Republicans

@MathsPlusPlus @realtrumpstein Legal advice doesn’t stop you from turning over evidence. If tapes exist, report them. If not, it’s just a claim.

@RepublicansATL @realtrumpstein Or perhaps she is waiting for legal advice?

BREAKING: Epstein victim says she has tapes of Donald Trump doing things that will force him to resign from the presidency. Keep talking, keep sharing.

@danarch08 @GOP Simple question: would you be okay going to work and not getting paid while others do? Yes or no? Don’t dodge, it answers your own argument.

@RepublicansATL @GOP Literally admitted I insulted you, so I'll go so far as I was losing during those 2 posts. If you're accepting that math, count up your insults, you lost many more times. Not to mention, you lost on the merits of your argument and @GOP lost from their original inaccurate post.

@danarch08 America’s biggest idiot.

@danarch08 @GOP Also notice you didn’t answer the point about insults, you just pivoted again. If insults = loss (your logic), then you insulted me earlier. Does that mean you lost?

@RepublicansATL @GOP I'll admit you annoyed me enough to change my policy not to insult anyone. It's not a law, but a policy. Which reminds me, @GOP could change their policy to only fund all of DHS under 1 bill and pay TSA agents today if they chose.

@danarch08 @GOP If insults = loss, then see what I attached in this thread. It’s insults you said to me. Does that mean you lost?

@RepublicansATL @GOP Again with the insults? We all know what that means. Meantime. take it up with @GOP whose original post only wrote about TSA. They can 100% fund TSA today, but @GOP is choosing not to.

@danarch08 @GOP Also if you claim “when you’re losing, you resort to insults,” then what do you call this? You resorted to insults, does that mean you were losing?

@RepublicansATL And again, when you're losing, you resort to insults. Thanks for playing, but you lose. And thanks for giving me so many chances to remind everyone that @GOP could fund TSA today, but they've chosen not to.

@danarch08 @DarrigoMelanie @GOP @realDonaldTrump “That’s how it works” ≠ “it can never change.” You’re twisting it. You can read that right, correct?

@RepublicansATL @DarrigoMelanie @GOP @realDonaldTrump Plus: "That's how DHS funding works", but now you admit it could be funded differently.

Good morning! Republicans control every branch of the government.

@danarch08 @DarrigoMelanie @GOP @realDonaldTrump I said they don’t split it in practice, not that it’s impossible. Nice try. And you still haven’t addressed the point: your “solution” leaves ICE/CBP not getting paid. So yeah, some people work, some don’t get paid. Try that at your job. Would you be willing to not be paid?

@RepublicansATL @DarrigoMelanie @GOP @realDonaldTrump You very clearly said "They don't split it." And now you admit, they can split it. So once again, @gop could fund TSA today, which they blamed others for. (You should really stop now.)

@WildyCanadian @acnewsitics No argument, just insults. Got it. Still waiting, where’s the U.S.–Iran war you claimed?

@RepublicansATL @acnewsitics Are you fucking stupid?

Watching Trumpers go from anti-war to pro-war is HILARIOUS.

@danarch08 @DarrigoMelanie @GOP @realDonaldTrump I never said “it can’t be done.” You made that up. Please go back and show me where I said that. I said how it’s actually funded, and what happens if you split it: some DHS agents don’t get paid. So yeah, your solution is some people work without pay. Try that at your job.

@RepublicansATL @DarrigoMelanie @GOP @realDonaldTrump Wow, it only took you 50 posts to get this? At least you've moved on from your false "it can't be done!" and ridiculous "it's never been done before!" posts. Now we can agree that funding TSA alone is a choice and @GOP's original post was wrong.

@Moonust_Aeon454 @acnewsitics So now every president is ‘pro-war’? That proves my point, you’ve stretched the definition so far it means nothing. If everything is ‘war,’ then calling Trump ‘pro-war’ isn’t even a distinction anymore.

@RepublicansATL @acnewsitics nice deflection but to answer your question seeing as the conflict under Obama was a war, yes he was pro war.

@Michell33650674 You are absolutely delusional. I know you want it to be true because you’re evil, but it’s not true.

TRUMP TRAFFICKED AND RAPED CHILDREN! GIRLS AND BOYS OF ALL AGES! HE LIKELY KILLED AND CANNIBALIZED SOME! THIS IS ALL IN THE EPSTEIN FILES! EVERYONE IN HIS REGIME IS CONNECTED! THEY ALL HAVE TIES TO EPSTEIN AND/OR FOREIGN ENEMIES! ARTICLE II, SECTION 4! GET THEM THE FUCK OUT!

@danarch08 @DarrigoMelanie @GOP @realDonaldTrump So your solution is: TSA gets paid, but ICE and CBP don’t? That’s exactly the problem. You’re fine with some DHS agents working without pay while others do. How would you like doing your job while everyone else gets paid and you don’t?

@RepublicansATL @DarrigoMelanie @GOP @realDonaldTrump They don't get funded. But TSA does, which was the OP's issue, remember? Show us any statute that requires that all components of an agency be funded in the same bill. If not, you're proving the point that it's a @GOP choice to keep TSA agents from being paid.

@Moonust_Aeon454 @acnewsitics So now your standard is airstrikes + escalation = ‘war’? Then be consistent, Obama carried out hundreds of drone strikes across multiple countries. Was he ‘pro-war’ too, or does your definition only apply here?

@RepublicansATL @acnewsitics x.com/i/grok/share/0…

@danarch08 @DarrigoMelanie @GOP @realDonaldTrump You’re still on “they could.” So answer the question: what happens to ICE and CBP in the meantime? That gap is exactly why DHS is funded as one bill.

@RepublicansATL @DarrigoMelanie @GOP @realDonaldTrump Now you're getting it! Congress cherrypicks programs within agencies in every bill. @GOP could fund TSA, FEMA, CISA, & CG today and a 2nd bill could be proposed for ICE/CBP. It's a decision solely by @gop, not a law or requirement that they are all funded under one bill.

@raggapegs for what reason?

@covie_93 Oh no she didn’t answer questions!! She must be guilty! Is that how that works?

Pam Bondi refusing to answer questions about the DOJ's handling of the epstein case UNDER OATH should tell you all you need to know.

@ANNOKLA1 In order for something to be true, there has to be evidence. Accusations aren’t evidence.

If only they believed the children we wouldn’t have a Pedophile as President.

@LuwellH @Moonust_Aeon454 @acnewsitics If you had an argument, you’d make it. Instead it’s just insults. Stay on topic, where’s the U.S.–Iran war?

@RepublicansATL @Moonust_Aeon454 @acnewsitics Quick question - does he make you swallow or are you allowed to spit it out?