Mike Rotch

782 posts

Mike Rotch

Mike Rotch

@MikeRotch97906

เข้าร่วม Ocak 2026
12 กำลังติดตาม6 ผู้ติดตาม
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@PPoachersLIVE @iFightForKids People that actually watch this "content" are freaks. "Pred catching" is not about "stopping pdfs" or "protecting kids" it's about going viral/becoming famous punching down on a group that's already disliked. This "catching preds" content needs to die. x.com/cameljockee/st…
Mike Rotch tweet mediaMike Rotch tweet media
𝒌@cameljockee

so now hes saying he uses a D-pic that he took in HIGHSCHOOL to send to predators (unless he was a senior, he’s using his own Child P*rnagraphy).....

English
0
0
0
11
Predator Poachers
Predator Poachers@PPoachersLIVE·
ACTUAL BREAKING NEWS FR 🚨 Alex Rosen (@iFightForKids) has had his account hacked by an online predator. He is not able to access the account because 2FA was set up on it to completely lock it out. As of right now we have no resolution. Since this does pose a huge safety risk (considering a prominent account is in the hands of a less than desirable) - we are asking that X @Support reach out to us immediately and help recover the account Please engage with and share this post and tag members of the x team such as @nikitabier @elonmusk @premium @KettlebellDan until somebody contacts us.
English
391
2.5K
9.6K
1.2M
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@PPoachersLIVE @iFightForKids @nikitabier People that actually watch this "content" are freaks. "Pred catching" is not about "stopping pdfs" or "protecting kids" it's about going viral/becoming famous punching down on a group that's already disliked. This "catching preds" content needs to die. x.com/cameljockee/st…
Mike Rotch tweet mediaMike Rotch tweet media
𝒌@cameljockee

so now hes saying he uses a D-pic that he took in HIGHSCHOOL to send to predators (unless he was a senior, he’s using his own Child P*rnagraphy).....

English
0
0
0
7
Predator Poachers
Predator Poachers@PPoachersLIVE·
⛔️ X Just kicked me out of .@iFightForKids AFTER I regained access to it. I just want access to the account back. .@nikitabier please make this right. It's obviously me trying to login!
English
144
699
3.3K
132.1K
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@FluffWingBirdie @GirlyScouts @TheEmpressTiff @NAllison89 I'd be tired too if I got proven wrong so blatantly. 🤷‍♂️ As I said, just because something in nature primarily falls on women and doesn’t apply equally to men doesn’t mean you have to freak out and turn it into a 50/50 battle by shifting blame onto men too.
English
0
0
0
6
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@GirlyScouts @TheEmpressTiff @NAllison89 Fascinating how when women are confronted with anything in nature that primarily falls on them — rather than applying equally 50/50 with men — they freak out, refuse to accept it, and grasp at anything to shift some blame onto men too. You can't fight nature forever
Mike Rotch tweet media
English
1
0
0
23
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@GirlyScouts @TheEmpressTiff @NAllison89 But they don't. All available science shows us that the main factor in pregnancy success/genetic health is determined by the age of the mother and her eggs. Not the father or his sperm. Why are you so angry about this? I'm not "getting one over" on women by saying this.
English
2
0
0
66
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@GirlyScouts @TheEmpressTiff @NAllison89 Fascinating how when women are confronted with anything in nature that primarily falls on them — rather than applying equally 50/50 with men — they freak out, refuse to accept it, and grasp at anything to shift some blame onto men too. You can't fight nature forever
Mike Rotch tweet media
English
0
0
0
17
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@GirlyScouts @TheEmpressTiff @NAllison89 Highly negligible, you kept going on about IQ and the statistics show only a ~3 point differential (which is completely negligible). I pointed out biology and you guys got super angry. No shame in that, the fertility clinic said women would find this info difficult.
English
2
0
0
47
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@GirlyScouts @TheEmpressTiff @NAllison89 Fascinating how when women are confronted with anything in nature that primarily falls on them — rather than applying equally 50/50 with men — they freak out, refuse to accept it, and grasp at anything to shift some blame onto men too. You can't fight nature forever
Mike Rotch tweet media
English
0
0
0
17
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@GirlyScouts @TheEmpressTiff @NAllison89 But they don't. The medical consensus is that the primary factor in pregnancy success/genetic health is overwhelmingly the quality of the eggs (determined by the age of the mother), not the age of the father/sperm. I don't understand what you're having difficulty with.
English
2
0
0
58
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@GirlyScouts @FluffWingBirdie @Narcomancer20 @susandeath13 @NAllison89 Fascinating how when women are confronted with anything in nature that primarily falls on them — rather than applying equally 50/50 with men — they freak out, refuse to accept it, and grasp at anything to shift some blame onto men too. You can't fight nature forever
Mike Rotch tweet media
English
0
0
0
13
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@GirlyScouts @TheEmpressTiff @NAllison89 Fascinating how when women are confronted with anything in nature that primarily falls on them — rather than applying equally 50/50 with men — they freak out, refuse to accept it, and grasp at anything to shift some blame onto men too. You can't fight nature forever.
Mike Rotch tweet media
English
0
0
0
18
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@GirlyScouts @TheEmpressTiff @NAllison89 But you're not. You're just grasping at straws cause you can't accept that the primary factor falls on the age of the mother, not the father. The overwhelming factor for pregnancy success/genetic health will always be quality of the eggs (determined by age of the mother).
Mike Rotch tweet mediaMike Rotch tweet mediaMike Rotch tweet media
English
2
0
0
60
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@GirlyScouts @TheEmpressTiff @NAllison89 Fascinating how when women are confronted with anything in nature that primarily falls on them — rather than applying equally 50/50 with men — they freak out, refuse to accept it, and grasp at anything to shift some blame onto men too. You can't fight nature forever.
Mike Rotch tweet media
English
1
0
0
30
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@GirlyScouts @TheEmpressTiff @NAllison89 Why do you keep assuming I'm old LMAO. I don't see why it's so hard to accept the scientific consensus that maternal age is the primary factor which all OB-GYNs agree on.
Mike Rotch tweet mediaMike Rotch tweet media
English
1
0
0
28
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@jemimajones68 @Ashketchup1423 @NAllison89 Negligible, since females in their late teens/early 20s have the best quality eggs they will ever produce. That leads to lower birth defects, easier conceptions, healthier pregnancies, etc. You can't get around that, there are risks sure, but 18-23 will always be most optimal.
Mike Rotch tweet media
English
0
0
0
23
Somewhere over the rainbow 🟥
@MikeRotch97906 @Ashketchup1423 @NAllison89 Evidence indicates babies born to mothers aged 18-23, particularly under 20, face higher risks of preterm birth, low birthweight, stillbirth, neonatal mortality, and some congenital issues compared to those born to mothers aged 25-30- grok on the health of the baby .
English
1
0
0
50
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@jemimajones68 @Ashketchup1423 @NAllison89 All pregnancy comes with risk, but that doesn't change that the best ages for a woman to have children is 18-23. You can definitely have them from 24-30, but the most optimal age range dictated by biology and mother nature is 18-23. That is when it's best for her and her kids.
Mike Rotch tweet media
English
0
0
0
11
Somewhere over the rainbow 🟥
@MikeRotch97906 @Ashketchup1423 @NAllison89 Younger mothers, particularly under 25 and especially under 20, are disproportionately represented in eclampsia deaths . Which if 18-23 really was prime wouldn't be the case. 25-35 is safer for the woman. And she is more likely to get pregnant in these years too.
English
1
0
0
39
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@jemimajones68 @Ashketchup1423 @NAllison89 I already said that. Only in low-income nations do complications from pregnancy actually take the mother's life. Also prime fertility window is 18-23. Biological consensus agrees on that. If you're going to have kids that's the time to do it. 25-30 is possible, but 18-23 is best.
English
2
0
0
25
Somewhere over the rainbow 🟥
@MikeRotch97906 @Ashketchup1423 @NAllison89 No . Women and girls with pre eclampsia are far more likley die of it in low income countries. The incidence appears higher in high income although that's because of better maternity care.And teenage girls about twice as likely to develop it than women aged between 25 and 20 are.
English
1
0
0
57
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@LedenUnor @guy_canadian3 @NAllison89 What's putting people at risk is delaying childbirth into your 30s/40s. You're quite literally rolling the dice on your health/kids genetics. You do you but anyone else reading this should know the truth. If a woman wants kids it's best to have all of them by the time she's 25.
English
0
0
0
13
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@jemimajones68 @Ashketchup1423 @NAllison89 That's in low-income nations. Maternal complications are rarely the cause of death in developed parts of the world. Biology will never change on this, the prime fertility window is 18-23. It's possible to have kids 25-30, but if you're going to have them, 18-23 is best.
Mike Rotch tweet mediaMike Rotch tweet media
English
2
0
0
24
Somewhere over the rainbow 🟥
@MikeRotch97906 @Ashketchup1423 @NAllison89 Look at the study I linked. It's age 25 to 30 when statistically a woman is most likely to be pregnant after 6 to 12 months of trying. And aged 18 to 25 her chances of pre eclampsia are at least 58% greater than after the age of 25. More like 100% aged 18.
English
1
0
0
34
Mike Rotch
Mike Rotch@MikeRotch97906·
@TheEmpressTiff @GirlyScouts @NAllison89 This graphic is only true for low-income nations. The prime fertility window for females is 18-23. If you're going to have children, that's when you should do it. If a female wants children, then it's best that all the kids she wants to have are born by the time she's 25.
Mike Rotch tweet mediaMike Rotch tweet media
English
0
0
0
18