K

5.7K posts

K banner
K

K

@Panopticon_KAS

Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it.

Corrinth, Kaitain เข้าร่วม Aralık 2021
283 กำลังติดตาม259 ผู้ติดตาม
K รีทวีตแล้ว
Rory Johnston
Rory Johnston@Rory_Johnston·
Let’s see how many tankers cross the Strait of Hormuz tomorrow. Literally everything else is noise.
English
31
65
761
21K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
De La Rosa
De La Rosa@Tejanobrown·
The sudden 14% drop in WTI is a good example of why E&Ps weren’t moving in rigs to the Permian when prices skyrocketed.
English
20
16
347
16.6K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
Hunter📈🌈📊
Hunter📈🌈📊@StatisticUrban·
Sometimes I think "baking bread sounds cool, it'd be nice to have fresh bread." But then I remember that, in exchange for small sum of money, I can buy bread from someone who liked making bread so much they decided to dedicate their career to it. And so I visit the local bakery.
English
14
16
406
10.8K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
Alec Stapp
Alec Stapp@AlecStapp·
Mythos also highlights why it’s insane that we’re allowing NVIDIA to sell chips to China. US labs need all the chips they can get and our compute advantage has been the main thing keeping us in the lead on AI. Why on earth would we voluntarily hand that over to China?
Alec Stapp tweet media
Adam Ozimek@ModeledBehavior

As you read about Anthropic's Mythos capabilities to find critical security weaknesses, consider what if a Chinese AI company had gotten here first. There is a real race underway, and its in our interest I believe for U.S. companies to win.

English
12
31
214
32.2K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
Derek Thompson
Derek Thompson@DKThomp·
Bibi has been fruitlessly begging US admins to bomb Iran and unleash the animal spirits of regime change for decades, like some shitty startup striking out with traditional VCs, over and over again — and like the savvy CEO of a shitty startup idea, he finally found a dumb-money septuagenarian family office to fork over a huge check. Genuinely embarrassing shit.
English
38
198
2K
107.2K
K
K@Panopticon_KAS·
This reads like an attempt to save face. I doubt it’s the entire story.
Drop Site@DropSiteNews

💢📰 REPORT | New reporting from NYT reveals how Trump decided to go to war with Iran — after a closed-door Israeli pitch and despite deep internal divisions inside his own team. At a secret Feb. 11 Situation Room meeting, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu presented a four-part pitch for regime change, including a video montage of potential replacement leaders such as Reza Pahlavi. JD Vance was absent, stuck in Azerbaijan. Appearing alongside Mossad chief David Barnea and military officials, Netanyahu argued: Iran’s ballistic missile program could be destroyed in weeks. The regime would be too weak to close the Strait of Hormuz. Street protests — fomented with Mossad help — could trigger an uprising. Kurdish fighters from Iraq could open a ground front in the northwest. Trump’s response: “Sounds good to me.” Trump’s response: “Sounds good to me.” The next day, U.S. intelligence pushed back sharply. CIA Director John Ratcliffe called the regime-change scenario “farcical,” with Secretary of State Marco Rubio adding: “In other words, it’s bullshit.” Gen. Dan Caine told the president: “This is, in my experience, standard operating procedure for the Israelis. They oversell, and their plans are not always well-developed.” Trump dismissed regime change as “their problem” — but remained focused on targeting Iran’s leadership and military. By Feb. 26, in a final Situation Room meeting, opposition inside the room was clear but fractured. Vice President JD Vance warned the war could spiral and drain U.S. resources, but ultimately said: “You know I think this is a bad idea… but I’ll support you.” Rubio said regime change was unrealistic, but destroying Iran’s missile program was achievable. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth was the biggest proponent of war and backed immediate action. Military leadership outlined risks, including depleted munitions and the threat to Hormuz, but all stopped short of opposing the plan. Key officials responsible for managing the fallout, like the Treasury Secretary, and DNI Gabbard were notably absent. Trump went around the table asking advisors their view, then made the call: “I think we need to do it.” The strikes began two days later.

English
0
0
0
12
K รีทวีตแล้ว
Lakshya Jain
Lakshya Jain@lxeagle17·
An insane amount of debate lately on whether Dems should go on Hasan/Joe Rogan, make more TikToks, run "hotter candidates" etc. In many ways, it is revealing of what the problem actually is: when nobody wants to change the message, they obsess over who the messenger should be.
English
70
234
2.3K
120.3K
Matthew Yglesias
Matthew Yglesias@mattyglesias·
The internet and other digital technologies have made the media landscape much more competitive and much more efficient at delivering what problem want — negativity, extreme identity politics, and systematic overstatements of everything.
English
2
5
68
10.6K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
Christopher Hale
Christopher Hale@ChristopherHale·
Erickson is okay with Trump threatening to blow up a country of 93 million children of God, because the Biden White House tweeted about the Trans Day of Visibility on Easter two years ago. This man holds up the Bible in one hand and denigrates everything it stands for in the other.
English
23
153
3.4K
41.5K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
Evan A. Feigenbaum
Evan A. Feigenbaum@EvanFeigenbaum·
As the United States wages war with Iran, much of Washington has been consumed with a geopolitical debate about what it will mean for America’s strategic competition with China. But this abstract debate belies the harsh realities now facing governments, firms, and people across Asia—the very region that Washington’s strategic class views as the cockpit of competition with Beijing. As I write today in this short essay for @CarnegieEndow the war threatens budgets, welfare programs, and ordinary livelihoods in Asia, a deeper and potentially existential set of challenges that seem sure to influence perceptions of whether and how American goals and interests intersect in the real world with the region’s priorities and its people’s daily realities. And we cannot just talk about U.S. strategy, posture, and especially staying power in the region as if these choices won’t affect perceptions and outcomes, and thus endure even after the bombs stop falling. The United States ignores the region’s lived experience—and the tough political and social trade-offs the war has produced—at its peril. carnegieendowment.org/emissary/2026/…
English
5
44
83
31.8K
K
K@Panopticon_KAS·
@bayeslord What if the situation consumes the man?
English
1
0
1
46
bayes
bayes@bayeslord·
Men are simply wired to find situations worth monitoring, if they can’t find one they will invent one, and so history turns
English
6
5
85
2.5K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
nazzo
nazzo@nazzobetweeting·
new york feels (and is!) so safe i actually find it so comical when people drone on about it being unsafe. like im sorry but have you even been here. you can walk around manhattan alone at 4 am with no issues lmao
Swann Marcus@SwannMarcus89

New York is such a funny city because it’s currently the single safest major city in America on a per capita basis and literally everyone pretends it’s violent for political reasons

English
96
270
6.8K
404.8K
K
K@Panopticon_KAS·
@Noahpinion I liked Vandermeer's "Borne" and Bacigalupi's "Windup Girl" perennially lives in my head. A bioterrorist pharma co is quite something.
English
1
0
1
88
Noah Smith 🐇🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼
Bio- and neuro-themed sci-fi are the only kinds that really make sense to read anymore (as opposed to just reading the news), but most bio- and neuro-themed sci-fi is boring.
English
9
1
38
10.7K
K รีทวีตแล้ว
Joe
Joe@JoePostingg·
Unemployment peaked at 10% in 2009 and didn't drop below 4% until 2018
wallstreetluigi@wallstreetluigi

@JoePostingg the great recession wasnt all that bad, it lasted only about 1 year then people got crazy lazy collecting UE

English
11
142
3.3K
67.3K