Rick Rob
4.1K posts

Rick Rob
@RickRob8
Ecclesiastes 1:18 (KJV) For in much wisdom is much grief: and he that increaseth knowledge increaseth sorrow.
Grenville, Québec เข้าร่วม Kasım 2017
471 กำลังติดตาม188 ผู้ติดตาม

Hopefully we're now past the "Netanyahu is dead" claim and can move on to adult things
Clash Report@clashreport
Reporter: Could you continue this war without the United States? Netanyahu: You’ve exhausted your questions.
English

@leonardaisfunE @DollsEyeAvoider The beast is not a person
Revelation 13:1**
"And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the name of blasphemy."
English

@leonardaisfunE @DollsEyeAvoider 70th week of daniel =7years
3.5 years man of sin[7th king]
Last 3.5 years son of perdition [8th king]
English

@DollsEyeAvoider Right but this is the beast not the Antichrist.
English

@NowTheEndBegins I don’t know what’s going on with you but you are becoming unhinged and conspiratorial. Very odd behavior.
English

@WarEagle72AU @poperespecter1 These people are too brainwashed to ever know anything
English

@poperespecter1 @RickRob8 He literally said all religions are a path to heaven. There is video and Vatican transcripts of this.
English

@RickRob8 What are you even talking about. Pope Francis never said that. Just lying at this point?

English

@RickRob8 @DrShayPhD @Divine137 Revelation 13:8, Titus 1:2 ( before the world began)
Psalm 89:28-36 (has no end)
English

@Apostle_David Isaiah 28:18 (KJV) And your covenant with death shall be disannulled, and your agreement with hell shall not stand; when the overflowing scourge shall pass through, then ye shall be trodden down by it.
English

Why Daniel 9:27 Cannot Be a Covenant With the Enemy
A Scriptural Case for the Messianic Fulfillment of the 70th Week
Two simple biblical facts dismantle the modern idea of a future seven‑year tribulation built around an Antichrist covenant. These facts are not speculative. They are not theological traditions. They are not denominational interpretations.
They are simply what Scripture says — and what Scripture does not say.
---
1. God has never made a covenant with the enemy.
Throughout the entire biblical canon, God’s covenants are always:
• with His people
• for redemption
• for judgment
• for promise
• for restoration
Never once does God:
• make a covenant with Satan
• make a covenant with a wicked ruler
• make a covenant with a hostile empire
• make a covenant with an Antichrist figure
There is no category in Scripture where God’s redemptive timeline hinges on a treaty made by a wicked ruler.
So when some interpreters claim:
“Daniel 9:27 is a covenant between the Antichrist and Israel.”
They are proposing something that has no precedent in the entire Bible.
Daniel 9 is a prayer about:
• Israel’s sin
• God’s mercy
• God’s covenant faithfulness
• the restoration of Jerusalem
• the coming of the Messiah
It is not a prophecy about God validating a satanic treaty.
The covenant in Daniel 9:27 must be understood within the covenant framework of Scripture — and that framework has no room for a divine plan built on an agreement with evil.
---
2. Scripture never teaches a future seven‑year tribulation.
This point is even more decisive.
The Bible repeatedly mentions:
• 3½ years
• 42 months
• 1260 days
• time, times, and half a time
These appear seven times in Daniel and Revelation, and they all refer to:
• the Great Tribulation
• Jacob’s Trouble
• the trampling of the holy city
• the persecution of the saints
• the ministry of the Two Witnesses
• the protection of the woman in the wilderness
But Scripture never once mentions:
“a seven‑year tribulation.”
That phrase is entirely a modern construction.
If a seven‑year end‑time period were truly central to biblical prophecy, we would expect to see it:
• in Revelation
• in the Gospels
• in Paul’s letters
• in the prophets
But it appears nowhere except in Daniel 9:27 — and even there, the text does not call it “tribulation.”
The only reason some people believe in a seven‑year tribulation is because they import it into Daniel 9:27.
Scripture itself never teaches it.
---
3. Scripture interprets Scripture — and the only covenant that fits Daniel 9:27 is Christ’s.
When we let the Bible interpret the Bible, the pieces fall into place:
Daniel 9:24–27 describes:
• the finishing of transgression
• the ending of sin
• the making of atonement
• the bringing in of everlasting righteousness
• the sealing of vision and prophecy
• the anointing of the Most Holy
These are Messianic works, not Antichrist works.
Daniel 9:27 says:
• the covenant is “confirmed”
• it is confirmed “with many”
• sacrifice ends “in the midst of the week”
Only one event in Scripture fulfills this:
the death of Christ, which ended the sacrificial system forever.
The New Covenant is the only covenant in the Bible that:
• is confirmed
• is made with many
• ends sacrifice
• fulfills Daniel’s prayer
• aligns with the 70‑weeks purpose
• is rooted in God’s mercy and righteousness
No satanic treaty can do these things.
No political agreement can do these things.
No Antichrist figure can do these things.
Only Christ can.
---
4. The 70th week is split — not discarded.
This is the structure Scripture presents:
First 3½ years
Christ’s ministry
(“to finish transgression… to make an end of sins… to make reconciliation for iniquity”)
Middle of the week
The crucifixion
(“He shall cause the sacrifice and oblation to cease”)
Final 3½ years
The future Day of Vengeance
(“time, times, and half a time… 42 months… 1260 days”)

English

@FalconryFinance People would do it to themselves if it was trendy,they already did it with the ice bucket thing a few years ago
English

@DrShayPhD @Divine137 Because israel is another dispensation,another era of time,the body of christ is not the same,the age of grace is about to end and daniel 70th week is about to start
English

If 2 Thessalonians 2 was inferring a literal building, why does Paul never once define temple that way anywhere else?
Why would Paul suddenly switch meanings in one verse and not tell you?
When Paul already said you are the temple, why ignore his clear definitions and replace them with an assumption?
Ezekiel’s vision is full of symbols, sacrifices, measurements, priestly imagery… are you taking all of that literally too, including animal sacrifices coming back? If yes, how does that fit after the cross? If no, then why pick one part to be literal and not the rest?
Revelation 11 measures “those who worship there” along with the temple… how do you measure people inside a building unless the temple includes people?
One more. Can you show a single verse where Paul says “the temple of God is a future building in Jerusalem”? I do not want assumption or inferences, I want an explicit statement.
English

@subzero1986 Sûrement pour quand ca sera illégal davoir des animaux ou ben pour ceux qui voudront manger leurs chats dans pas long
Français

@scoj73 @farmingandJesus The bat story was a lie to hide the real lie that there never was any virussss
English

@farmingandJesus The bat story was bogus. None of us had ever heard of a “wet market” before Covid. Period end.
English

Not feeling as if this was an accident. I didn’t believe the bat story.
TaraBull@TaraBull
Covid shut down the world six years ago this week. What do you remember from that time?
English
Rick Rob รีทวีตแล้ว

@farmingandJesus @Catholic_bro Your pedo god on earth pope was telling you freaks to get the magical vax ,was he right?
English

@ProLifeisProGod @jcaliveinme8 Bad advice,never use the the new world version,many missing verses and twisted and replaced words to fit their propaganda
English

@jcaliveinme8 Do you know if that version claims that Jesus was not God in the flesh?
That specific issue and the trinity were the deal breakers between us.
English

I fumbled the ball, badly. 🥹
Three JW's came to my door and I invited them in to talk. I've never done that before, but last night I prayed to God to send Jehova's witnesses to my door so I could share the gospel, so I knew I needed to talk to them when they arrived.
I asked them if they believe that Jesus is God in flesh, that he was with God the Father and the Holy Spirit through eternity past, that he came and lived a sinless life and died for our sins, so that we could live ...
And they started cherry picking, saying all of our translations are wrong-- that if I knew Greek, I would realize that He is only ONE son of God and is a god among many. I quoted 'in the beginning was the Word and the word was God' and 'and the Word became flesh' ...
And they started up with Greek again. First, my ESV was wrong. When I pulled a KJV off the shelf, that was also 'mistranslated'.
What they were saying felt heretical to me and I lovingly asked them to leave, rather than keep trying.
What a huge opportunity; what a massive failure on my part.
What are we to do? I feel like I'll never know enough to be able to be able to make a difference with people who follow another gospel.
English








