

David
6.6K posts

@ReemsMTL
Lawyer, pundit, and loyal fan of the Jacksonville Jaguars




BREAKING: Israeli settlers attempted to burn a Palestinian family alive in the village of Duma in the West Bank. They threw Molotov cocktails at their children's room. Thankfully, the family noticed the fire at the last minute and extinguished it before it was too late.




מסמך הפירוז שחמאס מציגים למנכ"ל מועצת השלום: התניית פירוז הרצועה בסיום הכיבוש, סירוב מוחלט לקשירת שיקום עזה עם הפירוז ושמירת מנגנוני הביטחון של הארגון | פרסום ראשון של @eliorlevy #חדשותשישי עם @MoavVardi

Israel is facing an unusually difficult challenge to its image in America. The question, then, becomes: what would it cost Israel to maintain its popularity? Could Israel plausibly live in safety and security while also keeping Americans' sympathy? commentary.org/seth-mandel/wh…

Netanyahu appears on television in a pre-recorded address, with all the staged choreography one associates with authoritarian regimes, speaking of #Iran ad nauseam. Yet the map behind him tells the real story. #Israel, as far as this government is concerned, has completed the annexation of Palestinian territory. But international law is not so easily erased: ex injuria jus non oritur. No right arises from a wrong. The State of #Palestine remains permanently sovereign, notwithstanding its continued unlawful subjugation under Israeli rule.



Israel is facing an unusually difficult challenge to its image in America. The question, then, becomes: what would it cost Israel to maintain its popularity? Could Israel plausibly live in safety and security while also keeping Americans' sympathy? commentary.org/seth-mandel/wh…

Israel doesn’t have an image problem. The world has a Jew hating problem.


We hear a lot about this 1:1 ratio and I think it’s worth considering none of us would like to be on the other side of this equation. If the enemy was attacking us and saying “we are only killing one of your civilians for one of your soldiers,” none of us would want to be that “collateral damage.” Some wars in history involved large armies confronting primarily combatants, such as the battle of the Somme or Gettysburg. I think most of us would prefer to be civilians in that war, usually able to avoid the battle. If you read about Gettysburg and there had been thousands of civilians killed we’d see it differently. It’s true that modern wars are sometimes tragically fought among civilians. However, precision weapons have also ostensibly given us an ability to avoid casualties. If there are 1,000 enemy infantry in a town of 1,000 people, and the town is not an essential objective, is it good to destroy the whole place? I don’t think we’d want our civilians on the bad side of that equation. The ratio is problematic. The goal, especially with precision munitions, should be very low civilian casualties, not just the brute force of large numbers of casualties. It’s best to consider this number if we are the civilians that can be victims too. And I don’t think any of us want to be on that side of the equation. Better to humanize the civilians than just see them as a ratio. Let’s all take a step back and think hard on this.

Huge shift in American views of Israel 2022: 55% view Israel favorably, 42% unfavorably 2026: 37% view Israel favorably, 60% unfavorable Generational divide hits both parties: 57% of *Republicans under 50* are negative on Israel via @PewResearch poll: pewresearch.org/wp-content/upl…