Rian Darius Pandole

2.6K posts

Rian Darius Pandole

Rian Darius Pandole

@RDPandole

Building | Ex Growth Equity at Alpha Wave Global | Investment Banking at BofA | Tennis Player | Columbia x 2 | NYC / Mumbai

NYC เข้าร่วม Ocak 2024
649 กำลังติดตาม2.2K ผู้ติดตาม
ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Rian Darius Pandole
Rian Darius Pandole@RDPandole·
What we can learn from history is this: Competition between countries is a greater catalyst than competition between corporations. This is only too evident in how lackadaisical the US has gotten post the Cold War. There is a a very interesting show on Apple TV+ called “for all mankind” - It considers an alternate past where it was the Russians (not the Americans) that made it to the moon first, and consequently we made it to Mars already way earlier than anything @elonmusk is working on. The govt push to build stuff at infrastructural / paradigm shifting scale of the likes of Nanomaterials / Arpanet (which evolved into the Internet) / Nuclear fusion etc has been lost because post-cold war the US emerged as the apex power and has since become complacent. Now with the emergence of China as an “innovation frontier”, we’re seeing the early embers of a rekindling of the competitive spirit at a foundational level. Companies and private enterprise will do whatever is required to enrich shareholders, but govts competing with each other work (more often than not) to develop tech results in uplifting and enriching entire nation states and our species as a whole (think of the space race and the post Soviet collapse complacency that set in when Elon mentions it's been 50 years since humans ventured as far out in space as they did last week and you see what I mean) We need more grand visionaries and statesmen of the quality of a Vannevar Bush and his like, who planted the seeds for the forest they imagined possible but never got to enjoy the fruit of. He imagined a world connected with devices and pages that leapt back and fwd in context with hyperlinks between them. A vision that kicked off DARPA’s pursuit for the ARPANET and consequently MILNET and then the Internet). These are the kind of visionaries I speak of. Not the app makers that are abundant, and not of the technology builders that work to turn non-profits into shareholder enriching vehicles.
Rian Darius Pandole@RDPandole

There’s a lot of foundational innovation I look fwd to: Quantum Computing, Nuclear Fusion, Life Extension, Extra Planetary Colonisation, Superconductivity, Functional UBI etc However, at the non-foundational level, there’s been nothing superbly paradigm shifting after the internet since www / email / instant messaging / mobile telephony that’s upgraded our world Everything else now that’s built atop the internet is just tinkering at the edges, which is why we have tons of apps and SaaS products.. and that’s why most of them fail. Consider SaaS for instance: it’s (now) mostly just people trying to discover a niche or an edge case to serve. To conclude: My view on current tech built upon the internet is that there are no more “innovation models” ie no more models in discovering the next big play such as social networks or smartphones for mobile apps or crypto anywhere in the world. It’s now about discovering and filling niches at scale backed by the power of AI ie thrown tons of “niche solutions” seeking problems at the wall and if you can throw enough of these (because now AI enables you to come up with way more solutions than humanely possible in a period of time) you can be sure some of these will stick and a few of them will maybe take you to reasonable scale. This is true for all of the world - The differentiation on innovation has compressed / shrunk massively in the back of AI and LLMs.

English
1
0
8
5.5K
Rian Darius Pandole
Rian Darius Pandole@RDPandole·
Apple Maps > Google Maps .. and it ain’t close
English
1
0
1
143
Rian Darius Pandole
Rian Darius Pandole@RDPandole·
Interesting perspective but imo: 1. Maguire’s right that arrogance was a blind spot and collaboration beats condescension .. but the cooernican metaphor sort of overcooks the humility stepping knto borderline self-doubt .. 2. ⁠SV (and the broader tech ecosystem) isn’t (for the first time in forever) revolving around the physical giants .. it’s finally big enough to integrate them fully .. unlocking the next S-curve 3. ⁠so: the toddler grew up and is now building “the solar system” .. and that’s not reversal .. that’s dominance through integration 4. ⁠The real risk is underestimating how fast tech will make those “advanced” legacy processes look quaint in hindsight
TBPN@tbpn

Sequoia’s @shaunmmaguire says Silicon Valley is undergoing a "Copernican" shift and waking up to the fact that it revolves around a set of much larger industries, not the other way around: "In Silicon Valley, [there's] almost this Copernican principle — where people used to believe that the world revolved around the Earth, then realized that it revolves around the sun." "There's a Silicon Valley parallel where people think that all of technology, all of industry, revolves around Silicon Valley, but it's actually kind of the opposite." "Silicon Valley is Earth, and there are these much bigger forces and bodies, which include energy, the chemical industry, these giant supply chains, and the semiconductor industry, which has been around for a very long time. It was pretty advanced, and people in Silicon Valley forgot about it." "I don't like the language of other industries pivoting into AI. I actually think it's the opposite." "I think it's like Silicon Valley is waking up from its toddlerhood and realizing that there were these giant industries that we underestimated, and they're actually really freaking good at what they do. And we can all benefit by working together." From his appearance in March.

English
0
0
1
101
Rian Darius Pandole
Rian Darius Pandole@RDPandole·
For all the criticism in India about the markets, INR depreciation etc, it is important to note that India is for now an oasis of calm in a world of chaos .. we have relatively assured energy security and a peaceful environment that we exist in the important thing is that India for the most part seems to keep running as-is (mostly unaffected by the west asian chaos) .. our schools and factories and offices haven’t shut down .. our airlines and logistics continue to operate as they were All of this is only been possible because of diplomacy that the govt has indulged in where they’ve bridged relations with all of usa, russia, israel, uae, saudi, oman and everybody else that matters.. so our energy supplies and our logistics continue to flow People in India complaining right now are too focused on their own bottomline and is blind to the chaos in se-asia with energy supplies or the war in west asia and how that’s more affecting the actual lives of citizens there and not just their bottomlines
English
1
1
3
66
Rian Darius Pandole
Rian Darius Pandole@RDPandole·
Fwiw one of the most significant things that PM Modi’s announced in the last few days that nobody has picked up on is the commitment to exponentially expanding India’s ship-building capacity .. this has historically always been the lead indicator of emperical influence and it continues to stay relevant in our times too Feel like it's barely been reported on anywhere because literally no one understands the significance of it ..
Normal Guy@Normal_2610

One EV motor needs 1-2 kg of these magnets, A single wind turbine can need 200-400 kg. Missiles and drones use them for precise control. China makes 94% of the world’s sintered version (the strong, high-performance kind) and has a 30-year head start in mining + processing. They’ve already started restricting exports, Ford had to shut a factory line because of it. India has the world’s third-largest rare earth reserves but produces less than 1% of global output. We dig it up… then ship it to China… then buy back the finished magnets.

English
0
0
1
146
Rian Darius Pandole
Rian Darius Pandole@RDPandole·
Yea idk about this .. 1. Automation spreads across the entire system, not just parts 2. Bottlenecks eventually get automated too 3. New tech changes how systems are designed 4. So jobs like plumbers probably wouldn’t remain special forever
TBPN@tbpn

.@travisk says AI will make human labor even more valuable and in-demand than ever before: "Let's say the entire world - everything in our world - was automated, except for plumbers. You had machines making buildings - you would basically have like a thousand buildings a day." "How valuable would those plumbers be?" "Each and every plumber would be like LeBron. Why? Because plumbing would be the long pole in the tent to progress. You can't get those thousand buildings unless you have a plumber." "And by the way, you'd get so much efficiency everywhere else that you'd need millions of plumbers." "Humans [are going to] become more and more valuable because they will be the long pole in the tent to progress - and that progress is going to accelerate and get faster and more robust."

English
0
0
0
87
Rian Darius Pandole
Rian Darius Pandole@RDPandole·
It may be well past the sell by date on this in the US .. money chases talent🤝hunger .. and the gravity has shifted on that sink now away from the US .. the US mil-ind complex was both the source and sink of a lot of innovation .. meaning he government funded the innovation and bought it .. .. but once that energy shifted to VCs / PEs they sought out the lowest cost of scaling up.. basically the zero-one that defined the US on the back of agencies like darpa etc got bloated massively and then started chasing cost efficiencies on the back of 1-100 privatised buildouts
Patrick OShaughnessy@patrick_oshag

Shyam on why the US needs to become reindustrialization maximalists: "The biggest lie of globalization was that the US would do the innovation while China did the production. The breakthrough behind the Attention Is All You Need paper came from Google trying to improve Translate by 3%. Innovation is a consequence of production. WuXi went from being a cheap pair of hands for pipetting contract research to now 50% of all clinical trials are drugs that are created in China. We ceded the innovation. It wasn't taken from us. We ceded it because we had a completely incorrect preset. I don't think it's true that we're not great at building things in this country. Look at Elon and the progeny of Elon. Apple has spent the equivalent on an inflation adjusted basis in the last five years of two and a half Marshall plans (~$350B+) building talent and capacity in China. How about we try to spend one Marshall plan here?"

English
0
0
1
162
Gaetano
Gaetano@crux_capital_·
The relative strength in $AAOI is something to note On a day where: $SPY is down ~1% $LITE is down ~5% $COHR is down ~8% $CIEN is down ~12% $AAOI just turned green Will be very interesting to see what happens once the tailwinds blow again for the sector and when the macro tape clears up
Gaetano@crux_capital_

$AAOI We have more insight! CFO Stefan Murry spoke at the Raymond James Conference yesterday And it was filled with great nuggets. Let's unpack! 1. The Firmware issue. First off, we already have one milestone update from my linked post. They said the 800G firmware issue is RESOLVED. Murry clarified that the firmware issue only delayed about $2 million of 800G shipments in Q4, but more importantly, he stated the issue is now resolved and the new firmware has shipped. He explicitly confirmed that regardless of the Q4/Q1 shift, the massive 800G volume ramp starting in Q2 2026 is completely on schedule. Nice! 2. The InP laser moat is the industry bottleneck The analyst asked about the news from yesterday that $NVDA is taking equity stakes/partnerships in $COHR and $LITE. Murry explained that hyperscalers are realizing that the absolute bottleneck in the AI supply chain right now is InP laser fabrication capacity. Because $AAOI is one of the rare companies that actually owns its own laser fab and grows its own crystals, they are in a highly strategic position to capture this demand as hyperscalers scramble to secure long-term capacity. 3. U.S. manufacturing costs I thought this was interesting to hear! And was something I was curious about on the watchlist with their Texas ramp. Manufacturing their highly-automated transceivers in the U.S. only costs about 10% to 15% more than producing them in Asia. He noted that hyperscalers view securing their supply chain as an "existential" priority for their AI buildouts, so they are more than happy to absorb that slight cost increase to guarantee a secure, U.S.-made supply free from geopolitical risks. 4. Pricing power Because the industry is so severely supply-constrained, Murry said that the historical standard of 15% to 20% annual price reductions is "not really on the table at this point". He also gave hard numbers on current pricing: 800G is selling for around $400, and 1.6T will be between $700 and $800. Again, interesting to hear. 5. The Mid-2027 $378M Monthly Target Murry confirmed that their massive mid-2027 target of $378 million in monthly revenue is modeled specifically around the anticipated demand from three hyperscale customers. To hit this, they will initially scale in Taiwan this year, but by 2027, the vast majority of their 800G and 1.6T production will be physically located in the United States. So they really aren't backing down from this. Again, like I've mentioned, while this is very exciting we still need to closely track their execution to build more conviction in this number 6. A Pivot from LIDAR The high-power, narrow-linewidth lasers that $AAOI needs to supply the upcoming CPO market were actually developed years ago for autonomous vehicle LiDAR applications. Because the self-driving car market didn't materialize as quickly as expected, they have perfectly pivoted that exact technology into powering AI data centers. All in all, I thought this was a great follow on conference to a very talked about earnings! What do you all think? Also, thank you @Anointed_Ape for putting this on my radar, appreciate it!

English
15
2
115
24.9K
Serenity
Serenity@aleabitoreddit·
High conviction long: $AAOI. I genuinely think this could easily be a 3x by next year. Nvidia funded $COHR, who does Malaysia manufacturing for 800G/1.6T. $LITE uses FN in Thailand for volume production, and has it's own manufacturing in Thailand. I will keep hammering this home but Applied Optoelectronics is only pure Made in America, optical transceiver play. Again, the two "American" optical companies outsourced it to Asia, while $AAOI spent the years building up capacity and fabs in Texas. Nvidia funded both $COHR and $LITE just now to build out a US-version to insulate its most critical supply chain from geopolitical risks. But guess who already has the supply chain setup and is years ahead in that regard? $AAOI. $LITE ($55B) FY 2026 est. ~$2.91B $AAOI ($7.1B MC) H2 2027: $4.35B ARR. $AAOI will actually leapfrong Lite FY 2026 projections if management executes (and with ~40% gross margins). Once again. $AAOI ($7B) will leapfrog $LITE ($55B MC) entire 2026 revenue projections if they deliver their projections. $FN over in Asia, 2026 projections are actually around the exact same as AAOI. ~4.39B revenue off 12.4% gross margins. And it's a $20B MC (with much lower margins) Even if $AAOI hits 70% of their target, it's likely to be heavily re-rated way past it's current marketcap. TLDR: Hard to see downside with $AAOI at these levels, especially with 3-4 hyperscalers (likely $GOOGL, $MSFT, $AMZN) wanting to buy up any capacity it can make for years out. And with $GOOGL not going the CPO route. $AAOI leapfrogs $CRDO, $ALAB, $LITE, and others in growth + benefits from photonics theme vs. copper (from the first two). $AAOI remains an asymmetrical 1Y high conviction as long as management delivers.
Serenity tweet media
English
102
153
1.4K
460.9K
Rian Darius Pandole
Rian Darius Pandole@RDPandole·
Will be tough .. zuck’s always wanted to own his own hardware since apple pulled the plug on meta with stricter privacy impositions .. but distribution is a steep hill to climb (for anyone.. even meta .. and this is why it’s brutal for someone like oai to even take up that challenge) it’s why I've always found it odd to see zuck try and pull a fast one on apple by trying to “invent” a new hardware vertical .. feel the same way about OAI .. but excited to see it play out ofc
Robert Scoble@Scobleizer

My prediction is that the @OpenAI device (rumored to have camera, microphone, and speaker, which means it has a full computer inside with a few other sensors and radios) will be very small. Easy to throw in your pocket. Or put on the desk next to you where it will watch you work. Or your sink, watching you wash dishes. Or your stove top, watching you cook dinner. Or your coffee table, watching you cuddle with your wife or lover or kids or dog on the couch. Or in the car, on the dash, watching you drive (or in my car, talking with you while the car drives). It will bring joy to each of these places, based on my playing with @TheIllusionOfLife's virtual character running on similar, albeit not as small as I expect this device to be. Apple is also rumored to be working on a similar device. My heart says Apple will put it all together, but my brain says they are too big to really innovate on AI the way @OpenAI can. That said, next year Apple is expecting to sell 20 million. So the question is can OpenAI ruin its plans? I will certainly have one of each, at minimum, and if I do I bet a lot of you will too. Then we'll see who has best. Only one will have @openclaw.

English
0
0
0
137
Rian Darius Pandole
Rian Darius Pandole@RDPandole·
V impressive but the chinese robots only solve for choreographed movements .. not one has shown anything even remotely capable in terms of hands dexterity .. the only thing that optimus and @elonmusk is focused on solving for right now
Tristan@Tristan0x

This aired tonight to 1 billion people in China. A year ago these robots could barely wave a handkerchief, now they can do backflips and kung fu with nunchucks. Physical intelligence is the next frontier.

English
1
0
0
229
Rian Darius Pandole
Rian Darius Pandole@RDPandole·
Interestingly, we don't see Anthropic make as many of these deals as OAI .. Better utilisation of resources 🤝 lower burn on the back of smaller critical mass due to its enterprise focus
Kakashii@kakashiii111

Sooner rather than later, OpenAI will announce they raised funds from Amazon, Nvidia, and Microsoft. Andy, Jensen, and Satya will announce how happy they are to be part of OpenAI’s future and blah blah… but the real story is below: they have no choice but to fund OpenAI.

English
0
0
0
246
Rian Darius Pandole
Rian Darius Pandole@RDPandole·
Google is the template for legacy not losing the crown in ai ..
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

Sundar just told you Google is becoming an infrastructure company and nobody’s repricing. The victory lap covers $400B in annual revenue, 18% growth, and 48% cloud acceleration. The numbers are legitimately excellent. Beat on both top and bottom lines. But the number he slipped in quietly is the one that matters: $175 to $185 billion in 2026 capex. Wall Street was modeling $119.5 billion. Google just told the market it plans to spend 50% more than anyone expected, and nearly double what it spent in 2025. Put that in perspective. There are only 59 companies in the S&P 500 that Alphabet couldn’t outright purchase with one year’s capex budget. This is infrastructure spending on the scale of a mid-sized nation’s GDP. The stock tells you everything about how the market processed this. It dropped 7% in minutes after the print, then clawed back to down ~3%. Investors loved the earnings. They panicked at the spend. Because $180 billion in capex means free cash flow gets compressed even as revenue grows. Operating cash flow rose 34% this quarter, but free cash flow barely moved because capex ate every incremental dollar. Google Cloud’s $240 billion backlog, up 55% sequentially, is the justification. They signed more billion-dollar deals in 2025 than the previous three years combined. Cloud revenue grew 48%, margins expanded to 30%. This is real demand from real customers. The spend has receipts. The question investors are actually asking: is Google transitioning from a 30%+ margin ad business into a capital-intensive infrastructure provider that happens to run ads? Because Meta’s 2026 capex guide is $115-135B. Microsoft is at ~$150B annualized. Google just outbid them all. Pichai mentioned they cut Gemini serving costs by 78% over 2025. That efficiency gain is real. But when your response to 78% cost reduction is to double your infrastructure budget, you’re telling the market you see demand curves that justify spending at a scale nobody else is willing to match. The ad business is still the engine. Search grew 17%. But YouTube ads missed estimates. The growth story is quietly shifting from “best ad platform ever built” to “best AI infrastructure play with an ad business attached.” That’s the trade Wall Street is trying to figure out tonight.

English
0
0
0
118
Rian Darius Pandole
Rian Darius Pandole@RDPandole·
I want to believe in the company but their entire existence seems so threatened .. bulls keep mentioning their proprietary data as a moat .. but after using the app it seems like the main thing they have is tuning for language learning .. and all other things like forgetting curve etc are generic .. now if you layer a forgetting curve with an llm to generate dynamic content and what does that make of duolingo?
Antonio Linares@alc2022

$DUOL investors are upset. $DUOL customers are not.

English
0
0
0
198
Rian Darius Pandole
Rian Darius Pandole@RDPandole·
Banger .. tons of alpha here
Matt Turck@mattturck

NVIDIA's New Moat & Why China is "Semiconductor Pilled” — loved my conversation with Dylan Patel (@dylan522p). Raw, incredibly insightful, and... hilarious. 00:00 - Intro 01:16 - Nvidia acquires Groq: A pivot to specialization 07:09 - Why AI models might need "wide" compute, not just fast 10:06 - Is the CUDA moat dead? (Open source vs. Nvidia) 17:49 - The startup landscape: Etched, Cerebras, and 1% odds 22:51 - Geopolitics: China's "semiconductor-pilled" culture 35:46 - Huawei's vertical integration is terrifying 39:28 - The $100B AI revenue reality check 41:12 - US Onshoring: Why total self-sufficiency is a fantasy 44:55 - Can the US actually build fabs? (The delay problem) 48:33 - The CapEx Bubble: Is $500B spending irrational? 54:53 - Energy Crisis: Why gas turbines will power AI, not nuclear 57:06 - The "AI uses all the water" myth (Hamburger comparison) 1:03:40 - Circular Debt? Debunking the Nvidia-CoreWeave risk 1:07:24 - Claude Code & the software singularity 1:10:23 - The death of the Junior Analyst role 1:11:14 - Model predictions: Opus 4.5 and the RL gap 1:14:37 - San Francisco Lore: Living with roommates @dwarkesh_sp & @_sholtodouglas

English
0
0
1
118