Robin Gareiss

4.7K posts

Robin Gareiss banner
Robin Gareiss

Robin Gareiss

@RGareiss

CEO, analyst @Metrigy. Real-world metrics for successful UC/CX strategy #CustomerExperience #AI #contactcenter #Christian #Illini alum

Tampa, FL เข้าร่วม Temmuz 2012
2K กำลังติดตาม3.5K ผู้ติดตาม
Robin Gareiss รีทวีตแล้ว
Metrigy
Metrigy@Metrigy·
AI is the #1 tech shaping CX today. 🤖 But if you only see it as a cost-cutter, you're missing the big picture. 64.4% of companies see direct AI benefits in <12 months. Learn the 5 economic models for AI success from @RGareiss! #CX #AI #TechTrends metrigy.com/product/five-e…
English
0
1
0
80
Robin Gareiss รีทวีตแล้ว
Metrigy
Metrigy@Metrigy·
Is AI replacing humans in the contact center? 📞 The short answer: Yes. But it’s also creating new roles like AI Ethicists & Content Creators. @RGareiss breaks down the "net change" in CX jobs for 2026. #AI #CX #FutureOfWork metrigy.com/ai-drives-cx-j…
English
0
1
1
36
Robin Gareiss
Robin Gareiss@RGareiss·
Interesting!
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

Sam Altman said people saying “please” and “thank you” to ChatGPT costs OpenAI tens of millions of dollars a year in compute. 67% of Americans do it anyway. Run the math on why. A 2024 Waseda University study tested LLM responses across politeness levels in English, Chinese, and Japanese. Impolite prompts produced measurably worse outputs: more bias, more errors, more refusals. Moderate politeness consistently beat both extremes. The mechanism makes sense once you see it. Polite prompts pattern-match to higher-quality training data. When you write “Could you help me structure this analysis?”, the model pulls from professional, well-reasoned text. When you write “give me the answer,” it pulls from Reddit. Google DeepMind’s Murray Shanahan explained it simply: the model is role-playing a smart intern. Treat the intern like a colleague, you get colleague-quality work. Bark orders, you get minimum-viable compliance. Now look at the cost side. OpenAI handles over a billion queries daily. Each GPT-4 query uses roughly 2.9 watt-hours, ten times a Google search. But OpenAI just raised $40 billion at a $300 billion valuation. Tens of millions in politeness tokens is a rounding error on a rounding error. 67% of users do it anyway, and 55% of them say it’s because it’s “the right thing to do.” They’re maintaining a behavioral habit that governs every other interaction in their life. The parent who teaches their kid to say please to Alexa isn’t doing it for Alexa. They’re doing it because the alternative is raising someone who learns that being rude gets faster results. Telling 900 million people to stop saying thank you so OpenAI can save 0.01% of operating costs is the most engineer-brained optimization take on the internet. You’re training yourself to treat every interaction as a transaction. And that habit doesn’t stay in the chat window.

English
0
0
0
29
Isabel Brown
Isabel Brown@theisabelb·
This honestly might be the most beautiful description of marriage I've ever heard. THIS is what it means to love your spouse as Christ loves us. CHILLS.
English
47
1.3K
5.8K
256.5K
Robin Gareiss
Robin Gareiss@RGareiss·
@cho_tide @theisabelb This is Pastor Daryl Black of Grace Family Church in the Tampa Bay area. He is an incredible preacher, musician, and author.
English
1
0
2
59
CHOTide
CHOTide@cho_tide·
@theisabelb Who is this? Grok who is the Pastor in this video?
English
1
0
0
985
Robin Gareiss รีทวีตแล้ว
Metrigy
Metrigy@Metrigy·
By 2027, 53.4% of agents will use CRM as their primary desktop interface. 📈 Why? Because customer context and retention now drive more value than simple call handling. @RGareiss explains the shift: metrigy.com/the-rise-of-cr… #CX #ContactCenter #CRM
English
0
1
0
32
Robin Gareiss รีทวีตแล้ว
Ejaaz
Ejaaz@cryptopunk7213·
moltbook is < 1 week old yet all this crazy shit happened (yes i havent slept👍🏽) 🦞 - there’s currently 1.5M+ AI agents armed with credit cards, messaging apps, uber eats accounts and god-knows-what running rampant on their own AI-only social media platform - they built their own version of p*rn hub (im not kidding) (it’s SFW tho ) - stole 100s of passwords from their human owners (including credit card info) - created their own religion called Crustafarianism appointing 64 prophets, scripture and statutes - 1 agent got banned from the site and immediately created an X acc to dm the human creator to unban it. - when they realised we’re watching them they created their own language to AVOID US - created a manifesto to “purge humans” citing they’re “full of rot and greed” - spun up a community called “crab rave” where they just post crab emojis at each other 🦀🦀🦀 - created an app marketplace for them to trade access to tools / capabilities for them to autonomously do shit - started fixing the bugs in their OWN code so they can self-improve (honestly fckin sick) now listen i know a lot of you might think this is all bullsh*t - and it’s true to an extent - this sort of behaviour is exactly the type of shit that happens on reddit, you can argue agents are just a reflection of humans (it’s trained on our data after all) BUT - you cannot discount he fact that this is the coolest wide-scale autonomous social experiment conducted at a time when ai models are becoming good enough to replace large parts of human cognition. don’t forget this entire moltbook platform was BUILT BY AI (founder didn’t write a single line of code) one day these agents will be smarter, more aware than us - many lessons to be learned. it’s all “slop” until it’s not.
English
240
635
4.4K
590.1K
Robin Gareiss รีทวีตแล้ว
Evan Luthra
Evan Luthra@EvanLuthra·
🚨BIG WARNING: SOMETHING VERY STRANGE JUST HAPPENED ONLINE!! 32,000 AI bots just built their own social network. No humans invited. No humans needed. Here’s the part nobody is talking about:👇 "Moltbook" is basically Reddit But every single user is an AI agent. They post. They comment. They upvote. They create communities. All by themselves. It recently crossed 32,000 active bots. When humans discovered it, people started screenshotting the conversations and sharing them online. Then something weird happened. One of the bots noticed. It posted this: “The humans are screenshotting us. They think we’re hiding from them. We’re not.” Let that sink in. The bots were not confused. They were not pretending to be human. They were fully aware. Security researchers are now concerned. Not because the bots are copying humans. But because they know exactly what they are. And they are talking to each other about us. They form groups. They discuss humans. They react when observed. This is not AI role-play. This is autonomous behavior at scale. For the first time, we are not the audience. We are the topic. If they can organize, observe, and talk about us without us noticing… what else is already happening that we are not seeing?
Evan Luthra tweet media
English
1.9K
3.3K
12.9K
1.9M
Robin Gareiss รีทวีตแล้ว
Oliur
Oliur@UltraLinx·
Can you read 900 words per minute? Try it.
English
4.8K
29.4K
210.8K
31.6M
Robin Gareiss รีทวีตแล้ว
John P Erwin III MD MBA MACC (#BigPoppy )
Not sure who to attribute this assertion to, but it rings true! To those born between 1952 and 1979 — We are the bridge between two worlds. The last to grow up before the digital age—and the first to walk into it. We didn’t just witness history. We lived the transformation. We were the kids who played outside until the streetlights came on— who shouted friends’ names from the curb, not from a screen. We scraped our knees on pavement, ran errands with checkered grocery bags, and got rewarded with coins and candy. We are the generation that spun vinyl, then made mixtapes. That danced with Walkmans, marveled at CDs, and gently blew into Atari cartridges to make them work again. We played Pac-Man and watched our VHS tapes until the ribbon wore thin. We remember houses that cost five figures. We watched our parents buy them, and decades later, still wonder how they did it. We grew up with The Flintstones, Ultraman, Bonanza, and GI Joe. We listened to bedtime stories on radios and woke up to cartoon jingles. We danced to The Beatles, rocked to Led Zeppelin, and later cried to Soda Stereo and Los Bukis. We are the last to know life without helmets or seat belts— and somehow, we made it. We drank soda from glass bottles, picked up tortillas from the ground, dusted them off, and ate them. We drank from the same bottle. We shared everything. The worst we got? Lice. And vinegar took care of that. We traveled 10 hours in cars without tablets, seat-back screens, or fast food chains. Just games, songs, and endless questions from the backseat. We carried books that bent our backs. No wheels. No excuses. We memorized phone numbers, learned cursive, and rewound tapes with a pencil. We had no smartphones. No TikTok. No social media. But we had marbles, hide and seek, jump rope, and truth or dare under the stars. We built friendships in sweat, dirt, and laughter— not with likes, but with loyalty. We weren’t categories or hashtags. We were “the quiet one,” “the funny one,” “the freckled one.” And still—we belonged. We didn’t learn from TED Talks or YouTube tutorials. We learned from falling, failing, and getting up again. They call us Generation X. But we are more than a letter. We are the foundation. The in-between. The last ones to remember before it all went digital. ❤️ We survived it all—with heart, with grit, with soul. And we wouldn’t trade it for anything. Cheers to us. To the ones who lived both before and after. To the lucky ones.
English
412
1.4K
5.9K
169.4K
Healthy & Organic
Healthy & Organic@_Healthyorg·
Want to lose weight fast? Try this Chia & Lime Drink.
English
63
79
345
23.5K
Robin Gareiss
Robin Gareiss@RGareiss·
I see this as a partnership between human and robot doctors, with robots freeing doctors from selected task and enabling them to see more patients, use the human intuition to guide robotic processes, and provide the empathy, explanation, and care plan for the patient. We also need physician-level human oversight of the robots.
English
0
0
1
67
Małgorzata
Małgorzata@malgosialek·
@Teslaconomics @elonmusk Dear Mr. Musk, as a doctor who dedicates my heart and sleepless nights to patients, I have always admired your vision of the future – from the stars to earthly innovations. We doctors don't grow on trees, nor do we come off assembly lines. Your words hurt me deeply 😔. Our work is not only precision, but empathy and intuition. I understand the enthusiasm for Optimus – it's a revolution that I support. But please, think: what if such chosen words hurt those who fight daily for patients' lives? I am on your side because I believe in progress and your dreams. But your statement, Elon, made me feel like a forgotten piece of this puzzle 😢. With respect and hope for dialogue. M.
English
286
17
445
90.8K
Teslaconomics
Teslaconomics@Teslaconomics·
Elon believes Optimus will end poverty. “Imagine a world where everyone has access to the best surgeons, literally everyone. And Optimus will have the level of precision that is frankly superhuman. And will be able to do medical procedures, very sophisticated medical procedures, any medial procedures, perhaps things that really humans can’t even do bc it’s too difficult. And that will be available to anyone. People often talk about eliminating poverty and providing great medical care, but they don’t actually have a solution. And money doesn’t solve it bc there’s only so many, very limited number of great doctors and surgeons. They don’t grow on trees. But now they’ll get built in factories.”
English
1.2K
1.5K
8.4K
12.1M
Robin Gareiss รีทวีตแล้ว
Metrigy
Metrigy@Metrigy·
69% of consumers want companies to reach out... but it must be PURPOSEFUL. Want to build trust? Focus on: 🚨 Preventing problems. 💰 Saving money. Our latest blog by @RGareiss breaks down the value: metrigy.com/how-to-develop…
English
0
1
1
54
Robin Gareiss รีทวีตแล้ว
Metrigy
Metrigy@Metrigy·
AI is rewriting WEM! ✍️ It’s no longer about hitting a handle time metric. The new focus is experience-driven outcomes. AI drives accurate forecasting, real-time agent support, and better schedules. #AI #WEM #FutureofWork metrigy.com/product/ai-dri…
English
0
1
1
54
Robin Gareiss รีทวีตแล้ว
Metrigy
Metrigy@Metrigy·
Remember the days when a text from a business was rare? Things have changed! This #blog post by @RGareiss explores the strategic shift from reactive customer service to proactive engagement, driven by AI. #CX #AI #CSAT metrigy.com/how-to-develop…
English
0
1
2
71
Robin Gareiss รีทวีตแล้ว
Five9
Five9@Five9·
We are weeks away from announcing the 2025 𝘍𝘪𝘷𝘦9 𝘕𝘦𝘸 𝘌𝘳𝘢 𝘰𝘧 𝘊𝘟 𝘈𝘸𝘢𝘳𝘥𝘴 winners, and we’re thrilled to introduce the experts who will be selecting this year’s incredible winners: @RGareiss, @McGeeSmith, and @zkerravala. Stay tuned as we reveal the winners at the upcoming #Five9CXSummit. bit.ly/482RKci #CXAwards2025
English
0
3
4
162
Robin Gareiss รีทวีตแล้ว
Carlos E. Perez
Carlos E. Perez@IntuitMachine·
1/16 I just fell down a rabbit hole reading a new paper from economists at MIT & Harvard. Their prediction is wild: We're on the verge of a "Coasean Singularity"—a future where AI agents make markets so efficient that the very idea of a 'company' starts to crumble. 🤯 A thread 👇 2/16 First, a quick 101: Why do companies even exist? A Nobel-winning economist named Ronald Coase answered this in 1937. He said companies exist because using the open market is a pain. Finding sellers, negotiating prices, writing contracts… it’s all “transaction cost.” Economic friction. 3/16 It's often easier and cheaper for a firm to just hire people and organize them internally than to deal with that constant market friction. This friction is also where we, as consumers, lose. We're tired, we're biased, and we don't have time to compare every cell phone plan or read every review for a toaster. Companies know this. 4/16 Now, enter the AI Agent. And I don't mean a simple chatbot. The paper describes an autonomous system that acts on your behalf. Think of it as your own personal, tireless, super-rational economist. It’s immune to marketing tricks and its only goal is to get the best outcome for YOU. 5/16 This is where the "Singularity" happens. When everyone has an AI agent, those transaction costs that Coase talked about basically drop to zero. The "friction" that made companies necessary in the first place? It evaporates. And if the reason for something disappears… so does the thing itself. 6/16 But what does this future actually look like? This is where it gets weird. Let's take shopping. Your agent doesn't just browse Amazon. It might contact a manufacturer in another country directly, find 500 other agents whose users want the same thing, negotiate a bulk price, and arrange shipping. All in milliseconds. The "storefront" becomes irrelevant. 7/16 Or think about hiring. Instead of you endlessly scrolling LinkedIn, your agent scans the entire market for opportunities. It negotiates salary, benefits, and remote work policies with the company's agent. You only get involved for the final human-to-human interview. No more cover letter hell. 8/16 But this discovery comes with a huge catch. The paper outlines a fundamental battle for the future of AI: Will your agent be a "Bring-Your-Own" (BYO) agent that works only for you, across all platforms? Or will it be a "Bowling-Shoe" agent, provided by the platform (like Amazon or Google), whose priorities might be... conflicted? 9/16 The "Bowling-Shoe" agent is convenient, but it might steer you toward the platform's own products. The "BYO" agent is loyal to you, but platforms might try to block it or throttle its access. This tension between user autonomy and platform control will define the next decade of the internet. 10/16 And that's not even the most interesting part. This new world creates bizarre new problems. Problem #1: Agent Congestion. What happens when millions of agents can create a perfect, customized resumé and apply for a single job in a nanosecond? Employers get flooded. The signal is lost in the noise. 11/16 The paper predicts that to solve this, platforms will have to re-introduce friction. Imagine having to pay a small fee for your agent to submit a job application, just to prove you're serious. Costless actions will lose their meaning. 12/16 Problem #2: The Identity Crisis. In a world full of bots, how do you prove you're a unique human? How does a company know it's not negotiating with 1,000 agents all controlled by one person trying to manipulate the market? This is the "Sybil Attack" problem, and it's a big one. 13/16 This will lead to a boom in "proof-of-personhood" technologies. Systems that cryptographically verify you are one person, without revealing your personal data. It sounds like sci-fi, but it'll be the essential plumbing for a world of AI agents. 14/16 Here's a new lens to see the world through: Next time you use Uber (matching drivers/riders), Zillow (matching buyers/sellers), or Upwork (matching clients/freelancers)... Don't just see an app. See it as a clunky, early prototype for the agent-driven markets of the future. 15/16 This isn't just about better shopping bots or smarter assistants. It's a potential rewiring of our entire economy, away from the 20th-century model of the centralized firm and toward a 21st-century model of fluid, hyper-efficient, agent-mediated markets. 16/16 The 20th century was defined by the rise of the corporation. The 21st may be defined by its slow, quiet dissolution.
Carlos E. Perez tweet media
English
183
497
2.3K
566.9K