Iván A. M.

JUST IN: US housing market reaches most "unaffordable" level in history

Sarah Santaolalla explica porque su ética moral no le dejaría sentarse en un plató de televisión junto a Ferreras. Enorme Sarah Santaolalla.

Ahora los españoles quieren defender Canarias por el tema de Quevedo, pero el resto del año nos insultan llamándonos monos, africanos, no nos tienen en cuenta en nada y se ofenden si les llamamos godos por eso. No mis amores, Canarias no necesita su defensa, DÉJENNOS EN PAZ.

Netanyahu: Seeking to end U.S. military aid within seven years; Israel will become self-reliant

Deportation NATO. A Restore Britain Government would initiate the first steps across Europe and the wider West to establish a collective border security coalition: a kind of Deportation NATO, as it were. Its chief purpose would be to deploy collective leverage – an organised, explicit, and escalatory chain of measures, from visa sanctions to lifetime re-entry bans, that member states apply in concert to secure readmission agreements and operational cooperation. Consider how much tougher the measure would be if we had an international system in place to ensure that such bans apply not only in the case of Britain, but in as many Western countries as possible. The NATO-like principle at work is clear: a lifetime ban from one member state means a lifetime ban from all. There is no reason why the same collective clout cannot also intensify the power of various other penalties like remittance taxes, trade sanctions or visa cancellations. Done once hard enough, it would not need to be deployed twice. If a country persistently refuses to accept its own nationals, the coalition will move through a pre-agreed escalation ladder: (1) naming-and-shaming (2) moving quickly to visa restrictions (3) suspension of non-essential travel (4) trade and tariff measures (5) restrictions on remittances/dividends (6) diplomatic pressure (7) for the most intransigent states, coordinated refusal to admit nationals into coalition territories. The objective is simple: make non-cooperation politically and economically unbearable for the recalcitrant state until it agrees to practical readmission arrangements. Multilateral weight magnifies cost. Sanctions from a single country are easier to absorb, but a unified bloc of economies and travel markets creates systematic and severe pressure. Coordinated restrictions would also close loopholes whereby nationals bypass one state’s measures by moving to another jurisdiction. All delivered alongside the credible and proven threat of action. A ladder published in clear terms reduces negotiation uncertainty and removes the advantage of hoping political fatigue will make sanctions temporary. The use of these levers must be governed by legal authority and parliamentary oversight. The coalition’s designation process must be transparent and evidence-based to withstand diplomatic and legal challenges. Britain is uniquely placed to lead such a coalition. Initial membership would likely consist of nations already aligned on border enforcement, intelligence cooperation, and migration control: the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, France, Germany, Italy, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Greece. Several Central and Eastern European states (notably Poland, Hungary, and the Czech Republic) have already voiced support for tougher deportation frameworks and would likely join. Collectively, this bloc would represent the overwhelming majority of the Western world’s desirable destinations for economic migration, giving it immense leverage over recalcitrant states.

Mélenchon vient de justifier un assassinat. Je n’ai pas les mots. Il vient de justifier un assassinat d’un jeune de 23 ans par ses milices.