Lucy Jane

priorities

The Amish may not have cars but they got that gas

Weed brings everyone together ☺️

@snoopdoggslungz Broke this down on recent post. Check it out on my page.

Sativa, Indica, Hybrid. Most people stop there. The real conversation starts with terpenes and what they do

Celebrating the weekend with a nose dab 👃🏼🍯

@BGatesIsaPyscho Average adventure for a white male.

Bro hits a splif, chugs a beer, lights himself on fire and flips into a waterfall. What are you doing today?

@ReeferMadam And fake from what I’m researching.

4-10 Calls continue to come in $CGC $TLRY What’s happening on 4-10

@ReeferMadam Source?

$CGC 4-10 calls continue to come in. $1.5 million 5-29 $8 call coming in

I know this war is different. But it follows this play by play. As well with your thesis. Invasion begins (boots on the ground, next Thursday) $SPX drops opens ~2/3% Monday after weekend reports, but rapid coalition advances. SUCCESS. TRUMP will parade the SUCCESS. $SPX rips to month end and new bull market begins.

$SPX This drawdown is so eerily similar to last years. If you want to use it as any blueprint, then we see a red day tomorrow followed by a green day on Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday, to close out the week. Then the next big shoe drops. Then you get the big Trump Taco tweet.

Iraq war: Invasion begins (boots on the ground," March 20, 2003) through major combat end (May 1, 2003): Volatile at first (daily swings on battlefield news) but overall positive. Early resistance caused some pullbacks (e.g., Dow dropped ~3.6% on March 24 after weekend reports), but rapid coalition advances and the short duration of major fighting drove gains. Dow rose 8.4% in the month following the invasion start. S&P 500 climbed from the ~860 range in mia-March to ~916 by May 1 (roughly +6-7% in ~6 weeks). Broader / first-year context (to ~March 2004 or end-2003): Very strong. The quick victory helped kick off a bull market. S&P 500 gained 26.7% in the 12 months after the invasion.

@RC21RC31 I get sun everyday. You the one taking the time to comment on some random account. Maybe put down the phone a little more.

@ReeferMadam Just stop. Go get some sun. Better than canna investment. At least you get something.

Trump reschedules cannabis. Eventually. Banking and research comes to cannabis Acquisitions and expansion. MSO’s become profitable. Newsom wins 2028 Cannabis legalized US becomes cannabis world wide hub And you have a chance now to get in. $MSOS $CGC $TLRY

IT'S TIME TO ADDRESS TWO OF THE MOST COMMON FALLACIES IN THE CANNABIS INDUSTRY: 1) INDICA – SATIVA – HYBRID Research has shown that your high is dictated by hundreds of different cannabinoids and terpenes interacting with your endocannabinoid system. The Sativa vs. Indica dichotomy is another fallacy in the cannabis industry. As a physical construct, Sativa and Indica have meaning - their growth differs greatly. But the idea that Sativas and Indicas deliver uplifting highs and sedative highs, respectively, is simply untrue. Those cannabinoids and terpenes could be present in a Sativa or an Indica based on the different genetics, Sativa and Indica refer solely to the physical growth structure of the plant. Does it have an effect on color? Nope. Sativa typically grows tall, with thinner leaves - like a GMO - and Indica grows short and stocky like a papaya strain. These two cultivars are great examples of why the Sativa vs Indica construct is inaccurate. GMO wouldn't be considered a Sativa under popular opinion, with its heavy gas profile that hits extra hard. Papaya, with its fruity, uplifting profile, is likely not an Indica under that construct. So what's the point? This plant is not as simple as Indica - Sativa - Hybrid when it comes to grouping these cultivars by effect. Learning more about the different cannabinoids and terpenes and how they interact with your endocannabinoid system is essential in determining what is right for you. Trial and error is the best way to find what works and what doesn't. 2) THC% If you work on the retail side, you're likely well aware that most smokers shop for cannabis based on a combination of two things: high THC % and price point. However, the very idea that THC % relates to the quality of your experience is a misconception. There is little to no correlation between the two. Truth is, there are hundreds of different compounds in the cannabis plant, a chunk of them are cannabinoids, terpenes, and flavinoids, but those don't tell the whole story. Although THC is the primary psychoactive compound, the entire spectrum plays a crucial role in the symbiotic effect between your personal endocannabinoid system and that of the plant. The specific terpenes, cannabinoids, and other compounds active in any particular cultivar have an array of feelings and experiences associated with them. How they all collectively work together means far more than how THC operates singularly. Factors like harvest date and terpene content also help, but even more important than those is understanding your endocannabinoid system. Everyone is chemically different at our core and in turn, we all experience terpenes and cannabinoids differently. Finding out which genetics work for you is the only way to know what will have the desired effect. On top of the science behind your endocannabinoid system and the vast array of compounds this plant has to offer, with the industry still in its infancy, the inability to deliver consistent, accurate results from testing labs is another reason THC % is a shitty metric. Over the years, companies like 710labs have tested the same batch at different labs and received a huge variance in THC % results (over 20% difference lab-to-lab). In addition, some producers will dry out their flower to the point that it is devoid of terpenes, which in turn produces higher test results...and dried out, flavorless mids lacking effectual nuance. Similarly, a few of the labs in California and Colorado are aware of the "marketability" of higher THC % and favor their bigger clients with fraudulent, inflated data to keep them in business and keep the fallacy pumping. Point being, higher THC % DOES NOT equate to getting more stoned. It's about the genetics, how it's grown, how it's cured, and the freshness of the batch - PERIOD. *article of 710labs #cannabis #THC

These age old question. Does THC % really matter ?

@Parabola0112 If the market begins to price in a Newsom win next year. 2027 run up could be massive just like the run up to Biden. Except Newsom will actually legalize it.

@ReeferMadam I agree w the timeline. The setup for Newsome to champion it and finish the job makes perfect sense IMO. Similarly to how Biden started the process for Trump.

4/20 is January 110th, I guess.

Oops

@mike613ca Everybody is so convinced it won’t happen. Makes me think it will happen even more

@ReeferMadam New lows are not far off at this point. It’s not like any change to the industry is in the works. 🤷🏼‍♂️

Support had now become resistance. $MSOS going lower. Dare I say. All time lows coming.

@NonnaYourbiz Just because you don’t have access to it doesn’t mean it fake.

@GregVance99 @msosbagholder @rp111113 One already going Bankrupt. And supposedly growing industry. Majority of these high debt companies will be nonexistent. The etf is run like shit.

@msosbagholder @ReeferMadam @rp111113 Don’t get your take honestly. $MSOS is a portfolio of solid cannabis sector stocks. It theoretically reduces company specific risk. Yes, if you pick right you can get over or underperformance, but if you have a fundamentally positive view on the whole sector then why not $msos?