RabbitHoleAlice

@ReachROCKIN @thekickhouse @JessicaYarmey @NettieBella @shakewithsam @Dolphin_Daze @LuxLifeOSP @owlpost28 @TeriYakiNoodler @TheJPEGDAO @CDeeA1 Hey'lo all... I am @RabbitH0leAlice My secret project will be coming soon to Stellar, stay connected to be... in the know, I will be the one adding the sparkle to your world. 🤫💫💖 #stellarwomen #stellarfamily #XLM

She did a great job. 👏🏽 ©️ 🎥 mariemazzanti

>A Catholic Bishop gets put on prime-time national television in the 1950s >No script, no teleprompter, no celebrity guests, just him, a chalkboard, and the Gospel >Hollywood completely writes him off as boring religious programming >Proceeds to absolutely dominate the TV ratings, drawing 30 million viewers every single week >Crushes the biggest secular comedians in the country to win the Emmy Award >Accepts the Emmy on live TV by thanking his four writers: "Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John." >Converted countless communists, atheists, and Hollywood executives to the Catholic faith >About to be beatified in 2026 We need more men like this. Archbishop Fulton Sheen pray for us!

I understand a little better.

I did not struggle to keep up, super interesting exercise... had a cool halo effect after.

@OliLondonTV This pretty much explains today's society

A Jewish scholar launched an investigation to dismantle Christianity after a family conversion — determined to prove it false with the Old Testament. He wasn’t looking for Jesus. But the moment he started digging, the text pushed back. The contradictions he expected weren’t there — the patterns were. Prophecy after prophecy tightened the deeper he went, pointing with uncomfortable clarity toward one man in history. This clip hits because it captures a rare moment: someone treating scripture like evidence… and being changed by what they found.

Eye Exercises to Remove Specs!

There are so few good humans in politics, sad to see this one go.

My message to Georgia’s 14th district and America. Thank you.

A world where murder is the solution to words you don't like, to hide your secrets, proves how truly evil you are. The day Charlie Kirk was assassinated, I believed it was you. I pray @RealCandaceO will overcome and survive you, let it ALL come out. God keep this human safe. 🙏🏻

5 Most Useful Plants 🪴

Always looking for thought provoking books to read, the Bible will always be my favourite.

Charlie Kirk on the keys to building a lasting marriage and family @charliekirk11

Watch this and try to say with a straight face that this guy is "weak." You can count on one hand the number of people in the GOP with the stones to stand their ground on issues like these -- issues on which Massie is VASTLY better than his detractors ON THEIR OWN TERMS

“There were no babies in ovens... No mass rapes..” —Dr. Gabor Maté to a Z10nist

If you watch Charlie Kirk’s debates, there’s something you’ll see in almost all of them. It’s easy to miss until it’s pointed out to you, but once you’re aware, you’ll notice every time. Here’s the pattern I’ve observed: 1. His first mission is to establish clarity. - Asks his opponent to state their argument - Asks them to define terms - If they struggle with either, he offers one to them and asks if it’s FAIR 2. His second (and most important) mission is to find something, no matter how small, on which he can say the magical phrase: “I AGREE” Human beings WANT to be agreed with. It’s a fundamental drive. It establishes rapport, and helps us feel acknowledged and humanized. Saying “I agree” or “we agree” lowers defenses. Which is THE KEY. Because once defenses go up, communication stops. Charlie knew this, and it was one of his biggest strengths and secret weapons. But he never said it insincerely. That’s why his first step was CLARIFICATION. In order to find a sincere point of agreement, you have to understand what the other person is trying to say. This is a known debate tactic. But even though many skilled debaters use it, few wield it in quite the same way as he did. Why? Because Charlie wasn’t trying to just WIN. He was trying to CONVINCE. He wanted the person across from him to end up BESIDE him. Humiliation wasn’t the goal. Because a person who is simply humiliated or defeated either doubles down or shuts down and walks away. Which is why, if you watch, you’ll see how intently Charlie hunts for the moment he can say “I AGREE”… usually even before he begins his counterattack. He lights up with excitement every time he finds it. Because he knew that once their perspective was entirely dismantled, they’d find themselves floating in a sea of uncertainty… and he wanted them to have a life ring to hold onto. One that was tethered to reason, truth, and a person with whom they knew they could AGREE. Even if only about something small. It’s how he managed to never close the door on someone. It’s how he so beautifully built connection during—and even THROUGH—argument. And it’s something I think we should all notice and study, when we watch him, so that we can do it too. Real winning is about keeping the focus on what you’re fighting FOR, rather than who you’re fighting against. Charlie knew that. It’s become my favorite thing to look for in his debates. And, the more I see it… the more I feel like it’s the real key to carrying on his legacy, and picking up his mic.

#apay 🌱🥰

I found the pickle... RabbitHoleAlice*lobstr.co