David Jaros

15.6K posts

David Jaros banner
David Jaros

David Jaros

@ProfDavidJaros

Faculty Director, Center for Criminal Justice Reform, University of Baltimore School of Law. Views are my own...even the mistaken ones. he/him

เข้าร่วม Eylül 2012
1.1K กำลังติดตาม1.7K ผู้ติดตาม
David Jaros รีทวีตแล้ว
Aaron Rupar
Aaron Rupar@atrupar·
OSSOFF: Your opening statement stated that as a result of last summer's airstrikes, Iran's nuclear enrichment program was 'obliterated.' Correct? GABBARD: That's right OSSOFF: The WH stated on March 1 that this war was launched to 'eliminate the imminent nuclear threat posed by the Iranian regime.' Does the IC assess that there was an imminent nuclear threat? GABBARD: The only person who can determine what is or is not an imminent threat is the president OSSOFF: False
English
329
3.6K
12.7K
785.6K
David Jaros รีทวีตแล้ว
Acyn
Acyn@Acyn·
Neguse: Where is this company headquartered? Noem: I don’t know. Neguse: I don’t know either. We can’t find it. We did find an address that’s registered to a political operative. This company that received 143 million dollars was incorporated 8 days before this contract went out. You want the American people to believe that this is all above board, that $143 million of taxpayer money just happened to go to this one company that doesn't have a headquarters, doesn't have a website, has never done work for the federal government before and is registered apparently or attached to a residence from a political operative, and of course one of the subcontractors of that contract, as you know, is a political firm that's tied to, to you back when you were governor of South Dakota?
English
2.6K
31.3K
127.4K
8.4M
David Jaros รีทวีตแล้ว
George Pu
George Pu@TheGeorgePu·
Sam Altman was fired by his own board. His co-founder Ilya left. His top researchers left to start Anthropic. His head of alignment quit. He dissolved the safety team and its replacement. He converted a nonprofit into an $850B for-profit. He removed 'safely' from the mission statement. His employees begged him to stand with Anthropic. He said he would. That night he took the deal they refused. Then announced it on X like a victory lap. And you still think this man is building AI for humanity?
English
276
2.2K
20.1K
682.3K
David Jaros รีทวีตแล้ว
Jez
Jez@JezCorden·
"Cancel ChatGPT" goes mainstream after Sam Altman takes the U.S. department of war deal Anthropic refused — in surveillance of U.S. citizens and autonomous weapons. Altman claimed that ChatGPT wouldn't be used for these purposes, but was immediately contradicted by a U.S. official. OpenAI users aren't very happy about it, and rightfully so. Anthropic has been blacklisted by the U.S. administration for refusing to back down on its red lines. OpenAI picked up the bag. windowscentral.com/artificial-int…
English
366
4.2K
12.4K
679.3K
David Jaros รีทวีตแล้ว
Rutger Bregman
Rutger Bregman@rcbregman·
Sam Altman is such an incredible backstabber, liar and traitor. While your competitor is taking a heroic and principled stand, you swoop in to make your deal. Imagine working for this guy - is there a greater shame? This should lead to a mass exodus from OpenAI.
Sam Altman@sama

Tonight, we reached an agreement with the Department of War to deploy our models in their classified network. In all of our interactions, the DoW displayed a deep respect for safety and a desire to partner to achieve the best possible outcome. AI safety and wide distribution of benefits are the core of our mission. Two of our most important safety principles are prohibitions on domestic mass surveillance and human responsibility for the use of force, including for autonomous weapon systems. The DoW agrees with these principles, reflects them in law and policy, and we put them into our agreement. We also will build technical safeguards to ensure our models behave as they should, which the DoW also wanted. We will deploy FDEs to help with our models and to ensure their safety, we will deploy on cloud networks only. We are asking the DoW to offer these same terms to all AI companies, which in our opinion we think everyone should be willing to accept. We have expressed our strong desire to see things de-escalate away from legal and governmental actions and towards reasonable agreements. We remain committed to serve all of humanity as best we can. The world is a complicated, messy, and sometimes dangerous place.

English
771
6.1K
51.5K
1.8M
David Jaros รีทวีตแล้ว
Dustin
Dustin@r0ck3t23·
Dario Amodei just gave his first interview since the Pentagon blacklisted his company. The toll is visible on his face. He was asked one question. What would you say to the President right now? He didn’t hesitate. Amodei: “We are patriotic Americans. Everything we have done has been for the sake of this country.” Anthropic built their models to defend America. They were the first AI lab cleared for classified military systems. They wanted to help the warfighter. But the Pentagon demanded unrestricted access to fully autonomous weapons and mass surveillance of American citizens. Amodei drew the line. The government responded with emergency Cold War powers. A supply chain designation normally reserved for foreign adversaries. A six-month federal phaseout ordered from Truth Social. Amodei: “When we were threatened with supply chain designation and Defense Production Act, which are unprecedented intrusions into the private economy, we exercised our classic First Amendment rights to speak up and disagree with the government.” The administration framed Anthropic’s refusal as anti-American. Amodei’s response dismantled that framing in one sentence. Amodei: “Disagreeing with the government is the most American thing in the world.” Here is the deeper paradox nobody in Washington wants to say out loud. We are in a geopolitical race against autocratic adversaries who use AI for mass surveillance of their own citizens and autonomous weapons with no human oversight. The Pentagon demanded that Anthropic build those exact capabilities for America. Amodei: “The red lines we have drawn, we drew because we believe that crossing those red lines is contrary to American values.” You cannot defeat authoritarianism by adopting its methods. You cannot defend the open society by forcing private companies to build its antithesis under threat of wartime emergency powers. Anthropic held the line. Got blacklisted for it. And came out the other side saying the same thing they said going in. That is what it actually looks like to mean it.
English
865
6.5K
23.7K
1.4M
David Jaros รีทวีตแล้ว
David Folkenflik
David Folkenflik@davidfolkenflik·
Veteran CBS News producer Mary Walsh takes leave (first reported by Guardian) "We've been told to aim our reporting at a particular part of the political spectrum. Honestly, I don't know how to do that."
David Folkenflik tweet media
English
402
2.2K
5.9K
359.9K
David Jaros รีทวีตแล้ว
Dr. Catharine Young
Dr. Catharine Young@DrCatharineY·
The cover of the Lancet. It says it all.
Dr. Catharine Young tweet media
English
614
9.6K
29.8K
818.7K
David Jaros รีทวีตแล้ว
Pedro L. Gonzalez
Pedro L. Gonzalez@emeriticus·
National Review's warnings about Trump from the start have been vindicated. There's no point denying it. And I'm glad to see that it is one of the vanishingly few outlets on the right where people can still speak out against the corruption of the Trump-Vance administration.
moe tkacik@moetkacik

the National Fucking Review:

English
15
151
1.1K
39.3K
David Jaros รีทวีตแล้ว
The Tennessee Holler
The Tennessee Holler@TheTNHoller·
For those keeping score at home:
The Tennessee Holler tweet media
English
1.6K
15.6K
56.4K
1.6M
David Jaros รีทวีตแล้ว
Mike Levin
Mike Levin@MikeLevin·
This should be a bigger story. A Reagan-appointed judge just ruled Trump’s Energy Secretary illegally ran a secret panel of climate deniers to cook up a biased report and sabotage clean air rules. They didn’t follow the law, didn’t follow the science, and betrayed the public to serve Trump’s agenda. Disgraceful. nytimes.com/2026/01/30/cli…
English
732
13.8K
28.1K
551.2K
David Jaros รีทวีตแล้ว
David Jaros รีทวีตแล้ว
philip lewis
philip lewis@Phil_Lewis_·
Civil rights activist Medgar Evers was shot in the back by a Klansman in 1963. The National Park Service has removed visitor brochures from Evers' museum and reportedly plans to remove references that call his murderer a “racist" mississippitoday.org/2026/02/05/med…
English
380
8.1K
16K
1.3M
David Jaros รีทวีตแล้ว
Emily Opilo
Emily Opilo@emilyopilo·
The Baltimore State’s Attorney’s decision to sever its partnership with the city’s anti-violence program is “neither legally required nor factually justified,” according to an opinion commissioned by Mayor Scott that just dropped (w/@justin_fenton) thebanner.com/politics-power…
English
0
7
5
11.7K
David Jaros รีทวีตแล้ว
David Moon
David Moon@DavidMoon2014·
VIDEO: Maryland's pro-ICE Sheriffs & County leaders came to Annapolis to testify AGAINST banning local police from helping ICE with deportations. I had the chance to ask them questions about the so-called 287g programs that push local police to spend resources doing ICE's job:
English
71
64
246
11.5K
David Jaros รีทวีตแล้ว
Republicans against Trump
Republicans against Trump@RpsAgainstTrump·
Reporter: The president called you a loser. Republican Senator Thom Tillis: “I am thrilled about that. That makes me qualified to be homeland security secretary and senior adviser to the president.”
English
1.2K
13.2K
109.1K
3.6M
David Jaros
David Jaros@ProfDavidJaros·
Five moments in the Alex Pretti shooting that raise red flags for policing experts wapo.st/49ZqtqC
English
0
0
0
64