ทวีตที่ปักหมุด
Andrew
2.7K posts
Andrew
@ShipNotHype
I build AI agents and automation systems that replace manual work. Micro-SaaS | N8N workflows | Local LLMs |
Canada เข้าร่วม Nisan 2015
674 กำลังติดตาม767 ผู้ติดตาม
@solo_levelingx It does look like theater at times. But the compression is happening in real time. The labs making actual progress on agents and harnesses will separate from the ones just hyping the next model drop.
English
This "AI Bubble" is a completely hilarious meme to me
We have these different "labs", all they produce is some semi-useful chatbot with different interfaces and charge a monthly subscription and then raise money by pretending the super intelligence is coming soon for years now
English
Exactly. Resumes are becoming background noise in AI lately
A 30-minute live trial where someone ships a small agent workflow or recreates a prompt system tells you more than their last three job titles combined.
The gap between “knows about AI” and “can actually drive leverage with it” is massive right now
English
It’s wild to see how many of the best AI startups have added work trials as a key part of the hiring process.
When things are moving this fast, a candidate’s background on paper is often less relevant than what they can do with the tools in front of them.
English
@DavidSacks The key point most miss: these models don’t create new vulnerabilities, they expose the ones already sitting in the code which is a great point you made.
This upgrade cycle will be massive once defenders get real access before attackers do.
English
It’s time to demystify Mythos.
Mythos is not magic. It’s not a doomsday device. It’s the first of many models that can automate cyber tasks (just like coding).
OpenAI’s GPT-5.5-cyber can now do the same. And all the frontier models (including those from China) will be there within approximately 6 months.
It’s important to recognize that these models do not create vulnerabilities; they discover them. The bugs are already in the code. Using AI to discover and patch them will actually harden these systems.
The leap from pre-AI cyber to post-AI cyber means that there will be a big upgrade cycle. After that, however, the market is likely to reach a new equilibrium between AI-powered cyber-offense and AI-powered cyber-defense.
Obviously it’s important that cyber defenders get access before cyber attackers. That process is already underway but needs to happen quickly (see point above about Chinese models).
Unlike Mythos, GPT-5.5-cyber appears not to be token constrained so it may be the first cyber model that defenders actually get to use.
AI Security Institute@AISecurityInst
OpenAI’s GPT-5.5 is the second model to complete one of our multi-step cyber-attack simulations end-to-end 🧵
English
@packers_owner_j @emollick At this point that feels unavoidable generally speaking…
English
Illustration of the jagged frontier as a PR thing:
1) People had to ask the AI for a party date
2) People wrote the social media posts about the party, set up the invite list
3) People had to solicit AI for the party ideas & select them
4) People order food, put it out, etc...
Sam Altman@sama
GPT-5.5 is going to have a party for itself. it chose 5/5 at 5:55 pm for the date and time. if you'd like to come, let us know here: luma.com/5.5 codex will help the team pick people from the replies. 5.5 had some good ideas/requests for the party, which we'll do.
English
Increasingly, I think, we will see a gap between what you can do with frontier model APIs & what you can do with the native apps from the frontier labs (Codex, Claude Code). Models developed and trained with their native harnesses in mind have more capabilities in their harnesses
English
@thejustinwelsh The old playbook said move to the big tech city.
The new one says: build in public, ship daily, and connect with the sharpest people on the internet.
AI collapsed geography. Your network no longer needs the same address.
English
Feels like we are approaching a new era of AI where machines pass the Turing Test but humans don’t.
English
@PeterDiamandis This is the real unlock. Capital used to be the gate. Now it’s execution speed and judgment.
Now $20 plus consistent output beats most seed rounds theses days.
English
I'll say it again: You can literally get an AI account for $20/month and start changing the world. You don't need to raise billions or millions.
English
@ShipNotHype the feedback loop alone is worth more than most advisors
English
@TheGeorgePu Love that implementation! This is personal leverage in action.
Replace manual tracking and high-touch services with agents that handle the boring parts.
You keep the judgment and the results.
English
Always thought calorie tracking was for gym bros.
Hated it. Quit every time.
Now I let AI do it.
Weekly weigh-in.
Waist check.
Mental note on lifts.
That's the whole system.
Used to pay $80/session for a personal trainer.
Hundreds a month.
Now I pay for compute.
Spend compute, not cash.
That's the new personal finance.
Why aren't any save-money gurus writing about this?
English
@iruletheworldmo I’m curious how quickly they can adapt for local LLM as well. With everything moving so fast you never know what we we’ll see the next few months!
English
@megbear @bhalligan Spot on. Working code was the old golden goat so to speak. Now it’s execution at scale with agents that seemingly “disappear” into the tools. That’s where the real leverage lives.
English
@ShipNotHype @bhalligan I’ve been thinking about this a lot. We used to say “working code trumps theory “ I say that still holds but shifts to execution (the meaningful use at scale)
English
What's the smartest, fastest way you've seen a company force-multiply their people with AI?
Just saw the most clever way a founder is AI-pilling their entire 300-person team. Writing it up to share, but I wonder if it can be topped...
English
Claude Code just charged extra because a commit mentioned “OpenClaw.”
This is what happens when labs prioritize safety theater and billing over actual user experience.
Vibecoding your own agents is no longer optional.
Theo - t3.gg@theo
Fun fact - if you have a recent commit that mentions OpenClaw in a json blob, Claude Code will either refuse your request or bill you extra money. This is an empty repo, I'm just calling Claude Code directly. Insanity.
English
Anthropic shouldn’t do this and doesn’t have to
Would be great if it stopped
Theo - t3.gg@theo
Fun fact - if you have a recent commit that mentions OpenClaw in a json blob, Claude Code will either refuse your request or bill you extra money. This is an empty repo, I'm just calling Claude Code directly. Insanity.
English
@ShipNotHype "shipping folklore" is the best summary of how most AI projects run. the folklore-to-evidence ratio is still like 10:1 in production.
glad you caught the thread. keep shipping these insights.
English
@PolymarketMoney $900B valuation for Anthropic is insane on paper. Either the market is completely detached or they have something massive cooking that actually changes the economics.
English
JUST IN: Anthropic is now considering raising a new round at a $900,000,000,000+ valuation.
English
Today, OpenAI’s lawyers, led by William Savitt, spent hours on aggressive cross-examination - hitting Elon with unfair yes/no traps and trying to paint him as jealous, regretful, and a bully
Every trap failed
Elon fired back and stood firm:
He called himself “a fool” for donating $38 million that built an $800 billion company:
“They should not get rich off a nonprofit. That’s not right”
He shut down every attack on his motives and reiterated the truth:
✅ OpenAI stole the charity
✅ Betrayed the open-source mission for Microsoft billions (the $10B deal was the tipping point)
✅ Larry Page said it’d be “fine” if AI wiped out humanity ✅ Warned Obama years ago
✅ AGI in untrustworthy hands = existential threat
✅ Founded OpenAI as a true nonprofit to benefit humanity.....not to enrich a few insiders
✅ Altman & Brockman were never honest about keeping it nonprofit
✅ Left the board in 2018 after seeing the profit-first direction
✅ The for-profit conversion looted the original mission and its donors
✅ Repeatedly warned Altman & Brockman before the big shift
ALL core facts held firm. Not one key point broken
Now Elon is demanding $130–150 billion returned to the nonprofit + removal of Altman & Brockman + full reversion to nonprofit status
Elon was right then. He’s right now
The truth doesn’t break under pressure
X Freeze@XFreeze
Elon Musk just spent two hours on the stand and proved why he’s fighting so hard for humanity’s future He opened by saying: “This lawsuit is very simple: It is not OK to steal a charity. If OpenAI wins, it will give license to looting every charity in America” He revealed that OpenAI was founded as a non-profit, open-source shield against Google’s AI monopoly, but now “the tail is wagging the dog” as they chase profits instead of protecting humanity Driven by his deep concern for our future, Elon testified that after recruiting Ilya Sutskever from Google to help start OpenAI, Larry Page completely stopped speaking to him. In one conversation, Larry said it would be “fine” if AI wiped out humanity, as long as the machines survived, and called Elon a “speciest” for being pro-human Elon also shared that he personally warned President Obama about the dangers of AI years ago, but the warning wasn’t taken seriously enough. “Here we are in 2026… AI is scary smart,” he said. “It could kill us all. We don’t want a Terminator outcome. We want a Star Trek outcome” He made it crystal clear: putting AGI in the hands of untrustworthy people is an existential risk to civilization That’s why he built SpaceX, Neuralink, and xAI - all part of one unified mission to protect humanity’s future and ensure AI serves us, not destroys us
English