Nobody Jones

“Fifteen years after Tupac Shakur’s murder, the FBI has released documents showing that the rapper received death threats from the Jewish Defense League as part of an extortion scheme.” forward.com/schmooze/13707… “Files show FBI suspected JDL of extorting Tupac” jpost.com/jewish-world/j… Haaretz: “FBI files on Tupac Shakur murder show he received death threats from Jewish gang” #selection-1753.1-1756.0" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">archive.ph/s1a7J#selectio… and: @Farz_Zaad comments -- "And after the Tupac and Biggie shootings, Diddy suddenly became rich and famous and ended up having a similar operation to Epstein. 🙃"

@RealLTCRicBosi Hypothesis time; if humans invented God's to explain our chaos, then why wouldn't we invent E.T.'s to explain modern chaos? But as Sagan said... It's magical thinking to conclude we are the "only" ones.

Media Blackout: Islam’s Sexual Enslavement of White Women In 2018, leftists and their media lost their minds after Germany's only conservative political party, the Alternative for Germany (AfD), used the following painting in its election campaign to illustrate one of the many reasons it was against immigration (predominately 3rd world Muslims). Painted in France in 1866 and titled “Slave Market,” the painting was described as “show[ing] a black, apparently Muslim slave trader displaying a naked young woman with much lighter skin to a group of men for examination,” probably in North Africa. The Alternative for Germany party (AfD) put up several posters of this painting with the slogan, “So that Europe won’t become Eurabia.”  Many on both sides of the Atlantic were “triggered” by this usage; even the American museum where the original painting is housed sent AfD a letter “insisting that they cease and desist in using this painting” (even though it is in the public domain). Objectively speaking, the “Slave Market” painting in question portrays a reality that has played out countless times over the centuries: African, Asiatic, and Middle Eastern Muslims have long targeted European women—so much so as to have enslaved millions of them over the centuries. As it happens, there is something else—another medium besides writing—that documents this reality: countless more paintings than the one in question concerning the abduction, trafficking, and sexual enslavement of European women; altogether they further underscore the ubiquity and notoriety of this phenomenon. Indeed, this was such a well-known theme that many nineteenth and early twentieth century artists and painters specialized in it, often based on their own eye-witness accounts. (As one art gallery puts it, “Many … of the most important painters did travel [to the Muslim world] themselves, and what they painted was based on the sketches they had made while they were there…) Below are just 20 such paintings (there are many more).

Today I had the honor of being a guest on the The Adam Carolla Show to discuss my new book Made in America, Communist China, and Communism in America especially those Communist Democrat mayors who are running our great cities into the ground while promising free programs and govt handouts. What’s more, I even got the chance to curse on air for the first time—saying that the voters who put those Communists in charge will eventually find out they’ll get sh*t. #AmericaIsGoodUS

James O’Keefe says if arrests don’t come in 2026, he’ll start investigating the PROSECUTORS THEMSELVES. 2026 will be the year of independent journalism takeover. What's your response to this......??👀 MAKE THIS GO VIRAL ON 𝕏. LET’S GO 👏

🇺🇸🕵️‍♂️🚨 The Silence Around the Shots: Joe Kent, Charlie Kirk, and the Foreign Shadow the FBI Wouldn’t Chase It's amazing how many so-called MAGA/America First 'patriots' that demanded transparency and pushed back on the censoring or throttling of any other narratives or pushback in the past, yet for the Charlie Kirk ass@ss1nation, they happily accept the legacy media and the FBI's explanation. "Just leave it alone." "Don't go there." "That's going to divide MAGA!", "It's just too hot right now." "Let it play out, bro." I knew Charlie. FACTS: Charlie was 💯 growing leery of Benjamin Netanyahu and Jewish donors, who he felt were pressuring him and Turning Point, even micromanaging his guests. There are even audio recordings of the threats from Turning Point's top donor. The media and even Turning Point misrepresented Charlie's friendship with Candice Owens. Why? Charlie Kirk and President Trump discussed Iran. Charlie was against starting a war with Iran. Charlie feared for his life. Charlie felt the radical transgender community was a serious threat to his safety. When conservative activist Charlie Kirk was gunned down on September 10th, 2025, during a campus event at Utah Valley University, the storyline appeared straightforward. A lone shooter, Tyler Robinson, was arrested, charged with aggravated murder, and quickly confessed in a note and text to his trans-identified partner. The media and federal authorities described the crime as tragic yet banal — another isolated act of gun violence in a polarized nation. But behind the scenes, a very different picture was forming, one that reached into Washington’s foreign policy struggles, the FBI’s control of intelligence, and the deep fractures inside the Trump administration. The first cracks in the official narrative came from Joe Kent, then the Director of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) — one of the most senior counterintelligence positions in the U.S. government. Kent claimed that soon after Robinson’s arrest, his agency uncovered leads suggesting a possible foreign nexus to the shooting. His analysts wanted to determine whether Kirk’s outspoken opposition to escalation in Iran — and his criticism of Israeli pressure on U.S. foreign policy — might have made him a target of foreign-linked actors. But according to Kent, the investigation never got that far. Kent says the FBI abruptly instructed the NCTC to halt all foreign-trace inquiries, seized the file, and transferred full control of the case to Utah state authorities — effectively sealing off national intelligence participation. His analysts were not only denied access to the crime scene but also blocked from obtaining data requests and inter-agency files. Whenever Kent’s team tried to reopen lines of inquiry, their requests “died on the vine.” That is the bureaucratic term for suffocation by silence. This was not a low-level misunderstanding. Kent says there were White House and DOJ meetings about his persistence. Senior officials — including national security advisor Kash Patel, Vice President J.D. Vance, and DNI Tulsi Gabbard — allegedly discussed his behavior, warning that continuing such a probe could politically damage the administration and complicate the prosecution of Tyler Robinson. Kent, a decorated combat veteran and no stranger to power games, saw this as a defining moment: the point where justice and statecraft diverged. The timing couldn’t have been worse. President Donald Trump’s renewed conflict with Iran had triggered the largest factional rift inside his movement since 2016. Figures such as Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, and Joe Kent opposed military intervention, warning that Israel’s influence on U.S. foreign policy had gone unchecked. Kirk — a personal friend of Trump who reportedly told Kent, “Keep us out of war with Iran” just months before his death — had become perhaps the loudest anti-war voice within Trump’s inner circle. To men like Kent, the possibility that his killing might be more than random was worth spending a few weeks investigating. To others, that line of inquiry was radioactive. After resisting internal pressure, Joe Kent resigned from his position in early 2026, citing moral opposition to the Iran war and institutional obstruction of truth. He did not stay silent for long. Within days, he sat down for lengthy interviews with Tucker Carlson and Megyn Kelly, publicly alleging that the FBI “blocked” his investigation into possible foreign involvement. His revelation ignited a political firestorm. In successive interviews and reports from outlets like Newsweek, The New American, and The New York Sun, Kent repeated the same refrain: there were leads worth pursuing, and we were prevented from following them. He tread carefully — not directly accusing Israel or any foreign government — but he made it clear where his suspicions leaned. According to Kent, Kirk had been “under pressure from numerous pro-Israel donors” before his death and had been advocating a noninterventionist approach. He stopped short of alleging a conspiracy, but the line between suspicion and implication was almost nonexistent. Meanwhile, inside official Washington, Kent’s candor earned him an FBI leak investigation of his own. He knew it would, and said publicly, “If it gets us to the truth, so be it.” Journalist Michael Shellenberger, writing for Public, exposed details that added gravity to Kent’s statements. Shellenberger confirmed that Kent had warned internally he might be called as a witness, knew that speaking out might assist Robinson’s defense, and did it anyway. For Kent, the matter was clear: the truth about Kirk’s death — whatever it was — outweighed the optics of aiding the accused. “If it gets us to the truth,” he said, “that’s the risk I’m taking.” No one inside the FBI or DOJ has publicly refuted the essence of his claims; they’ve simply refused comment. The core accusation is not that Tyler Robinson didn’t shoot Charlie Kirk, but that he may not have acted alone — or worse, that someone else wanted the story contained before uncomfortable connections surfaced. Kent and other insiders pointed to early social media posts predicting Kirk’s murder before it occurred, a telltale sign of coordination or foreknowledge. Why would the bureau shut down precisely the kind of cross-agency coordination it was built to handle? In the aftermath, the divide in public perception has sharpened. Supporters of Kent argue he became a scapegoat for trying to enforce transparency in a system allergic to it. Establishment voices, from The New York Times to administration spokespeople, claim he overstepped his bounds and “risked politicizing a murder trial.” Yet both narratives confirm the same underlying fact — the probe was blocked. The difference is in whether you think that was good policing or conscious suppression. Kent’s case symbolizes a broader pathology in American governance: the vertical integration of secrecy. When information threatens institutional interests or allied nations, it migrates from “open investigation” to “classified matter” faster than any investigator can blink. From the Kennedy assassination to the modern "Russiagate" fiasco, this recurring choreography — suppress, compartmentalize, deny — creates permanent suspicion. Whether or not those suspicions are justified becomes secondary; the mere act of suppression breeds public distrust. Charlie Kirk’s death thus hangs suspended between two competing realities. In one, the official story: a deranged gunman acted alone, justice will run its course, and there is no greater mystery. In the other, the shadow narrative: a political insider silenced just as his anti-war influence reached the White House, buried under layers of bureaucratic obstruction justified as “procedure.” Either way, the consequences are the same — another wound to America’s confidence that truth and power ever coincide. Joe Kent, for his part, continues to insist that his purpose isn’t to assign blame but to force open a door that should never have been locked. In the end, his role — soldier turned intelligence chief turned whistleblower — resembles the archetype of every truth-seeker who learns the price of integrity in an empire that worships secrecy. "We were prevented from investigating further," he said. That statement alone, accurate or not, indicts the entire system. And that’s the heart of the story: the murder may be solved — but the truth remains redacted.

@MaxBlumenthal @barnes_law Now do Polosi...

The Trump corruption cartel makes Hunter Biden look like Ralph Nader

The same people demanding that you acknowledge “Israel’s right to exist” have also defended the systematic annihilation of Palestine, Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Libya, and Iran as well as the demographic genocide against Europe. Israel is apparently the only nation that can exist.

Wars suck!

@Ezekle1 @MattWallace888 North Korea doesn't manufacture anything of real value so they steal what they can. United States outsources all their manufacturing to China. We are North Korea of America.

@MattWallace888 North Korea owes Sweden $330 million for 1,000 stolen Volvos and every 6 months Sweden sends them reminders.

In the 1980s, North Korea pulled off a covert operation to snag around 87 US-made MD 500 helicopters. They used dummy firms and overseas middlemen who pretended the choppers were headed to European clients. In reality, the aircraft were rerouted into North Korea, aboard Soviet freighters and using other techniques. This sparked a huge uproar when it came to light. Once in their hands, the North Koreans tricked out a bunch of them for combat, fitting them with gear like anti-tank rockets. They then paraded them around on national TV, showing off their new purchases.

This is the most important video I’ve posted since the start of the Iran War. The entire world is about to change over the next 48 hours. Please share this with your friends and family in America.

All the lunatic war pushers like Mark Levin, Ben Shapiro and other "influencers," propagandists and podcasters, should be held accountable for the global mass famine that's coming. They pushed for war, and now they got uncontrollable global destruction. Easily MILLIONS will starve because of what has been set into motion already. Will these warmongering lunatics ever apologize? Never. They will blame you for opposing their wars.

Today is a good day to stop kissing walls located in "Other" countries! We'll need our own "USA" wall that all politicians are required to kiss!

📰 Inside the Fallout: Joe Kent’s Resignation Blows Open a War Within Trump’s Inner Circle The sudden resignation of Joe Kent, Director of the National Counterterrorism Center, has detonated into one of the most serious power struggles yet inside the Trump administration. Officially, Kent quit in protest of what he called an “unnecessary war” with Iran, declaring that “Israel pressured the U.S. into a conflict that serves no benefit to the American people.” But the establishment quickly struck back—accusing the decorated Green Beret and Gold Star husband of being a “known leaker” who was excluded from classified briefings months ago. Corporate media—from CNN to the Associated Press—amplified that storyline, painting Kent as a compromised figure ousted in disgrace rather than a man of conscience. The timing, however, speaks volumes. Kent posted his resignation letter on X hours before the administration could announce his removal, ensuring his narrative went public first. Critics inside the intelligence community called it a “self‑righteous publicity stunt,” while his supporters saw it as a desperate attempt to warn Americans that the Iran war is being driven by deception and foreign influence. Independent outlets quickly rallied behind Kent, pointing to familiar patterns—the silencing of dissenters before or during every U.S. foreign intervention. Labeling him a “leaker” conveniently destroys his credibility without having to confront his central claim: that Israel and its powerful lobby shaped the intelligence used to justify military escalation. Transparency could end the debate instantly—one declassified threat assessment would prove the administration right or wrong—but none has been released. Predictably, those calling for openness have instead been branded as dangerous or antisemitic, a tactic that shuts down discussion by design. Meanwhile, reports from inside Washington paint a broader picture of internal warfare. Tulsi Gabbard, the Director of National Intelligence, has remained largely silent. Vice President JD Vance—who met with Kent days before the resignation—is keeping his distance. And the MAGA coalition itself is fracturing over foreign policy: traditional nationalist voices who supported Trump’s first term “no new wars” stance now accuse him of betraying it under pressure from neoconservative operatives and donors. Fueling the fire, commentators like myself argue that Kent’s resignation wasn’t conscience but camouflage—an effort to save face before being officially terminated. His Substack column, echoed by Fox News insiders, insists Kent was already a liability and manipulated the press to cast himself as a whistleblower. Yet there is no evidence of leaks, relying on anonymous officials—ironically, the same machinery that thrives on secrecy. For transparency advocates, that irony is the giveaway: when bureaucracy fears exposure, it calls exposure treason. In truth, Kent’s departure reveals a government still ruled by internal rivalries and opaque allegiances. It marks the first visible crack in Trump’s alliance with RFK Jr. and Gabbard, a coalition that once promised restraint abroad but now appears consumed by competing loyalties at home. Whether Kent was a hero speaking truth or a liability covering his tracks almost doesn’t matter—the reaction tells the story. The intelligence establishment moved overnight to erase him from legitimacy, just as it has done to every figure who questions its authority. The moral is ancient and unchanged: the louder Washington accuses someone of “leaking,” the more likely that person revealed something the public was never meant to see. The real scandal is not Joe Kent’s defiance but the system’s reflexive instinct to bury dissent under the label of disloyalty. Until Americans see the intelligence reports that justified the war, the nation will keep guessing which side is telling the truth—and which is merely managing the narrative.

I know this may come as news to some of you, but if Lindsey Graham and Mark Levin are excited about something, it's not something you should align yourself with. It's like buying Jim Cramer recommended stocks.

@WayneWaldropW @dbongino @NicholosPoma I came here to say exactly this!

So true. It was a miscalculation for Netanyahu to call for a stand down order. He thought October 7th would create a holocaust type situation where Israel would sway public opinion. Instead it woke everyone up to how evil the Israeli government really is. Glad you are bringing attention to this, Dan!

October 7th was the most profound miscalculation in the history of savagery.

@LauraLoomer How ironic 😏 Trump left MAGA, Tucker is literally MAGA for criticism of Israel and this war.

*chefs kiss* You love to see it.

@lycheeinthesky @100_alpha No government should seek to eliminate any countries or people or religion!

@NobodyJones72 @100_alpha I am not in favor of Israel controlling governments either, but what other alternatives are there to get rid of the Islamic Republic?

Political commentator #ShahidBolsen lists the potential catastrophic consequences if a #ceasefire is not agreed with #Iran. Be Serious- You're not ready to die for the #ZIonist cause!