Indian Muslim Archives

Yes, the Indians (Muslim leadership) played a crucial role in aiding the American freedom struggle. There is a reason why George Washington fired a salute for Nawab Hyder Ali and American revolutionaries named a ship after him, idealised him, & sung his praises. Apart from this economic factor, Nawab Hyder diverted crucial manpower, which was to be utilised by the British monarchy against the infant American state. Apart from the East India Company Europeans, a force from His Majesty's Troops (the King's Army), comprising 8,575 rank and file, 429 officers, and 64 surgeons, was dispatched to India. These forces would go on to meet a disastrous fate and suffer failure in India. At Bednore, Nawab Fateh Ali (Hyder Bahadur's son) captured some 1,022 Europeans. This thinning and stretching of resources and crucial manpower was felt on American soil.

This is Farah Bagh ruin, the legacy of Nizam Shahi dynasty of Ahmadnagar sultanate. This was one of the inspirations for the Taj Mahal, as Shah Jahan took refuge here during his time as a prince while rebelling against Emperor Jahangir. When intact, it featured a grand dome and was richly adorned with vibrant colors, intricate motifs, decorative patterns, and painted interiors.

Pyramids are at least 3 times older than Islam.

If you know this, you have ball knowledge Heritage and architecture continuity of muzzfarid

"Wealthiest person of all time" is an interesting question. Has to be either one of the Achaemenid Emperors or Alexander, right? The Persians controlled the Nile, Indus, Tigris, Euphrates, Oxus, the Levant, Anatolia.

The Hindu leadership did. Realising that accepting the Muslim demand of fair representation was disadvantageous, they forced Jinnah to ask partition of two wastelands. This allowed Hindus to unite under one umbrella, scatter Muslim strength and become undisputed hegemon of a landmass with a massive ~11,099 km coastline length and a gigantic size of ~3.2 million km².

In Europe, they meticulously preserve even the tiniest heritage, making their cities beautiful. Conversely, Indo-Islamic era left countless Indian cities & towns with stunning monuments. Now, many are lost, most lie in ruins, & the remaining are neglected and decaying in filth.

If Modi & BJP is doing Hindu- Muslim then who divided the nation on the basis of Hindu-Muslim in 1947??? Gandhi-Nehru??? Who??

In 1516, the Ottomans under Selim the Grim defeated the mighty Mamluk Empire in the Middle East, taking control of Gaza. How did Ottoman forces punish Gaza for rebelling against them? How was Gaza and Palestine ruled from Istanbul? What was the status of Palestinian Arabs under Turkish rule?

My ancestors built some cool stuff 🇮🇳☪️

Hindus and Jains have always lived liked brothers and accepted each other's world views and learned form each other like civilised people do. The founder of Mauryan Empire, legendary king Chandragupta Maurya was a Hindu. He gave up his throne and embraced asceticism under the guidance of the Jain saint Bhadrabahu. He migrated south to Shravanabelagola in modern-day Karnataka. He lived as a monk and ultimately ended his life by performing Sallekhana, a sacred Jain ritual of voluntary fasting unto death to purify the soul. So, this migration from Patna to Karnataka or Karnataka to Patna is not something new. It has been happening for centuries and will continue in future as well. But language warriors won't agree. Also, this brotherhood is not limited to Jains and Hindus. It is there between all four Indic religions i.e. Hindus, Jains, Buddhists and Sikhs. I have seen Sikhs keeping portraits of Durga Maa and other Hindu gods in their shops and houses. Now, Khalistanis cry about this a lot. But most of the Sikhs don't care about Khalistanis. Infact, they also hate them. The man who played a key role in defeating Khalistanis was also a Sikh. If you go Ladkah and Arunachal, you will meet Buddhists, very lovely and warm people. You won't hear anything bad about Hindus from them. It is only a very small group of Bhim Brigades who claim to be Buddhists who abuse Hindus.

This is the India they don't want you to see !

He apparently thought the majority wouldn’t take out their frustration and historical grievances over 800 years of Muslim rule on common Muslims staying back in India, as if he was completely unaware of the true nature of majoritarian politics.