. It is not simply that dual-income households earn more, but that dual-income households can strategically allocate between stability and convexity. This structural advantage compounds over time. The irony, of course, is that the U.S. tax code actually favors single-income households and penalizes dual-income households, amplifying the divide: the very families best positioned to optimize for convexity are also nudged by policy into an even greater advantage.
Look around and you’ll see the pattern: a doctor married to a hedge fund founder. A lawyer married to an actor. A teacher married to a tech entrepreneur. These are not coincidences; they are optimized household outcomes, where one income secures the base and the other tilts for upside.
The paradox is that society wants both gender equality and economic fairness, yet the system pushes households to optimize in ways that widen inequality. Women entering the workforce en masse was supposed to level the playing field, but in practice it often accelerates the dynamic where one partner takes the “coupon income” and the other maximizes “convexity income.” If we are serious about gender equality, we must also rethink how tax policy, workplace structures, and social expectations reward or penalize different household configurations—otherwise equality at the individual level will continue to generate inequality at the household level.
English
FrozenFire รีทวีตแล้ว

🇺🇸 The family of the US president has:
1) Bought $2 billion worth of Bitcoin at prices over $100K
2) Publicly called on the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates
3) Predicted Bitcoin will reach $1 million
4) Taken seats on the boards of Bitcoin treasury companies
5) Stated they want the US to buy Bitcoin
All openly, in public.
We're going much higher.


English






