EigowaTanoshi

Made this light reflective, inky mushroom inspired hat today ✨ (It's all black in normal lighting)

I had to lmfao

My biggest impact on the internet was drawing this 4 years ago.

okay um... ouch?

la creatura

@BlueqlowGives In what context does this mean? Just because he opposes your opinion doesn't mean you can be a asshole about it especially quoting a post like that? I don't like SharkyLeo's opinions but I'm not going after him for it.

you are a simp who supports ren, no wonder gwamgo hates you

@SharkyLeo_YT Sorry that you had to go through that, Hope you get better 😥

These are very valid points, the redundancies of both parties do lead to a narrative of its own. Make your own opinions on this after reading. Not skimming.

@burergs @Ethan_DOORSWiki I'm quite tired of ppl that say "rapist" read the docs. In no point was rapist ever mentioned. Rapist refers to unconsented penile penetration. Sexual assault is Unconsented sexual touch. Both sides are unreliable, as none have any solid evidence. Make your own opinions

@Ethan_DOORSWiki Your 13. Gay, taken, selfshipping with groundskeeper, said the n word many times, reposting suggestive furry shit, supporting a rapist, and so much more

Updated DNI list, I'll let people that support Ren but don't do anything interact with me.

@ItzzD0NUT WTF??? Good job I'm happy for you

I won!!!!

@Yeetus0fetus @perkaholicc_ - Post note I was not wearing my glasses and read it as another screenshot .3.

I'm Sorry to say this guys but this is the first person I had to actually block, they couldn't bring anything to the table and were spinning in circles, after I made it clear I wasn't willing to talk to them again she came back and texted. #pressure

@tallcowyt Both have mental disabilities, The text shared between them in both documentaries are vague consent. The moment experienced around "consent" was different for both sides. No solid evidence. Its a mix up of trust me for both of them till one slips.

@tallcowyt I've cross examined both docs, I try to be understanding of everyone's opinions and why they view it that way. Only countering if I have the proper materials to do so. Otherwise this entire situation is gray. No evidence other than the hickeys -

So after comparing both documents, I think I’ve come to a conclusion. And I don’t think many people will like what I have to say. Disclaimer: Everything mentioned here is alleged, this does not mean it’s true or happened, nor am I saying that. I am not a lawyer, nor am I qualified to make a decision, so please do not count on what I’m saying as facts and do your own research. What Zeal’s document is claiming is that there was some sort of active participation and positive engagement from Ren, which he interpreted as consent to having sex. They clearly had a loving relationship together with feelings for each other, and in Zeal’s eyes, he thinks he did not SA Ren because he genuinely thought she did consent. However, Ren didn’t. She was clearly influenced by distress and wasn’t a fully free or enthusiastic agreement, which was clear to Zeal as it matched his account from his document. The meaning of consent is NOT the absence of a no, it is an active and clear “yes”, which was not present according to Ren’s testimony. Zeal barely even mentions anything to do with a first sexual encounter and only talks about the kiss, this is where it gets really difficult as both of their accounts about the two sexual encounters just don’t fucking match up at all. And there’s no way to tell from that alone who’s in the right and who’s in the wrong. However, I think I’ve just figured out who might be. Zeal described that during RDC, according to him he found out Ren had told others about their encounters, without providing any sort of evidence, not even like a screenshot of anything, and he ended up cutting off with Ren. This is really strange as they clearly had a loving relationship with each other and this also matches Ren’s document where she claimed Zeal would repeatedly cut off and reconnect contact with her. This gives me a huge incentive to trust Ren over Zeal, however I still don’t know for sure. Was Zeal completely in the wrong? I have no fucking clue. The way he talks about the encounters in his document makes it seem like he clearly didn’t mean any harm and I’m just so conflicted honestly. I hope this tweet helped some others think about it at the very least

@tallcowyt This means no intercourse was made without consent due to her claim, But there was unconsented sexual physical touch.