NameHashLabs.eth
422 posts

NameHashLabs.eth
@NamehashLabs
Dedicated to helping ENS grow.



Etherscan reports that Ethereum address poisoning has become industrialized. Driven by lower costs post-Fusaka upgrade (Dec 3), USDT dust transfers surged 612%. Historical data (July 2022–June 2024) reveals ~17 million attempts and over $79.3M in losses. Attackers leverage automated lookalike addresses and dust/zero-value transfers to pollute transaction histories. Despite a marginal 0.01% success rate, the massive scale of these operations ensures high profitability. x.com/etherscan/stat…

Agent identities is going to be a super fun and hard problem for software in the coming years. Most agentic systems today assume that the agent can do everything the user can do, and just operate as an extension of that user. This has worked well and is how most auth has worked for cloud software, and it has made integrations super easy over time. But then comes along systems like Openclaw, and suddenly we get a new view into what becomes possible with agents that can operate on their own. And when you have many of them running in parallel. You start to work with them like a colleague, not just as an extension of what you do. But of course this now introduces an all new complexity than the traditional approach. What if you want an agent to access only a small subset of your data? What if you want an agent to have its own sandbox to operate in without any risk of a blast radius if it goes off the rails? What if you want to create an agent that can work with others, without you seeing everything it’s doing? For all of these cases, agents will start to need their own identities inside of platforms. To do this, we likely will need new mental models for how we delegate controls and access to them, how you handle authentication, who gets to manage them in an organization and so on. Lots to figure out in this space right now.


A quick update on ENSv2: we have made the decision to deploy ENSv2 exclusively on Ethereum L1 and to cease development of Namechain. To be clear, ENSv2 will still ship. The only thing that’s changed is that instead of deploying ENSv2 on our own L2 stack, it will be deployed on L1. It is important to note that ENSv2 is ultimately an upgrade to ENS as it exists today — it’s still ENS! Regardless of where it ultimately gets deployed, it does not fundamentally change ENS the protocol nor does it change any part of our mission and ultimate goal of building the identity layer on Ethereum. The design for ENSv2 was always intended to work fully as designed, whether deployed on L1 or L2. Our product roadmap does not change. We have detailed progress on the ENSv2 Hub to show what exactly v2 will mean for you, and what the team has been building: giving each name its own registry (making your .eth names more powerful and customizable to your own rules!), building two brand new apps from the ground up (both deployed to testnet this week), and much more. I am so excited for this release (soon!) and think it will completely change the way you interact with your own ENS names. The timing of this decision coincides with a broader discussion about the role of L2s in Ethereum. I continue to believe that L2s play a vital role in extending the value of the world computer that is Ethereum, and ENS will continue to support as many chains as possible. In fact, very soon anyone will be able to register a .eth name regardless of which EVM chain they are on — meaning that even if your assets live on Optimism or Arbitrum, it’s a one-click process (no bridge, no gas tokens). We also continue to believe in a multi-chain world beyond EVM chains (a reminder that ENS has and always will support your addresses across major chains like Solana, Bitcoin, and more). We have published the detailed rationale for the decision to stay on L1 on our blog, and I encourage you to read it (in the QT here!) The .eth stays on 🫡

Another day, another alpha launch. The ENS Explorer Alpha is now live on Sepolia. This is a new, comprehensive tool and the primary source of truth for ENS, built for builders, power users, and anyone who needs deep visibility into the protocol. Try it → explorer.ens.dev

So @LiquityProtocol V2 has made its immutable Mainnet borrowing protocol easier to verify: @ensdomains names for every core contract, powered by @enscribe_ and supported by @ens_dao contract naming season. Each contract now has a human-readable, verifiable identity, improving clarity across audits, integrations, and tooling. 👇

Received an notification of having received ether on an address of mine (real ether, albeit very little). Went on to check and it was trying to mimic another address of mine (!) and it had cloned 12 characters! 4 in the beginning and 8 (!) in the end! Dedicated phishing attack!

They argued that writing code is a crime. They compared privacy tools to money laundering. But we know the truth: Privacy is a human right. Math is not a crime. The fight for my freedom - and for the future of open-source software - is at a critical moment. I need your voice to show the world that this community stands together. Please, take 5 minutes to write a letter of support. Your words are the most powerful tool we have left. freeromanstorm.com/write-letter The fight is not over yet.

Now that ZKEVMs are at alpha stage (production-quality performance, remaining work is safety) and PeerDAS is live on mainnet, it's time to talk more about what this combination means for Ethereum. These are not minor improvements; they are shifting Ethereum into being a fundamentally new and more powerful kind of decentralized network. To see why, let's look at the two major types of p2p network so far: BitTorrent (2000): huge total bandwidth, highly decentralized, no consensus Bitcoin (2009): highly decentralized, consensus, but low bandwidth - because it’s not “distributed” in the sense of work being split up, it’s *replicated* Now, Ethereum with PeerDAS (2025) and ZK-EVMs (expect small portions of the network using it in 2026), we get: decentralized, consensus and high bandwidth The trilemma has been solved - not on paper, but with live running code, of which one half (data availability sampling) is *on mainnet today*, and the other half (ZK-EVMs) is *production-quality on performance today* - safety is what remains. This was a 10-year journey (see the first commit of my original post on DAS here: github.com/ethereum/resea… , and ZK-EVM attempts started in ~2020), but it's finally here. Over the next ~4 years, expect to see the full extent of this vision roll out: * In 2026, large non-ZKEVM-dependent gas limit increases due to BALs and ePBS, and we'll see the first opportunities to run a ZKEVM node * In 2026-28, gas repricings, changes to state structure, exec payload going into blobs, and other adjustments to make higher gas limits safe * In 2027-30, large further gas limit increases, as ZKEVM becomes the primary way to validate blocks on the network A third piece of this is distributed block building. A long-term ideal holy grail is to get to a future where the full block is *never* constituted in one single place. This will not be necessary for a long time, but IMO it is worth striving for us at least have the capability to do that. Even before that point, we want the meaningful authority in block building to be as distributed as possible. This can be done either in-protocol (eg. maybe we figure out how to expand FOCIL to make it a primary channel for txs), or out-of-protocol with distributed builder marketplaces. This reduces risk of centralized interference with real-time transaction inclusion, AND it creates a better environment for geographical fairness. Onward.



