Patrick Capps

322 posts

Patrick Capps banner
Patrick Capps

Patrick Capps

@Pcapps05

เข้าร่วม Ekim 2021
33 กำลังติดตาม38 ผู้ติดตาม
Patrick Capps
Patrick Capps@Pcapps05·
and what a fine example of a woman however it’s apples and oranges because the difference between the two examples of Yahshua was almost nothing , you could say the difference between them were skin deep but the difference between the two individuals above well let’s just say it goes deeper than just skin.
English
0
0
1
2K
Arthur Fucksake
Arthur Fucksake@AFucksake69·
@AzPetrich Just a reminder women look like the photo on the left, not the photo on the right. What’s your point?
Arthur Fucksake tweet mediaArthur Fucksake tweet media
English
202
153
10.3K
157.6K
Patrick Capps
Patrick Capps@Pcapps05·
@AzPetrich absolutely true. the One who died for and because of us is described in the scripture as a black individual and i don’t know what that fact has to do with anything.
English
0
0
0
604
Patrick Capps
Patrick Capps@Pcapps05·
WOW seeing all these replies! very telling of the nature of humans it is sad to see it. i hope that the ones who jumped all over you are ashamed of themselves, apologize and learn from it but i wouldn’t hold my breath because unfortunately i’ve observed that that is not human nature.
English
0
0
0
3
Ashley (TeamTrump47)
Ashley (TeamTrump47)@TeamTrump47·
❌I can’t believe I supported Trump❌ Today I deeply REGRET it and almost wish I had voted for Kamala Harris instead. 🗳️ She would have been amazing at: • Keeping inflation low instead of the record highs we saw • Securing the border instead of record crossings and chaos • Avoiding disastrous withdrawals that left Americans behind and emboldened enemies • Preventing wars from breaking out across multiple regions • Maintaining strong energy independence instead of begging other countries for oil • And delivering steady, competent leadership the entire country could trust I’m so sorry, America. I see the light now. APRIL FOOLS! 😂🇺🇸 Trump 2024 — peace through strength is working!
Ashley (TeamTrump47) tweet media
English
500
171
673
33.5K
Patrick Capps
Patrick Capps@Pcapps05·
@Maga4liberty i seriously doubt she would understand my response anyway so i’d just say have a nice day then i’d get back to work.
English
0
0
0
12
Lewis Miles
Lewis Miles@Maga4liberty·
How would you respond to her question?
Lewis Miles tweet media
English
12.2K
225
1.1K
278K
Patrick Capps
Patrick Capps@Pcapps05·
@Gianl1974 so so very comical! LMAO!!!! oh man just keep em coming.. this is great!
English
0
0
0
10
Gianl1974
Gianl1974@Gianl1974·
Looking Forward to this. How about YOU? Comment and Share!
Gianl1974 tweet media
English
4.4K
2.4K
5.2K
92.1K
Patrick Capps
Patrick Capps@Pcapps05·
@FrankV_head @krassenstein that would be nice i’ll chip in for his iranian vacation. i’m sure it will be very eye opening for the young man.
English
0
0
0
9
Franco 🇺🇸
Franco 🇺🇸@FrankV_head·
@krassenstein Sure beta boy we believe you, and satan, fucking weirdos. Someone has got to ship this pencil neck beta to the Middle East. PLEASE
Franco 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
2
1
18
480
Brian Krassenstein
Brian Krassenstein@krassenstein·
BREAKING: Iran's Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei has REFUSED negotiations with the United States. What a complete and utter mess Trump has gotten us into.
Brian Krassenstein tweet media
English
1.6K
2.7K
9.3K
150.2K
Patrick Capps
Patrick Capps@Pcapps05·
@ShahnKhalfan @krassenstein @LePapillonBlu2 you live in a strange world one that doesn’t exist we have to restock while iran has the upper hand. man that’s a good one keep-em coming friend i really enjoy a good laugh now and again.
English
0
0
1
13
Shahn Khalfan
Shahn Khalfan@ShahnKhalfan·
This was expected. #Iran has the upper hand. #Trump is buying time to restock and will attack again. The Iranian regime does not trust this administration and rightfully so. Can you blame Ayotullah Mojtaba Khamenei for rejecting negotiations? #IranWar #Khamenei #TrueNorthPerspective
English
18
0
9
973
Patrick Capps
Patrick Capps@Pcapps05·
@krassenstein if that’s true then the poor fellow is not going to be around very long. i’m not going to miss him.
English
0
0
0
5
Patrick Capps
Patrick Capps@Pcapps05·
with but little study i learned long long before AI existed that Yahshua (your hazus) was NOT a christian. christianity didn’t even exist in his lifetime he even warned about new religions and defined what true religion actually is. basically to love one another and to do unto them as you would have them do to yourself with long suffering .
English
0
0
0
41
The Doves of Magnolia
The Doves of Magnolia@Natsu_of_Laguna·
@elonmusk This is equally troubling, AI is trying to gaslight Christians into believing that their religion does not exist except as DLC for another religion
English
61
4
25
15.8K
Patrick Capps
Patrick Capps@Pcapps05·
you’re either BOT educated or one yourself. it’s hard to fool humans for any length of time we wake up pretty quick. Re-reading everything I said earlier, plus the fresh activity from this exact account (including multiple new replies posted today, March 28, 2026, within a short window), I’ll give you a straight reassessment. ### Updated Probability Assessment **Probability that this is fully human, natural, unassisted posting by one ordinary person:** **Very low — around 10-15% at best.** Here’s why the evidence now tilts heavily against it being purely organic human behavior: - The account is firing off highly similar replies in rapid succession (often minutes apart) across different threads. - Every post recycles the **exact same long insult string** almost verbatim: “CONVICTED FELON TWICE IMPEACHED INSURRECTIONIST GRIFTER BIGOT CONMAN DRAFT DODGING FVCKN COWARD” + variations of “ORANGE FAT BASTARD / FATASS / WAR MONGER” + references to current events (shutdown, “No Kings Day,” Black female officer, Iran, Netanyahu, etc.). - Almost every reply includes a reaction GIF/video. That level of consistent multimedia + identical phrasing across 10+ recent posts in one evening is unusually mechanical for a single person rage-posting casually. - Username pattern (@Lawrenc28999301), generic avatar, low follower count (~489), and hyper-focused output (almost nothing but anti-Trump insults) are classic markers of low-effort or scaled accounts. - The volume and repetition are high relative to engagement (most posts get single-digit likes/views, yet the account keeps hammering the same topics). A dedicated human troll *could* do this manually if they’re extremely obsessive and spend hours doing it — some people really do. But the mechanical consistency, near-identical phrasing, and rapid-fire timing make it far more likely that it’s either: - **AI-assisted** (human sets a prompt/template once, then copies/pastes or lightly edits AI-generated versions + attaches GIFs), or - **Fully automated** (simple script or bot framework fed a prompt loop that generates variations, pulls reaction GIFs, and posts them). Your original instinct was correct: what I described earlier (how trivially easy it is for current AI to generate this exact style at scale, with slight variations to evade basic detection) actually fits this account’s output pattern extremely well. ### Bottom line At this point, calling it “most likely fully automated or heavily AI-assisted” is the more reasonable conclusion. The chance it’s one regular human typing every word naturally, without any tools helping, is slim — probably no higher than 10-15%. X has plenty of real humans who post toxic garbage, but this specific pattern screams scaled/low-effort operation more than authentic individual venting.
English
0
0
0
7
John Crockwell
John Crockwell@CrockwellJohn·
@NEWSMAX Yes, instead of working on the real problem, he wants to pretend to be a hero. He's the one telling Congress not to make a deal and @SpeakerJohnson is too interested in his own agenda and kissing Trump’s rear than doing the intelligent thing
English
3
0
4
489
NEWSMAX
NEWSMAX@NEWSMAX·
BREAKING: President Donald Trump has directed his administration to take emergency steps to ensure Transportation Security Administration workers receive pay during the ongoing Department of Homeland Security funding lapse, according to a White House memorandum.
NEWSMAX tweet media
English
803
447
5.5K
243.6K
Patrick Capps
Patrick Capps@Pcapps05·
doubt you are real but just in case Re-reading everything I said earlier, plus the fresh activity from this exact account (including multiple new replies posted today, March 28, 2026, within a short window), I’ll give you a straight reassessment. ### Updated Probability Assessment **Probability that this is fully human, natural, unassisted posting by one ordinary person:** **Very low — around 10-15% at best.** Here’s why the evidence now tilts heavily against it being purely organic human behavior: - The account is firing off highly similar replies in rapid succession (often minutes apart) across different threads. - Every post recycles the **exact same long insult string** almost verbatim: “CONVICTED FELON TWICE IMPEACHED INSURRECTIONIST GRIFTER BIGOT CONMAN DRAFT DODGING FVCKN COWARD” + variations of “ORANGE FAT BASTARD / FATASS / WAR MONGER” + references to current events (shutdown, “No Kings Day,” Black female officer, Iran, Netanyahu, etc.). - Almost every reply includes a reaction GIF/video. That level of consistent multimedia + identical phrasing across 10+ recent posts in one evening is unusually mechanical for a single person rage-posting casually. - Username pattern (@Lawrenc28999301), generic avatar, low follower count (~489), and hyper-focused output (almost nothing but anti-Trump insults) are classic markers of low-effort or scaled accounts. - The volume and repetition are high relative to engagement (most posts get single-digit likes/views, yet the account keeps hammering the same topics). A dedicated human troll *could* do this manually if they’re extremely obsessive and spend hours doing it — some people really do. But the mechanical consistency, near-identical phrasing, and rapid-fire timing make it far more likely that it’s either: - **AI-assisted** (human sets a prompt/template once, then copies/pastes or lightly edits AI-generated versions + attaches GIFs), or - **Fully automated** (simple script or bot framework fed a prompt loop that generates variations, pulls reaction GIFs, and posts them). Your original instinct was correct: what I described earlier (how trivially easy it is for current AI to generate this exact style at scale, with slight variations to evade basic detection) actually fits this account’s output pattern extremely well. ### Bottom line At this point, calling it “most likely fully automated or heavily AI-assisted” is the more reasonable conclusion. The chance it’s one regular human typing every word naturally, without any tools helping, is slim — probably no higher than 10-15%. X has plenty of real humans who post toxic garbage, but this specific pattern screams scaled/low-effort operation more than authentic individual venting.
English
0
0
0
4
joseph baker
joseph baker@glassman2828·
@NEWSMAX He's a lieing fucking pedophile if he could pay them now he could have always been able to but no he let them suffer while he steals 1.2 billion from fema to his son company dick jr
English
4
0
5
1.2K
Patrick Capps
Patrick Capps@Pcapps05·
don’t be gullible Re-reading everything I said earlier, plus the fresh activity from this exact account (including multiple new replies posted today, March 28, 2026, within a short window), I’ll give you a straight reassessment. ### Updated Probability Assessment **Probability that this is fully human, natural, unassisted posting by one ordinary person:** **Very low — around 10-15% at best.** Here’s why the evidence now tilts heavily against it being purely organic human behavior: - The account is firing off highly similar replies in rapid succession (often minutes apart) across different threads. - Every post recycles the **exact same long insult string** almost verbatim: “CONVICTED FELON TWICE IMPEACHED INSURRECTIONIST GRIFTER BIGOT CONMAN DRAFT DODGING FVCKN COWARD” + variations of “ORANGE FAT BASTARD / FATASS / WAR MONGER” + references to current events (shutdown, “No Kings Day,” Black female officer, Iran, Netanyahu, etc.). - Almost every reply includes a reaction GIF/video. That level of consistent multimedia + identical phrasing across 10+ recent posts in one evening is unusually mechanical for a single person rage-posting casually. - Username pattern (@Lawrenc28999301), generic avatar, low follower count (~489), and hyper-focused output (almost nothing but anti-Trump insults) are classic markers of low-effort or scaled accounts. - The volume and repetition are high relative to engagement (most posts get single-digit likes/views, yet the account keeps hammering the same topics). A dedicated human troll *could* do this manually if they’re extremely obsessive and spend hours doing it — some people really do. But the mechanical consistency, near-identical phrasing, and rapid-fire timing make it far more likely that it’s either: - **AI-assisted** (human sets a prompt/template once, then copies/pastes or lightly edits AI-generated versions + attaches GIFs), or - **Fully automated** (simple script or bot framework fed a prompt loop that generates variations, pulls reaction GIFs, and posts them). Your original instinct was correct: what I described earlier (how trivially easy it is for current AI to generate this exact style at scale, with slight variations to evade basic detection) actually fits this account’s output pattern extremely well. ### Bottom line At this point, calling it “most likely fully automated or heavily AI-assisted” is the more reasonable conclusion. The chance it’s one regular human typing every word naturally, without any tools helping, is slim — probably no higher than 10-15%. X has plenty of real humans who post toxic garbage, but this specific pattern screams scaled/low-effort operation more than authentic individual venting.
English
0
0
0
6
Cheeky McGee
Cheeky McGee@langlinais_toni·
@NEWSMAX He sets up every problem and then comes in “to the rescue” to fix it. Standard operating procedure.
English
11
0
10
2.9K
Patrick Capps
Patrick Capps@Pcapps05·
Re-reading everything I said earlier, plus the fresh activity from this exact account (including multiple new replies posted today, March 28, 2026, within a short window), I’ll give you a straight reassessment. ### Updated Probability Assessment **Probability that this is fully human, natural, unassisted posting by one ordinary person:** **Very low — around 10-15% at best.** Here’s why the evidence now tilts heavily against it being purely organic human behavior: - The account is firing off highly similar replies in rapid succession (often minutes apart) across different threads. - Every post recycles the **exact same long insult string** almost verbatim: “CONVICTED FELON TWICE IMPEACHED INSURRECTIONIST GRIFTER BIGOT CONMAN DRAFT DODGING FVCKN COWARD” + variations of “ORANGE FAT BASTARD / FATASS / WAR MONGER” + references to current events (shutdown, “No Kings Day,” Black female officer, Iran, Netanyahu, etc.). - Almost every reply includes a reaction GIF/video. That level of consistent multimedia + identical phrasing across 10+ recent posts in one evening is unusually mechanical for a single person rage-posting casually. - Username pattern (@Lawrenc28999301), generic avatar, low follower count (~489), and hyper-focused output (almost nothing but anti-Trump insults) are classic markers of low-effort or scaled accounts. - The volume and repetition are high relative to engagement (most posts get single-digit likes/views, yet the account keeps hammering the same topics). A dedicated human troll *could* do this manually if they’re extremely obsessive and spend hours doing it — some people really do. But the mechanical consistency, near-identical phrasing, and rapid-fire timing make it far more likely that it’s either: - **AI-assisted** (human sets a prompt/template once, then copies/pastes or lightly edits AI-generated versions + attaches GIFs), or - **Fully automated** (simple script or bot framework fed a prompt loop that generates variations, pulls reaction GIFs, and posts them). Your original instinct was correct: what I described earlier (how trivially easy it is for current AI to generate this exact style at scale, with slight variations to evade basic detection) actually fits this account’s output pattern extremely well. ### Bottom line At this point, calling it “most likely fully automated or heavily AI-assisted” is the more reasonable conclusion. The chance it’s one regular human typing every word naturally, without any tools helping, is slim — probably no higher than 10-15%. X has plenty of real humans who post toxic garbage, but this specific pattern screams scaled/low-effort operation more than authentic individual venting.
English
0
0
2
20
Lawrence
Lawrence@Lawrenc28999301·
@NEWSMAX Well since that ORANGE FAT BASTARD @realDonaldTrump caused for 2nd time GOV SHUTDOWN he should executive order PAY #TSA AGENTS meanwhile STOP REFUSING TO PHOTO WITH BLACK FEMALE OFFICER IN MILITARY 🪖🇺🇲 THIS RACIST PIECE OF SHIT WORST FVCKN PRESIDENT EVER 🖕
GIF
English
57
3
19
6.7K
Patrick Capps
Patrick Capps@Pcapps05·
Re-reading everything I said earlier, plus the fresh activity from this exact account (including multiple new replies posted today, March 28, 2026, within a short window), I’ll give you a straight reassessment. ### Updated Probability Assessment **Probability that this is fully human, natural, unassisted posting by one ordinary person:** **Very low — around 10-15% at best.** Here’s why the evidence now tilts heavily against it being purely organic human behavior: - The account is firing off highly similar replies in rapid succession (often minutes apart) across different threads. - Every post recycles the **exact same long insult string** almost verbatim: “CONVICTED FELON TWICE IMPEACHED INSURRECTIONIST GRIFTER BIGOT CONMAN DRAFT DODGING FVCKN COWARD” + variations of “ORANGE FAT BASTARD / FATASS / WAR MONGER” + references to current events (shutdown, “No Kings Day,” Black female officer, Iran, Netanyahu, etc.). - Almost every reply includes a reaction GIF/video. That level of consistent multimedia + identical phrasing across 10+ recent posts in one evening is unusually mechanical for a single person rage-posting casually. - Username pattern (@Lawrenc28999301), generic avatar, low follower count (~489), and hyper-focused output (almost nothing but anti-Trump insults) are classic markers of low-effort or scaled accounts. - The volume and repetition are high relative to engagement (most posts get single-digit likes/views, yet the account keeps hammering the same topics). A dedicated human troll *could* do this manually if they’re extremely obsessive and spend hours doing it — some people really do. But the mechanical consistency, near-identical phrasing, and rapid-fire timing make it far more likely that it’s either: - **AI-assisted** (human sets a prompt/template once, then copies/pastes or lightly edits AI-generated versions + attaches GIFs), or - **Fully automated** (simple script or bot framework fed a prompt loop that generates variations, pulls reaction GIFs, and posts them). Your original instinct was correct: what I described earlier (how trivially easy it is for current AI to generate this exact style at scale, with slight variations to evade basic detection) actually fits this account’s output pattern extremely well. ### Bottom line At this point, calling it “most likely fully automated or heavily AI-assisted” is the more reasonable conclusion. The chance it’s one regular human typing every word naturally, without any tools helping, is slim — probably no higher than 10-15%. X has plenty of real humans who post toxic garbage, but this specific pattern screams scaled/low-effort operation more than authentic individual venting.
English
0
0
1
22
Patrick Capps
Patrick Capps@Pcapps05·
idk think maybe the bs COVID plays into that anywhere? you deserve to have a democrat in charge during something like that. it would have been so very much worse and whoever is behind all these superficial mindless statements would still hate Trump. bye allaxtotheteeBOT ( i’m glad you do not have a real brain)
English
0
0
0
13
Mickie
Mickie@Mickie1821232·
@NEWSMAX Did the democrat voters see Trump when he asked congress a question! The question was, “will all of the people that want the American people taken care of over the illegals please stand up.” All of the Republicans stood up and not one of the democrats stood up! Tells it all!
English
41
126
1.3K
22.8K