Jerry Reyes

@IanSmith_HSA @RedGrindingHood His basis is from the replies here in x .. better to keep mouth shut if he can't state the facts ... Imagine trusting a 100m market cap but if I bought a couple of thousand dollars right now it can move up to 2-3% , weird right?

@RedGrindingHood Weird that QRL is trusted so much when they don't patch CVE advisories.

So $cell won the poll, but not by that much 👀 From what I am seeing though, $qrl is clearly the most trusted But I believe that $cell has the highest upside because of the difference between the tech and price $Qrl has an extremely respectable market cap so we can't pretend that the upside is giant But we also can't pretend that $cell or $qanx is as safe as $qrl

@coinbureau It's possible with cbtc $celfframe

✅BITCOIN MAY GO QUANTUM-SAFE WITHOUT ANY UPGRADE A new proposal introduces “Quantum Safe Bitcoin (QSB),” designed to stay secure “even against powerful quantum computer running Shor’s algorithm.” It works within Bitcoin’s current system (no fork needed), but is costly and not suited for everyday use. Seen as a temporary fix while the community debates a long-term solution.

@StarkWareLtd Cbtc can make it happen $cellframe

Quantum-Safe Bitcoin Transactions Without Softforks

@Sp00derWeb @RedGrindingHood No way qrl is the correct choice .. no way in a million ways

@RedGrindingHood QUANX is a complete scam and not post quantum anything. CELL is... problematic and over 80% ERC20 which is not quantum resistant. $QRL is the only correct choice

Which is the king of quantum from this 3? $cell $qrl $qanx Drop a comment to justify if you actually have a thesis and not just holding for the sake of it

@SingularIV66301 @RedGrindingHood So why you need to say Russia if you are not discriminating.. weird right?

We choose $QRL. The two others are not PQ secure. $Qanx doesn't have mainnet, $Cell has but still with over 80% ERC-20 tokens on non PQ secure conventional infrastructure. Besides, as institutional investor in Canada we cannot ignore the long term high future risk on $Cell because of its Russia background. In the future its ecosystem may dissuade more western institutional investors like us given the national financial security compliance concern.

@projecteleven @apruden08 And that is why $cellframe is built for . You're safe haven in quantum attack

On why we must migrate to post-quantum cryptography BEFORE quantum computers get powerful enough... "If I have a quantum computer and I can run it fast enough, I can just wait for every single migration transaction and pick them off." - @apruden08

@conordeegan Are you sure, how about looking into cellframe

I've been working on a post-quantum cryptography registry/wiki and it's now live. If you're an engineer trying to evaluate PQC algorithms side by side, you have to piece together information from FIPS documents, ePrint papers, mailing list threads, and scattered READMEs. There are some existing resources out there for parameter sets but I wanted something that goes much further and includes everything; algorithm descriptions, use case and feature filtering, benchmarks, implementation references, and wiki-style prose all in one place with a consistent schema. So that's what this is. It covers nine algorithms today; the NIST standards (ML-KEM, ML-DSA, SLH-DSA), the NIST pipeline (FN-DSA, HQC), blockchain-specific schemes (SHRINCS, SHRIMPS, leanSig), and XMSS. There are a lot more I want to add and the registry is open source so contributions are welcome.

@projecteleven Just partner with cellframe

Latest Update Cloudflare: 52% of traffic already PQ. Fully PQ by 2029 Google: Chrome already post-quantum. Fully PQ by 2029 Microsoft: PQ by 2030 AWS: Some services PQ Apple: Hybrid PQ OpenSSH & OpenSSL: Already PQ Signal & WhatsApp: Hybrid PQ Bitcoin: Maybe one day idk

@RoarWeb3 Quantum coin called cellframe

I’m buying. I need a 1000x. Shill me.

@airdop_crypto Scam